HARMING THE HEGEMON


Will the genius who created this meme please come forward for due attribution. Thanks

How Loopholes & Lack of Strategy Leadership Put US Global Dominance In Peril.

How do you hurt the country with the largest, most technologically advanced, well-funded, and lethal military that has ever existed in the history of the world?

Incrementally.

In irregular warfare, salami tactics use small, gradational steps to overcome opposition. Independently, these small aggressions are insignificant, so much so that they can even go unnoticed. The cumulative effect of these small actions, usually effectuated over long periods of time, is what enables catastrophic, irreparable damage.

Salami tactics are the opposite of shock and awe, but they are as effective and often more enduring: ?Water and wind erosion are salami tactics that literally move mountains. Most important, they allow the attacker to achieve their objective while staying under the threshold of punishment. ?While ‘death by a thousand papercuts’ tactics is not the American way of war, salami tactics are an effective a battle strategy that has been used throughout the ages by our adversaries. Playing the long game has always been an integral part of Chinese and Russian warcraft.

The major threat actors have learned that cyberpower is better suited to long-game subversion rather than brute force. Especially when cyber salami tactics are focused on civilian critical companies and institutions. Additionally, they have also discovered a significant loophole to exploit: The role of the DoD in defending and countering civilian-focused cyber aggression.

The Posse Comitatus Act prevents the Army and Air Force from fighting in the homeland or otherwise involve themselves in civilian issues. Another law, 10 U.S. Code § 275 - Restriction on direct participation by military personnel, similarly restricts the Navy and Marines. The National Guard can be exempted, but only to quell civilian unrest. But again, the attackers hacking into critical companies every day are adversary nation state militarized cyber combatant commands.

As it stands, no one is in charge of defending the civilian sector. (Reminder: DHS has no warfighting authorities).

The DoD is responsible for the nation’s security in and through all warfighting domains. But the Fort/Pentagon’s aversion to thinking wholistically and strategically about adversary cyberpower projection sets conditions for protracted cyberconflict where the adversaries not only have asymmetric advantage but also escalation dominance.

In plain English: The bad guys are taking our lunch and holding all the cards.

Meanwhile we argue the merits of a cyber force, try to reconcile the unreconcilable “cyberspace is a warfighting domain, but only for greyzone activities” conundrum and debate the legality conducting greyzone offensive activities in civilian bluespace. (Don’t even get me started on CMMC).

Times of geopolitical upheaval like we’re seeing today are particularly fraught with powerplays. And the decades of relentless cyber aggression has made us weaker.

Remember, the major threat actors (Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran) have a compelling motivation to hurt America. With the exception of North Korea, these countries have all been global hegemons at someone point in their history. From their viewpoint, the power to shape global events, to control markets, to influence culture, technology and science has been usurped by a brand new upstart country. The U.S. was barely 175 years old when it assumed the global hegemon position. This is an indignation the Axis of Authoritarians don’t suffer gladly.

Russia gave the world Tchaikovsky, China made the first compass and gunpowder, Iran invented calculus….and the U.S. countered with Elvis, McDonalds and social media content creators. You can see how arriviste America with garish taste, no history and puerile values are an affront to the centuries of rich culture, conquests, inventions, and storied historical pasts of Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran.

The reigning hegemon’s values become, by default, global values. However, there is only room for one hegemon at the top of the world order. In order to advance, America has to descend. It has to be weakened.

And the best way to achieve that ends is via relentless, incremental, imperceptible degradation of the pillars that support our economy and government.

Irregular warfare is the adversary's dominant type of warfare. We are not prepared. We are preparing for a war in which we are armed and experienced, not the war that's actually happening.

Instead of fighting the fight that fits our weapons, we need to make weapons and create strategy to fight the fight.


Kathleen Creighton

Board Member | 2-Star US Navy Rear Admiral (Ret.) | Cybersecurity - Transformation - Leadership Speaker | Board Committees: Audit and Strategic Risk Oversight.

1 个月

With our 4-year election cycle, inability to pass a budget and 5-year DOD POM cycle, the US clearly has no long-game strategy. Gentry Lane

Smart, strong commentary on a crucial topic. Thanks for raising the alarm and suggesting solutions. Keep it up.

Kandy Z.

Cyber Strategist, Cyber OSINT

2 个月

The best way to defeat any system is to use the system against itself.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Gentry Lane的更多文章

  • CONDITION vs. CONFLICT

    CONDITION vs. CONFLICT

    Is relentless cyber aggression on American companies a condition that needs to be managed or an adversary invasion that…

    3 条评论
  • Choosing Battles in a Multi-Front War.

    Choosing Battles in a Multi-Front War.

    Fed up with the volatility and shifting borders in central Europe, rise of autocracy and encroaching antisemitism in…

    9 条评论
  • US Manufacturing: Once a Strength, Now a Liability

    US Manufacturing: Once a Strength, Now a Liability

    Not since WWII has private industry carried such outsized influence on national security strategy and policy. Now more…

  • Buyer Beware

    Buyer Beware

    And be smarter, too. My big takeaway from the CrowdStrike Catastrophe: People buy cybersecurity software without…

    11 条评论
  • "I’d Lay My Life Down For My Country, But Not For My Program"

    "I’d Lay My Life Down For My Country, But Not For My Program"

    Here’s what I don’t understand: Warfighters are brave enough to sacrifice their life for this country, but not brave…

    15 条评论
  • CYBERSECURITY’S COME TO JESUS MOMENT

    CYBERSECURITY’S COME TO JESUS MOMENT

    AND THE INEVITABLE CAPITULATION OF CYBERSPACE Thank God the CrowdStrike security event didn’t happen during a national…

    29 条评论
  • Ceci n'est pas une cybersecurity company

    Ceci n'est pas une cybersecurity company

    Defending democracy is a pointless goal. No battle was ever won by defense alone, so defending democracy is a…

    6 条评论
  • 1938 or 1939?

    1938 or 1939?

    I just returned from 6 weeks in 7 European countries meeting with 8 national cyber directors, warfighters, NATO…

    34 条评论
  • Countercyberspace Operations

    Countercyberspace Operations

    Harrowing Truth About the Current Condition A well-known fact: Civilian critical infrastructure companies comprise the…

    16 条评论
  • The World is a Tinderbox and Putin is Playing with Matches

    The World is a Tinderbox and Putin is Playing with Matches

    The timing of two recent events scares the hell out of me. During an interview, Putin said that Russia would “invade…

    7 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了