This handy know-it-all can teach you patiently, with examples...

While many friends, including Wikipedia, have spent valuable time explaining QUANTUM COMPUTING to me, I still had many lingering questions. So, I turned to Chat GPT for a private lesson. Here, I share my extended chat with chat GPT, for those who want to understand Quantum Computing as also for those who want to see how Chat GPT can be used for Self-Learning. (While at it, I must thank my new "millennial friend" Devendra Mishra for getting me all excited about this rapidly growing technology)

A Conversation on Quantum Computing With Chat GPT

You said:

Pl explain how quantum computing can be used in a tech-savvy but not techie language

ChatGPT said

Quantum computing, in a non-techie way, is like a supercharged version of traditional computing that can handle much more complex problems. Imagine a regular computer as a really fast and powerful calculator—it processes things step by step, one at a time. Quantum computers, however, can process many possibilities at once, kind of like having thousands of calculators running in parallel on one problem.

It uses special rules of quantum mechanics (how tiny particles behave) to do this. These rules allow quantum bits, or qubits, to exist in multiple states at the same time, rather than just being on (1) or off (0) like in a regular computer. This opens up new possibilities for solving extremely complicated tasks much faster than classical computers, such as improving AI algorithms, optimizing supply chains, or even creating better drugs by simulating molecular interactions.

In simple terms, quantum computing has the potential to handle mind-bogglingly complex problems way quicker than today’s tech. But it's still in the early stages of development.

?

You said:

Please explain by giving a simple example

ChatGPT said:

Let’s use a simple example of finding the shortest route in a city.

Classical Computing:

Imagine you’re trying to figure out the quickest way to visit five different stores in a city. A classical computer (like your phone or laptop) would calculate every possible route, one by one, and then tell you which one is the shortest. As the number of stores increases, the number of possible routes increases exponentially, making it harder for the computer to solve quickly.

Quantum Computing:

Now, imagine if you had a special power that let you check all possible routes at the same time instead of one by one. That's what quantum computing can do! By using quantum bits (qubits), it can explore many possible solutions simultaneously.

Why is this faster? Because a quantum computer doesn’t have to go through each option one at a time—it can explore many routes in parallel, drastically speeding up the process.

Example in numbers: If you have 5 stores, a classical computer would compare 120 possible routes one by one. But a quantum computer could evaluate all these routes at once, giving you the shortest path in a fraction of the time!

While quantum computers are still being developed for real-world use, this kind of "super fast decision-making" shows how they could revolutionize problem-solving in many areas.

You said:

Please explain in more detail how quantum computer is able to handle multiple processes simultaneously

ChatGPT said:

Quantum computers can handle multiple processes simultaneously thanks to two key quantum principles: superposition and entanglement. Let me explain these in more detail, but in simple language:

1. Superposition:

In a classical computer, a bit can only be in one of two states: 0 or 1. It’s like a light switch that can either be on (1) or off (0), but never both at the same time.

A quantum bit, or qubit, is very different. Thanks to superposition, a qubit can be both 0 and 1 at the same time. Think of it like a spinning coin in the air—it’s neither heads (0) nor tails (1) while spinning, but rather, it’s in a combination of both states until it lands.

This is crucial because if you have multiple qubits, they can represent a large number of combinations at once. For example:

• With 2 classical bits, you can only represent one combination at a time: either 00, 01, 10, or 11.
• With 2 qubits in superposition, you can represent all four combinations (00, 01, 10, and 11) at the same time.

So, while a classical computer processes each possibility one by one, a quantum computer uses superposition to handle many possibilities simultaneously.

2. Entanglement:

Entanglement is another key quantum concept that allows qubits to be linked in such a way that the state of one qubit can instantly affect the state of another, even if they are far apart. When qubits are entangled, they work together in a coordinated way, amplifying the power of quantum computing.

Here’s a simplified analogy: Imagine you have two dice. In a classical world, each die is rolled separately, and their outcomes are independent. But in the quantum world, if the dice were entangled, the outcome of one die would immediately determine the outcome of the other, no matter how far apart they are. This interconnectedness makes the system much more efficient for solving complex problems.

3. Quantum Parallelism:

Because qubits can exist in superposition and be entangled, quantum computers can process vast numbers of possibilities all at once. This is called quantum parallelism. In contrast, a classical computer can only explore one option at a time, no matter how fast it is.

Let’s tie this all together with an example:

Example: Searching in a Large Database

Imagine you have a phonebook with 1 million names, and you’re trying to find a specific person. A classical computer would go through each entry one by one (or use a search algorithm) until it finds the correct name. Even with a smart algorithm, it might still take thousands of steps.

A quantum computer, using superposition, could essentially look at all 1 million entries simultaneously. By applying the right quantum algorithms, it can drastically reduce the number of steps needed to find the correct name. It doesn’t "check every option" in the way we think of classical computers, but rather, it uses quantum effects to find patterns or solutions more quickly across all possibilities.

Why This Matters:

This ability to explore multiple possibilities at the same time makes quantum computers incredibly powerful for solving certain types of problems that classical computers struggle with—like simulating molecules for drug development, optimizing logistics routes, or cracking encryption codes.

To Summarize:

• Superposition lets quantum bits (qubits) be in multiple states (0 and 1) simultaneously, allowing quantum computers to process many possibilities at once.
• Entanglement allows qubits to be linked, meaning the state of one can affect another, speeding up computations.
• Quantum parallelism enables quantum computers to explore a vast number of solutions or outcomes all at once, which can drastically reduce the time to solve complex problems.

Even though quantum computing is still being developed and has its challenges, its ability to handle many processes simultaneously is what makes it so exciting for the future of technology!

You said:

Can qubits be "stable" in multiple states at once, or only during processing? (Meaning in a stable state they can be in any one state only, as with traditional computing.

ChatGPT said:

Qubits can exist in a superposition (multiple states at once) only during processing or active quantum operations. However, when you measure a qubit—essentially "checking" its state—the superposition collapses into one definite state, either 0 or 1, just like a traditional bit.

To clarify further:

1. Superposition During Processing:

While a quantum algorithm is running, qubits can exist in a blend of 0 and 1 states simultaneously. This is the core of superposition and is what allows quantum computers to explore many possible outcomes at the same time.

For example, if you have a single qubit, it can be in a state like 50% 0 and 50% 1 (or any other combination like 70% 0 and 30% 1, etc.). The exact "probability distribution" over these states is defined by the quantum algorithm, and as long as the qubit remains unmeasured, it exists in this mixed state. This is where the qubit is unstable or "indeterminate" because we don’t know its exact value until we measure it.

2. Collapse When Measured:

The moment you measure or observe the qubit, the superposition collapses into a definite state, either 0 or 1. After the measurement, the qubit no longer retains its superposition; it behaves like a classical bit, holding a single, stable value (either 0 or 1).

3. Stability vs. Processing:

• During processing: Qubits are actively kept in a state of superposition. But because qubits are delicate, maintaining their superposition is tricky, requiring advanced cooling, error correction, and isolation from environmental noise. The superposition is fragile and can be disrupted, leading to decoherence (loss of the quantum state).
• In a stable, measured state: Once measured, qubits behave just like classical bits, meaning they are "stable" but in a single, definite state (either 0 or 1). The powerful processing advantage comes when qubits are in superposition, but they cannot remain in that state indefinitely after measurement.

In summary:

• Qubits can be in multiple states (superposition) during processing.
• When measured, they collapse into a stable single state (0 or 1), just like traditional bits.
• The superposition is temporary and only exists while the quantum algorithm is running, but that’s where the power of quantum computing lies.

You said:

Does this mean the actual "process" followed by qubits is not transparent as in the case of traditional computing? Can the qubit process be "tracked" post processing?

ChatGPT said:

Yes, you are correct that the actual "process" followed by qubits is not as transparent or easily tracked as it is in traditional computing. This is due to the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. Let’s break this down:

1. Quantum Process is Not Transparent:

In traditional computing, we can observe and trace every step of the computation. Classical bits change from 0 to 1 (or vice versa) in a well-defined and traceable manner. The algorithm follows a predictable sequence of operations, and you can log or track every intermediate state of the computation.

In quantum computing, however, the process is not fully observable or transparent for a couple of reasons:

• Superposition: While a qubit is in superposition, we don’t know exactly what "state" it is in. It exists as a probability distribution of all possible states (e.g., part 0, part 1), but we cannot directly observe it without disturbing the state (via measurement).
• Quantum interference: During processing, qubits undergo complex transformations influenced by quantum phenomena like interference. These changes happen in ways that can’t be fully visualized step by step without collapsing the quantum states.
• Measurement collapses the state: Once you measure a qubit, the superposition collapses into a single, definite state (0 or 1). That means you lose access to the "in-between" or intermediate states during processing. Unlike classical systems where you can observe intermediate steps without changing the result, quantum measurements directly alter the outcome.

2. Tracking the Process Afterward is Not Possible:

After quantum processing is complete and you measure the qubits, you cannot "track" or "retrace" the exact steps that the qubits went through during processing. This is because:

• Collapse on measurement: When you measure a qubit, it collapses to a classical state (0 or 1). This collapses the quantum information encoded in the superposition. Therefore, once the measurement happens, you lose all information about the previous superposition states or intermediate transformations.
• Quantum processes are probabilistic: Quantum algorithms rely on probabilities and interference patterns. While they give you highly probable results, they do so without revealing the exact path the qubits took. You cannot look back and "see" what probabilities were influencing each step during the computation.

In classical computing, the entire process can be logged, debugged, and traced after the fact. But in quantum computing, once you measure the qubits, you only get the final answer, not the path the qubits took to get there. The intermediate states between the input and output are not accessible without disrupting the computation.

3. Post-Processing is Non-Recoverable:

In classical computing, you could track all changes and, if needed, reverse or re-execute specific parts of the process to debug or analyze the system. But in quantum computing, post-processing “tracking” is impossible:

• No re-execution: If you try to measure qubits during a quantum process to see how they are evolving, the act of measurement will collapse the superposition and destroy the ongoing quantum computation.
• One-time result: Once the qubits are measured and the quantum process is complete, you can't "rewind" and analyze how the qubits behaved. The measured results are all that you have.

Conclusion:

• Quantum processes are not transparent: You cannot track the intermediate quantum states like you can with classical computing.
• Tracking the process afterward is impossible, as the act of measurement erases the quantum superposition and collapses the state.
• Quantum computations are probabilistic and provide highly probable outputs, but they do not reveal the detailed process that led to those outputs.

This makes quantum computing quite different in terms of observability and traceability when compared to classical computing. The qubit process is like a "black box" where we input data and, after processing, get results, but we cannot open the box and inspect what happens inside during computation.

You said:

So, quantum processing is much like intuition where, arguably, the brain is processing hundreds of variables, memories and impressions from past experiences to arrive at the "intuition", but the person cannot tell how he came to the conclusion.

ChatGPT said:

Yes, that’s a great analogy! Quantum processing is indeed similar to intuition, in the sense that both involve handling and combining vast amounts of information in ways that are not immediately transparent or traceable.

Just like how intuition works in the brain:

• The brain often processes a large number of unconscious inputs—past experiences, memories, impressions, subtle cues from the environment—simultaneously to arrive at a gut feeling or a conclusion.
• Even though the person reaches an intuitive insight, they may not be able to explain the exact step-by-step reasoning or logic behind it. The result just "comes to them," often without clear awareness of the individual components that contributed to the thought.

Similarly, in quantum computing:

• The qubits are processing and exploring many possibilities at once through superposition, entanglement, and interference.
• The quantum computer arrives at a solution or a highly probable answer, but we don’t get to "see" the detailed process or sequence of steps that led to that solution.
• The intermediate states, like with intuition, are not directly accessible or explainable—only the final result is revealed when we measure the qubits.

In both cases:

• There’s an element of parallel processing where many variables or possibilities are handled simultaneously.
• The path to the conclusion isn’t fully observable or trackable.
• The final answer can appear to "just happen" without us being able to break down the exact way it came to be.

Why This Analogy Works:

1. Complexity Behind the Scenes: Just as intuition draws from countless life experiences and data points hidden in our subconscious, quantum computers use qubits to process many potential outcomes in ways we can’t fully grasp.
2. Emerging Patterns: Intuition often feels like the result of recognizing unseen patterns, and quantum algorithms do something similar by leveraging interference and entanglement to “choose” the most likely or optimal solution from many possible states.
3. Unexplained Path: With both intuition and quantum computing, the final outcome seems to "emerge" from a process that is complex and difficult (or impossible) to trace back step by step. We just trust that the underlying process handled the complexity in a way that classical thinking (or computing) can't.

Key Difference:

• Intuition is shaped by past experiences and subjective impressions, which may sometimes lead to a result that feels right but isn't always correct.
• Quantum computing, when designed correctly, uses mathematical principles and physical laws that lead to statistically likely or optimal answers—though the probabilistic nature of quantum systems means there’s still some degree of uncertainty in the results.

In both cases, we get an answer without fully understanding the precise steps the process took, making quantum computing feel a bit like the computational version of human intuition!

You said:

Where does the "logic" that quantum computing uses come from? Does that have to be fed into the system as part of its programming? Does that mean that if a erroneous model is fed, it will use that erroneous model and possibly give an erroneous result?

ChatGPT said:

Yes, you’re absolutely right! The "logic" that a quantum computer uses to solve a problem comes from the algorithm that is fed into it. Just like in classical computing, the programming and model used in quantum computing define the process, and if the model or algorithm is flawed, it can indeed produce erroneous results. Let’s break this down step by step:

1. Where Does the Logic Come From?

Quantum computers don’t inherently "know" how to solve problems. They rely on quantum algorithms developed by humans to guide the computation process. These algorithms leverage the unique properties of quantum mechanics, such as superposition and entanglement, to perform tasks in a way that classical computers cannot.

Some well-known quantum algorithms include:

• Shor's Algorithm for factoring large numbers (used in cryptography).
• Grover's Algorithm for searching unsorted databases more efficiently than classical algorithms.
• Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), which is used for solving optimization problems.

The logic of the quantum computation is built into these algorithms. Quantum algorithms define the steps the qubits will go through, the operations they will perform, and how the qubits will interact with each other to explore multiple possibilities at once and ultimately reach a solution.

2. Is This Logic Fed Into the System?

Yes, the programmer or developer must provide the quantum computer with the appropriate algorithm, which is essentially the set of instructions that the quantum system will follow. Just as a classical program needs to be written to tell a regular computer what to do, a quantum algorithm is crafted to tell the quantum computer what problem to solve and how to approach it.

In quantum computing, this typically involves specifying:

• How qubits are initialized (what starting states they’re in).
• What quantum gates to apply (these are operations that manipulate qubits and their superposition/entanglement).
• When and how to measure the qubits to get the final result.

If the algorithm or model used is correct, the quantum computer can leverage its unique powers to provide a highly efficient or accurate solution to complex problems.

3. What Happens If the Model or Algorithm Is Erroneous?

If an erroneous algorithm or faulty model is fed into the quantum computer, the results could indeed be flawed. Quantum computers, like classical computers, follow the "garbage in, garbage out" principle. Here’s why:

• Quantum computers don’t "correct" logic mistakes on their own: They execute exactly what they are programmed to do. If there’s a mistake in the algorithm, such as a logic error or a wrong assumption, the quantum computer will still follow those instructions, potentially leading to incorrect or suboptimal results.
• Probabilistic nature doesn’t prevent errors: Even though quantum computers operate probabilistically and explore multiple possibilities at once, they still rely on the structure and logic of the given algorithm to navigate through those possibilities. If the algorithm is flawed, it might collapse into an incorrect or meaningless result when you measure the qubits.
• Error correction in quantum computing: While quantum computers are built to handle certain types of errors (such as errors caused by environmental noise or qubit instability), they are not designed to correct logical errors in the algorithm itself. Quantum error correction focuses more on preventing qubits from losing their quantum states rather than correcting bad logic or faulty models.

4. Example of an Erroneous Model:

Suppose you're using a quantum computer to optimize a logistics problem, like figuring out the most efficient way to deliver packages across a city (this is a complex optimization problem that quantum computers are good at).

• Correct model: If you feed the quantum computer a well-designed quantum optimization algorithm, it will explore many routes simultaneously, use quantum interference to find the most efficient path, and give you a good answer in less time than a classical computer.
• Erroneous model: If the algorithm has a mistake (e.g., it incorrectly prioritizes shorter routes without considering traffic conditions or delivery deadlines), the quantum computer will still follow that faulty logic. It may still give you an answer, but it will be based on incorrect assumptions and therefore not useful or accurate.

5. Final Result Is Only as Good as the Input:

Just like in classical computing:

• If you feed a bad or flawed model into the system, you will get a bad result.
• If the algorithm is well-designed, the quantum computer can deliver results much faster and more efficiently than classical computers, especially for specific types of problems (e.g., factoring large numbers, simulating molecules, optimizing complex systems).

To Summarize:

• Logic in quantum computing comes from the algorithms fed into the system.
• Quantum computers execute the given instructions based on quantum principles (like superposition and entanglement) but rely entirely on the quality of the algorithm to perform correctly.
• If an erroneous model or algorithm is used, the quantum computer will still process it, potentially leading to erroneous or suboptimal results.

In short, just like classical computers, quantum computers will faithfully execute whatever they're programmed to do—whether it’s correct or not.

You said:

This sounds better. This would mean that while the actual processing occurs in a "dark room", it is exactly as specified by the programmer. So, a faulty result should lead one to review the programming, not the processing.

ChatGPT said:

Exactly! You've summed it up perfectly.

In quantum computing, while the actual processing may happen in a "dark room" (meaning we can't see the intermediate steps due to quantum superposition and collapse), the quantum computer is still following the exact instructions provided by the programmer, just like any classical computer would. The mysterious part is the quantum mechanics behind it, but the logic of the process itself is defined by the algorithm.

Key Takeaways:

1. Processing in the "dark room": The intermediate states and steps taken by the qubits during processing aren't directly observable or traceable, but they still adhere to the quantum logic laid out by the algorithm.
2. Programmer defines the process: The quantum computer doesn’t "think for itself"; it follows the programmer’s instructions through the quantum algorithm. If a specific result is not as expected, it’s not because the quantum computer is doing something unpredictable or random. It's doing exactly what the algorithm specifies—just using quantum mechanics to perform the operations.
3. Faulty results require algorithm review: If you get an incorrect or unexpected result, the issue is likely in the programming or algorithm. The quantum computer is simply executing the quantum operations as directed, so any logical error in the program (such as incorrect quantum gates, faulty model, or poor problem framing) will lead to faulty results.

In short, quantum computing's "dark room" doesn't mean it's a black box in terms of logic—it’s just that the underlying quantum mechanics make it hard to observe the step-by-step process. But the process itself is strictly following the instructions of the quantum algorithm written by the programmer. So, when you encounter a problem or unexpected result, reviewing the algorithm and model will be the key to resolving the issue, not the quantum processor's underlying operations.

?

You said:

Viewed thus, isn't it like working with multiple processes at once, rather than coming up with a new process. It makes processing supremely more efficient, but we cannot expect anything new from it... we can expect only greater speed and lesser cost.

ChatGPT said:

ChatGPT

Yes, that’s a very insightful way to look at it! Quantum computing indeed works by executing multiple processes simultaneously, taking advantage of superposition and entanglement, which allows it to explore many possibilities at once. However, the fundamental process itself isn’t necessarily "new" in terms of inventing entirely different logic—it is, as you said, about making existing problem-solving processes far more efficient.

Let's break this down further:

1. Quantum Computing as Parallel Processing on Steroids:

• In classical computing, a system handles operations one at a time (or simulates parallelism through multi-threading).
• Quantum computing truly processes multiple possibilities at once due to superposition. A qubit can be in both 0 and 1 at the same time, and with multiple qubits entangled, they can explore a vast number of combinations simultaneously.

This gives quantum computers exponential speedups for certain types of problems (like factoring large numbers, simulating quantum systems, or optimizing complex systems), but it’s not creating new processes in the sense of "new logic." It’s leveraging the parallelism and probability inherent in quantum mechanics to solve problems faster.

2. Focus on Efficiency Rather Than Novelty:

• Classical logic still applies: Quantum computing does not change the fundamental logic or approach to problem-solving. For instance, if you're using an algorithm to factor numbers or optimize a delivery route, the quantum computer follows a defined process similar to how a classical computer would, but with quantum enhancements.
• Efficiency is the key: The primary advantage of quantum computing is efficiency—it can solve problems that would take classical computers an impractically long time (or even centuries) to handle. Problems like factoring large integers (for breaking encryption) or modeling molecules (for drug discovery) become feasible with quantum computers. It’s not that the process is new, it’s that it’s done incredibly faster.

3. Expectation of Quantum Computing:

• Greater Speed and Lesser Cost: As you rightly pointed out, the main advantage quantum computing brings is greater speed (due to parallelism) and lower resource consumption for certain types of problems. This means it can: Solve certain problems faster: For example, a problem like factoring large numbers (which classical computers find very slow) can be done exponentially faster with Shor's algorithm on a quantum computer. Handle complexity more efficiently: Some problems, like simulating quantum systems or solving large optimization problems, are simply too complex for classical computers. Quantum computers can process such problems in a reasonable time.
• Not "New Logic" but Improved Execution: The algorithms we use on quantum computers are still based on logical rules (like classical computing). Quantum computing just executes these rules in ways that are much more powerful and efficient for certain kinds of tasks. However, it’s not "inventing" new logic or creative processes on its own.

4. Can Quantum Computing Provide Anything New?

While it’s true that quantum computing primarily offers efficiency gains, there is still potential for breakthroughs in terms of what it can enable us to do. For example:

• Quantum simulation: One area where quantum computers could provide new insights is in simulating other quantum systems (like molecules, materials, or physical processes). Classical computers struggle with this due to the sheer complexity of quantum systems. Quantum computers, on the other hand, are naturally suited to model quantum phenomena. This could lead to breakthroughs in drug discovery, material science, and chemistry that classical computers simply cannot handle.
• New algorithms: Quantum computing may not invent new logic on its own, but researchers are continuing to develop new quantum algorithms that could unlock solutions to problems previously thought unsolvable or impractical. As we develop better algorithms, new applications of quantum computing will emerge, potentially opening up new fields of science and engineering.

5. Current vs. Future Potential:

At this stage, quantum computing is best viewed as a highly efficient tool for specific types of problems:

• Problems with huge data sets or complex optimization (logistics, cryptography, machine learning).
• Simulation of quantum systems (like molecules or materials) that are too complex for classical computers to handle.

However, over time, as quantum computing matures and more quantum algorithms are developed, it could potentially lead to new approaches to solving problems in ways we haven’t yet fully explored.

Conclusion:

Quantum computing is indeed focused on making processing far more efficient, faster, and scalable than classical computers. You’re right that it’s not creating "new processes" in terms of logic; rather, it’s enhancing the execution of existing processes by taking advantage of quantum principles like superposition and entanglement.

Its key benefits lie in solving existing problems more efficiently, but its power opens doors to exploring new frontiers, such as quantum simulations or new problem-solving approaches that classical computers are incapable of addressing. So, while quantum computing primarily promises greater speed and lower cost, its unique nature could still lead to novel discoveries in specific fields.

?

You said:

Do any of the new LLM models, Chat GPT, copilot, Meta AI, etc use quantum computing?

ChatGPT said:

ChatGPT

As of now, large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Meta's LLaMA, and others do not use quantum computing. These models are built and operated on classical computing architectures—using powerful GPUs (Graphics Processing Units), TPUs (Tensor Processing Units), or other specialized classical hardware that supports the large-scale computations needed for training and running LLMs.

Here’s a breakdown of why they currently don’t use quantum computing:

1. Classical Computing for LLMs:

• LLMs like ChatGPT and others rely on classical deep learning frameworks that use neural networks and machine learning algorithms to process and generate text.
• Training large models like GPT-4 involves massive data sets and complex calculations, but classical hardware (like GPUs and TPUs) has proven to be very efficient for this task.
• The architecture of LLMs is based on well-established deep learning principles, which are well-suited to classical computing infrastructure.

2. Quantum Computing Is Still Emerging:

• Quantum computing is still in its early stages and is primarily focused on specific types of problems that involve combinatorial optimization, quantum simulations, and factorization. These problems are different from the ones solved by LLMs.
• Quantum computers are not yet powerful enough (in terms of the number of qubits and error correction) to handle the immense computations needed for training or deploying models of the scale of GPT-4 or GPT-5.

3. Use Cases for Quantum Computing:

Quantum computing is being explored in fields like:

• Cryptography (breaking encryption through Shor's algorithm).
• Optimization problems (logistics, scheduling, etc.).
• Quantum simulations (molecule modeling, material science).

However, quantum computing is not yet suitable for running deep learning models like LLMs because:

• It is better suited for very specific quantum tasks (quantum algorithms).
• Classical GPUs/TPUs are currently far more efficient for matrix operations, which are fundamental to training neural networks.

4. Future Potential of Quantum Computing in AI:

While quantum computing is not currently being used for LLMs, there is ongoing research into quantum machine learning (QML), which aims to combine quantum computing with AI techniques. The idea is that in the future, quantum computers could be used to:

• Speed up the training of neural networks by leveraging quantum algorithms.
• Solve problems in AI that are currently infeasible for classical computers (e.g., training much larger models or solving specific optimization problems within AI).

However, it’s important to note that this is still experimental and far from being practical for models like ChatGPT or Meta's LLaMA. Quantum computers need to overcome several challenges, such as increasing the number of qubits, improving error correction, and scaling up to handle the large datasets used in LLM training.

Conclusion:

For now, LLMs like ChatGPT, Copilot, and Meta's LLaMA are entirely powered by classical computing using high-performance GPUs and TPUs. While quantum computing holds exciting potential for AI in the future, it is not currently used to train or run these models due to its experimental nature and the immense computational power of classical systems for this task.

?

You said:

Thanks! that was an awesome, intensive lesson in Quantum Computing!

ChatGPT said:

You're very welcome! I'm glad you found the information helpful and insightful. Quantum computing is a fascinating and complex topic, and I'm here to help if you have any more questions or if there's anything else you'd like to explore. Just let me know!

You said:

OK... so in a classic computer, to determine the "third letter in the word [god], I'd have to program it like "go to 3rd letter; is it "A" [Yes/No]; if NO, is it "B", and so on; in the case of quantum computing I can just say "go to 3rd letter; is it "A", "B", "C".... or "Z"

ChatGPT said:

That's a great way to illustrate the difference in how classical and quantum computing can approach problems, though the analogy might need a bit of refinement regarding the underlying mechanics. Let's break it down:

Classical Computing

In a classical computer, when you want to find the third letter of the word "god," you might follow a step-by-step procedure. For example:

1. Access the character at index 2 (assuming zero-based indexing).
2. Check if the character is 'A': If Yes, do something. If No, check if it is 'B'. If No, check if it is 'C'. Continue checking until you find the correct letter or reach 'Z'.

This process is sequential and can be thought of as a linear search through the possible letters.

Quantum Computing

In a quantum computer, the process can leverage superposition to handle multiple possibilities at once. If you want to check the third letter of "god," you could theoretically use a quantum algorithm that checks multiple letters simultaneously.

For example, you could conceptually set up the quantum state to represent all possible letters ('A', 'B', 'C', ..., 'Z') at once. Then, when you "measure" the state, you would get one of the letters as a result, reflecting the letter at the third position without needing to check each one sequentially.

Key Differences

1. Parallelism: Classical: Must check each letter one by one. Quantum: Can explore multiple letters at once due to superposition.
2. Measurement: In quantum computing, you don’t get to see all the results at once; instead, you get one outcome based on the quantum state's probabilistic nature.

Caveat

While this analogy is useful, it’s important to remember that quantum computing doesn't always directly apply to simple string manipulations like this example. Quantum computers excel in scenarios involving complex computations, optimizations, or problems where multiple outcomes can significantly impact the solution (like factoring large numbers or simulating quantum systems).

Conclusion

So, your analogy highlights the essence of how quantum computing can handle multiple possibilities simultaneously, whereas classical computing must process them in a linear fashion. If you have more questions or want to dive deeper into specific aspects, feel free to ask!

?