“Guns don’t kill, people kill.” Sure, but… people with guns kill.

“Guns don’t kill, people kill.” Sure, but… people with guns kill.

This blog is updated from one posted on mintzberg.org/blog on 25 October 2015, under the title “Do the people of America have the right to bear nuclear arms?”

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution gives the people of America “the right to keep and bear arms.” Companies that sell arms thus make a great deal of money, the consequences be damned. So here is a conversation I fantasize having with the people who run the National Rifle Association.

“Do the people of America have the right to bear nuclear arms, say in a shopping bag?”

And they reply: “Are you some sort of nut?”

To which I retort: “Not at all. This is the answer I expected. We have now established the basic point: that a line has to be drawn somewhere. Where do you draw it: between nuclear bombs and cluster bombs? cluster bombs and automatic weapons? automatic weapons and handguns?” (A friend who hunts tells me that a one-shot rifle is all he needs. But he hunts deer, not people.)

I draw the line between guns and knives because, with knives in every kitchen, it’s tough to control them. (Handguns account for far more murders in the United States than do knives.) The right to bear arms may have made some sense when muskets were the only arms available, and took time to reload, with no 911 to call. But technology has moved on: now we have arms that can mass kill as fast as anyone can dial 9-1-1.

Here’s another mantra of the gun lobby: “Guns don’t kill; people kill.” Actually, people with guns kill, whether a toddler who mistakenly shoots a sibling or a lunatic in a hotel room who wantonly murders many people. (In total, on average, 93 Americans will die from gun violence today.)

Then there is the mantra that “We need more guns, not less”, presumably so that an innocent bystander can be ready to kill some killer. Can you remember the last time you heard that an innocent bystander killed a killer? In contrast, today may well be the latest time an innocent bystander was killed by a killer.

A young woman, traumatized by witnessing a mass killing, mouthed this mantra to a TV reporter. So why didn’t she have a gun in her pocket, finger on the trigger ready to kill him? After all, she could have bought one just as easily as he did. OK, so she didn’t expect a mass killing in her neighborhood. But fear not (really fear yes): with this attitude, one can’t be far away.

And here is a truly true fact: In the official copy of the Second Amendment, kept in the National Archives, this right to bear arms is qualified: “...a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Like the Swiss who, in case of hostilities, keep their one rifle in a closet, tightly regulated, Americans were given the right to bear arms for the sake of security, not murder, not even for the profit of private companies. 

So what’s going on here? Can people be that mindless, or that manipulated? It looks to be both. The Tea Party website used to have the following on its list of “Non-negotiable Core Beliefs”: “Gun ownership is sacred” and “Special interests must be eliminated.” The gun lobby is apparently not a special interest! And think about the ability of special interests to use the media to manipulate the minds of millions, including that young woman.

Can’t get rid of guns? How about getting rid of the right to take them anywhere? Better still, how about a constitutional amendment that puts a "not" in there somewhere? Dream on. Let’s stop kidding ourselves. This is not about buying, keeping, or transporting guns. It’s about bribery. When the Supreme Court granted corporations, as “persons” in the law, the right to make political donations to their hearts’ content, it legalized bribery. With these donations came the lop-sided lobbying that now dominates Congress, and is destroying the country’s renowned democracy. Guns are just the most blatant example of how the decent folks of America have lost control of their country.

? Henry Mintzberg 2017, 2015. To go deeper into this world out of whack, see my book Rebalancing Society https://www.amazon.ca/Rebalancing-Society-Radical-Renewal-Beyond/dp/1626....

Follow this TWOG on Twitter @mintzberg141, or receive the blogs directly in your inbox by subscribing here. To help disseminate these blogs, we also have a Facebook page and a LinkedIn page.

Miguel Hortiguela

Freelance Photographer, Writer

7 年

Words may be all we have to combat insanity, and they may fall on deaf ears, but words are also very powerful, otherwise, why would there be a constitutionally enshrined right to Free Speach. We may be at a point in history where logic and sound arguments are finding it difficult to make themselves heard, but Henry Mintzberg provides prime examples of both, in this piece.

回复
Kathleen Tan (IHRP-SP/ ACTA)

Certified HR Professional | Organization Transformation & Talent Development Strategist | Focused on Culture, Growth, and Innovation Searching for Brave individual to partner us to reimagine HR Tech in Healthcare

7 年

Singaporeans are glad that no one should possess such killing weapons

回复
Jacob Clausen

Lektor og faglig leder af skole - og fritidsspecialiseringen p? p?dagoguddannelsen at K?benhavns Professionsh?jskole

7 年

A great piece on an unfathomable and horrifying part of USA and its identity. As a Danish citizen I have never understood (and never will) the American logic in regards to guns exemplified by NRA.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Henry Mintzberg的更多文章

  • Time for the next Reformation?

    Time for the next Reformation?

    The closest model for the kind of change that the world needs now is probably the Reformation of the 16th century.

  • Let's get clever!

    Let's get clever!

    What’s the use of occupying Wall Street? It’s the behaviors behind the closed doors of Wall Street that are the…

  • The Biggest Joke in Climate Change

    The Biggest Joke in Climate Change

    Here we have the biggest joke in climate change. But climate change is no joke, so we had better stop planning and…

    1 条评论
  • The Extremists versus the Moderates

    The Extremists versus the Moderates

    Yet again there is a cease fire in the Middle East. Yet again nothing will change, at least until this conflict is…

    1 条评论
  • RebalancingSociety.org is up

    RebalancingSociety.org is up

    RebalancingSociety.org is now up, thirst years in the making.

  • PANDEMIC AND POLLUTION

    PANDEMIC AND POLLUTION

    Revised 19 November, 7 December 2020, 7 January and 5 March 2021 Overview The orthodoxies of administration and the…

  • Hoping for the best is not an acceptable strategy

    Hoping for the best is not an acceptable strategy

    GETTING PAST THE PANDEMIC Or, read the full story. Follow this TWOG on Twitter @mintzberg141, or receive the blogs…

    1 条评论
  • Zoom à tout prix? Pas si vite!

    Zoom à tout prix? Pas si vite!

    Coécrit avec Hanieh Mohammadi, doctorante à la Faculté de gestion Désautels de l’Université McGill Nous sommes entichés…

  • Where has all the judgement gone?

    Where has all the judgement gone?

    With Dulcie Naimer, and thanks to Pete Seeger (hear him or sing along) Where has all the judgement gone? Long time…

  • Wishing us all a happier new year… with 2021 vision

    Wishing us all a happier new year… with 2021 vision

    2020 was not a good year for vision, mine included. In April, I drafted a view of this pandemic intended to open up…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了