A Guide to Crisis Communications: Part 4 - Take Accountability
If you have read Part 3 of this series, then the next step after ensuring your spokesperson is able and prepared, you need to take ownership of the situation, i.e. take accountability.
There are clear steps to be accountable, namely:
When faced with a difficult situation or questions, most people are defensive and when this plays out on a public stage, constant rebuttals and trading insults only incites and prolongs media coverage.
Remember, the media loves scandals, it's what gets them the clicks. Take a different approach and you will reap rewards.
A willingness to take responsibility for possible errors in practice, policy or judgement shows a desire to correct the situation. Demonstrate a clear path toward “business as usual.”
This approach, particularly taken on by the CEO, can also provide another opportunity to own the narrative and reiterate the overarching organisational mission or values.?
In addition to what went wrong, it is important to:
?? Show any impact it has had on parties responsible
?? Share the steps that have been taken to address the crisis?
?? Outline changes to policy and procedure (if any) that was the result of the crisis?
While corporate apologies are common today, they are not a magic solution that will close the case.
The CEO and spokesperson, Oscar Munoz put out two defiant statements. He eventually apologised but few will forget that he first blamed the victim and praised the flight crew. Within just three days, of the incident, United lost an estimated $255 million in market cap.
领英推荐
While few crisis incidents are as globally viral and high-profile as the above. Remember, there are rules to issuing an apology:?
In the end, it more than just about an apology. Company spokespersons must demonstrate that they have an understanding of what and where things went wrong and take a part or all of the responsibility for it.
Without this, apologies can feel fake. You are better off by being transparent with the negative or unsavoury details in order to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the issue.
Here's some tips on what NOT TO SAY in an apology:
Over the last hundred years, companies have been reluctant to be accountable because of fear of litigation. But I believe you can avoid litigation if you approach the crisis sincerely.
However, you need to be careful and if you stick by your corporate and personal values, you'll create a winning situation out of a difficult one.
Some of the more common crisis issues, particularly HR-related ones, can be defended by a clear set of corporate policies.
While this will not prevent misconduct, it can help the organisation communicate that workforce expectations have been made clear and that certain acts are in direct violation.
Posting the guidelines on the company website can also reinforce the notion that you are committed to the values reflected.
Stay tuned for the conclusion of this series tomorrow where I will share how you can start strategising your crisis response.
Comment below if you have any questions.