GST implications on foreign bank charges
We intend to apprise you on recent disputes being raised by revenue regarding GST implications on bank charges paid by Indian exporters & importers to foreign banks relating to forwarding documents and collecting/remitting payments.
领英推荐
NITYA Comments: Section 2(93) of the CGST Act defines ‘recipient of service’ to mean person liable to pay consideration. In this transaction, foreign importer or Indian banks approach foreign banks to facilitate remittance. Indian exporters have no privity of contract with foreign banks. Indian exporter will not become service recipient merely because it bears bank charges.
In several rulings, CESTAT held that no Service Tax is payable under RCM by Indian exporters / importers in such cases. Trade Notice issued in Service Tax regime and FAQs issued by CBIC under GST regime also support this view. However, there is one High Court and one CESTAT ruling stating the contrary. Notably, SLP is pending before the Supreme Court against adverse CESTAT ruling. Indian exporters & importers are not liable to pay GST for aforesaid reasons. However, they can take a commercial call to pay GST on such services and claim ITC thereof.
Hope you find this an interesting read! Please feel free to share your comments / feedback.
Tax Professional, Best Selling Author
1 年This is an industry issue. Just for my understanding, how the accounts are going to be settled in the books of the Indian exporters unless the entire bankcharges (be it kept by overseas bankers or Indian bankers) are booked in its books?