The Grumpy Banker: When Salesforce Meets Resting Skeptic Face
Pamela Hannett
VP @ Liberty Bank #womeninleadership #womenintech #salesforce #womeninbanking
Salesforce is a powerhouse tool that can revolutionize how financial institutions manage customer relationships, streamline operations, and harness data for smarter decision-making. But no matter how many bells and whistles your Salesforce implementation has, there’s one thing that can turn the whole project from a shining success to a simmering failure: one person with a bad attitude. It sounds dramatic, but trust me, in the world of software implementation, a single grumpy employee can do more damage than a server crash during go-live.
At first, it doesn’t seem like a big deal. After all, it’s just one person, right? But negative energy is contagious. It’s like that one person at a dinner party who insists that the food tastes terrible—soon enough, everyone else starts doubting the meal. In the case of Salesforce, that one negative individual can undermine the entire initiative, often without realizing the magnitude of their influence.
You see, Salesforce isn't just a piece of software—it's a shift in how a business operates. And like any change, it’s met with some level of resistance. That resistance can be perfectly normal, but when it manifests in vocal pessimism, it spreads faster than a viral TikTok video. A single person complaining about how complicated the system is, how unhelpful the training materials are, or how much they "just don’t like" change, can have a ripple effect on the rest of the team. Suddenly, the early adopters are questioning their excitement, and the “I’ll-just-see-how-it-goes” folks are leaning in to hear more of the doom and gloom.
In banking, this resistance is especially potent because employees are deeply entrenched in established workflows and legacy systems. Employees in retail banking, commercial banking, mortgage lending, or wealth management are often used to managing relationships and transactions manually, with a paper trail or outdated core bolt on CRM systems. So, when someone voices concerns about how “this Salesforce thing” is going to upend their established routine, it has a much stronger impact.
That negative person doesn’t just stop at complaining—they can also start unconsciously spreading misinformation. Maybe they’ve misunderstood how a feature works, or maybe they’re simply misinformed, but suddenly, they’ve created an alternate reality where Salesforce is "too complicated" or "not secure enough" for banking applications. This kind of chatter can be far-reaching in a financial institution, especially in the tightly regulated world of banking where any hiccup in compliance or security is a major red flag. Their doubts start to chip away at the team's confidence, and before you know it, the whole team is second-guessing their commitment to the platform.
The damage is even worse when that negative energy stifles collaboration. Salesforce is all about streamlining operations, breaking down silos, and improving communication across departments. But when one person refuses to engage or sabotages group efforts with constant complaints, it affects everyone. For example, a banker in retail might push back against the new lead management process, while a wealth management advisor might doubt how Salesforce will improve client tracking. Instead of collaborating on creative solutions and adapting workflows, the team ends up bogged down by constant resistance, making the implementation process feel more like a battle than an opportunity.
领英推荐
Now, let’s talk about leadership. In banking, successful Salesforce adoption isn’t just about rolling out a shiny new CRM tool—it’s about getting buy-in from key stakeholders across departments, including IT, risk, compliance, retail banking, commercial banking and wealth management. When a negative individual starts spreading their doubts, it forces leadership to spend an inordinate amount of time managing that person’s issues. Instead of focusing on motivating the team, keeping the project on track, and addressing larger strategic objectives, leadership is pulled into a one-on-one with the resistant person, trying to talk them off the ledge. It’s a time drain that could be better spent guiding the project forward.
What’s more, the negative person can inadvertently delay the entire project. If they’re hesitant to adopt the platform or slow down training because they feel "the system won't work for us," it impacts everyone else. These delays can result in missed deadlines, increased project costs, and more pressure on employees who are trying to meet their targets while juggling a new system.
The truth is that Salesforce can be a game-changer for banks and credit unions, allowing them to unlock a wealth of opportunities for customer/member engagement, operational efficiency, and data-driven decision-making. In the end though, the grumpy employee may not be the sole cause of Salesforce failure, but they can certainly make the journey more difficult.
So how can you prevent this? Well, it’s not about banning negative people or issuing an edict to “be more positive”—after all, that’s about as effective as telling someone to “just relax” during a stressful situation. The real key is early intervention. Open communication is crucial, as is addressing concerns before they snowball into bigger problems. Setting clear expectations and emphasizing the benefits of the new system can help ease anxieties. And ensuring that the team is supported with proper training and resources will go a long way in mitigating the fear of change.
But perhaps the most important strategy is to find and empower the positive people. The ones who are excited, who see the potential, and who are willing to roll up their sleeves and help others get onboard. Positive energy is just as contagious as negativity, and when the majority of the team is engaged and ready to learn, the one bad apple will have a much harder time spoiling the bunch.
Like the weather, we can’t always control it, but we can certainly prepare for it. And if all else fails, maybe it’s time to hand them a shiny new CRM dashboard and let them see how easy it really is—after all, a little success might be the best cure for negativity.
Associate Principal Consultant | nCino Architect | 7x nCino Certified | Certified Salesforce Administrator & Business Analyst | 5x nCino Community Champion
2 个月Thanks for talking about this. It’s an all to common challenge that comes up during implementation of anything new, CRM or new business process. I’ve found that with challenger individuals it’s important to be empathetic and listen to their concerns. Often they’re influential and not solely because one bad apple poisons the bunch. Can it take up valuable time focusing on more strategic project goals - absolutely. However, if the potential impact of the challenger is significant then the time working with them to identify and address their concerns in meaningful ways would be well spent. In fact, engaging with them in an opportunity to bring them into the fold and convert them from challenger to champion.
Helping Companies grow and get to the next level.
3 个月I am sorry but this is very short sighted and does not address many issues surrounding CRM implementations. First CRM systems have a high failure rate historically. The lack of administrative help and data hygeine are large contributing factors and also lead to that grouchy employee. Banks also have other challenges. First they lock down their networking. Security concerns are justifiable reasons but they tend to be done in overkill mode. Result is an application that should be easy to use, now is clumsy with more reliance on manual input. Banks are resistance due cost and security concerns about adding on programs that would automate many of the processes. Again, the employee is grumpy because you are making the application extremly difficult to use. One of the first thing in system design is to listen to the end user. This is rarely done and CRM systems are designed for the benefit of management and oversight of line people. Again, employees get grouchy because obvious design elements are messed up. As I said, you are making assumptions that are supported in reality. As we move into a more data driven world, there is going to be a need to address frustrations with CRM systems. CRM systems are a gold mine of data.
Brett Arsta
3 个月What about real and honest feedback? Is Salesforce the only option? Is it for the small to midsize start up? How many people does it take to implement and oversee in addition to the technology stack? Does your real personal sales force find it easy to use or do they make up the information to only satisfy job requirements? I’ve been with companies who used it well and not so well as well as other CRMs that are better for the stage and complexity of the company. Just my 2 cents.