The GROW Model: A Guide to Empowering Conversations in Coaching
Simon Minett
I help individuals, teams and businesses transform and perform. Business Advisor | Executive Coach | Strategy | Sales GTM | Sales Operations | Transformation | Fractional CxO | Consulting
If you have ever studied the history of executive coaching and about how effective coaching conversations are structured, chances are you’ve come across the GROW model. Developed by Sir John Whitmore, GROW stands for Goal, Reality, Options, and Will, and it's a straightforward yet powerful framework that helps individuals and teams clarify objectives, identify obstacles, and determine actionable steps forward.
A Brief History of the GROW Model
The GROW model emerged in the 1980s, during a time when executive coaching was taking root in the corporate world. Sir John Whitmore, along with his colleagues at Performance Consultants International, adapted concepts from sports coaching to create a framework that could help executives maximize their potential. Inspired by Timothy Gallwey’s work on the "inner game" of tennis, Whitmore recognized that effective coaching involved unlocking a person’s own potential rather than directing or telling them what to do (Whitmore, 2017).
Breaking Down the GROW Model
Impact on Executive Coaching
The GROW model has had a profound impact on executive coaching, providing a simple yet effective structure that encourages self-directed learning. It’s often seen as the foundational tool that made coaching accessible to a broader audience beyond sports, making it popular in business and personal development contexts. By focusing on awareness and responsibility, GROW helps executives move from feeling overwhelmed by problems to finding solutions themselves.
Criticisms and Alternatives
While the GROW model is praised for its simplicity, it has also faced criticism for being too linear (Cox, Bachkirova, & Clutterbuck, 2014). Real-life coaching scenarios can be more complex and may require coaches to move fluidly between different stages rather than follow a strict sequence. Some have also argued that GROW lacks depth in emotional exploration, which may limit its effectiveness when dealing with deeply rooted personal issues.
Alternatives to the GROW model include frameworks like CLEAR (Contracting, Listening, Exploring, Action, Review) (Hawkins, 2012), which places a greater emphasis on relationship-building and active listening, and OSKAR (Outcome, Scaling, Know-How, Affirm & Action, Review) (Jackson & McKergow, 2007), which is more solution-focused and integrates elements like positive reinforcement and reflection. These alternatives can be useful for coaches looking for different tools that offer more flexibility or depth depending on the coachee’s needs.
Whitmore's GROW model provided a structured linear pathway, and is a good starting point in the study of coaching, but leadership development and behavioural change is often more emergent, adaptive and non-linear in nature. Business environments are complex, leaders need to be able to pivot and adapt to changing situations, coaching should aim to improve the skills to understand and dynamically adapt. The reflective practice of coaching will develop new learnings and insights that will develop skills and capabilities and new challenges and goals will appear along the journey.
The Power of Simplicity
Ultimately, the GROW model’s strength lies in its simplicity. It helps individuals navigate through uncertainty by breaking down challenges into manageable parts, facilitating conversations that drive clarity, ownership, and action. Whether you're a coach or just someone looking to have more empowering conversations, GROW is a valuable starting point—but like any tool, it’s most effective when adapted thoughtfully to fit the context and the development of the client.
References
Owner at The Wild Workplace | Principal Business Psychologist | Leader Endurance Coach & Mentor Stepping Up Courage, Curiousity & Top Explorer Mentality | Walking With Leaders 1-2-1 Prog MSc BSc CPBP FIoL APIOL RQTU
2 周As GROW wasnt purely Whitmores design, towards the end of his career/life, he spent much consulting time re-addressing/clarifying what the combined thinking was behind the models design, what it was really designed for & how it could be better used/understood beyond its linear interpretation. See link below; https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/business/21064050.interview-sir-john-whitmore-shares-thoughts-coaching-grow-model/
Nicely thought through and presented, Simon - thanks! Am a big fan of the power of simplicity, but I agree that over-adherence to linear models can often get in the way of growth.