Green was hit by social reality. How it can bounce back.
Vincent Fierens
Senior strategist | Building future-proof strategies | Previously Nike, Orange, Triodos, VML/WPP
Green parties around Europe are in free fall. Yes, green might do a better job communicating a welcoming green future – a vision that feels both aspirational and affordable to all. Yet beyond the alarming truth that climate scientists repeat at the left, and climate change denial at the right lies an even more formidable reality. A reality we all share but no one addresses: preparing ourselves for climate resilience
Why is support for green low while climate action is so urgent? How can green come back to relevance?
Reality Check
Much of what the green movement asked in the past 30 years has moved into EU and national legislation, particularly through decarbonisation policies
Decarbonisation also is just one side of the climate coin. It might slow down climate change, but the genie is out of the bottle. Natural disasters are already hitting vulnerable communities harder, most housing is not adapted to summer temperatures, storms or floods, while in 2023 over 47.000 people died in Europe just due to extreme heat.
It might slow down climate change, but the genie is out of the bottle.
A Simple Story
So far, the green movement could do with one proposition to attract young urban progressives, middle-aged eco-conscious citizens, educators and academics, social justice activists and the creative and cultural communities. The story was simple: science shows the urgency and we need to act now to avoid disaster in the long term. The long-term though has become today's reality.
The story is even more complicated to win over the working class in carbon-intensive industries, rural farming communities, low-income urban populations, older age groups and skeptical conservatives. For those groups the EU Green Deal framed the story as "A Greener Future for All: No One Left Behind". A promise of a more prosperous, more healthy home for every single group in society.
Break Through the Noise
Delivering any story requires grabbing attention first. Unfortunately, cognitive science shows that people under pressure just focus on immediate concerns and easy explanations. The New Yorker investigated why working-class Americans drift to Trump. One quote summarizes it well: "Right now, capitalism has people working so hard - two, three jobs trying to survive - that they can't even lift up their heads to get the information."
Prima mangiare, poi filosofare. Most of us won’t listen to future disasters. Yet a decent job to live a good life is not what we associate with green. It’s at its core a social story.
Prima mangiare, poi filosofare.
What green story will be heard by those further away from green? And how to deliver it?
领英推荐
Hands-On Green
The future is already here — it's just not evenly distributed yet. An old insight may help rethink green, as climate reality is pushing local vulnerable communities around the world to prepare for climate resilience now. Phoenix Arizona for instance offers hands-on learning, being the fastest-growing city in the U.S. and a near-desert city facing severe challenges of water scarcity and extreme heat.
Although Arizona has been a Republican stronghold, climate change has created pragmatism that turns out to be deeply green. The driving idea is to prepare Phoenix for climate resilience soon. The city delivers concrete green initiatives demonstrating benefits to every single group in society:
Many more examples exist such as Canada’s carbon pricing and rebate, New Zealand’s circular economy model and South Korea’s Green New Deal. All have one thing in common: they drive hands-on initiatives that make green benefits tangible for more people in local communities.
The Way Forward
So, green remains vital, yet it can prove its relevance to more people through building wider climate-resilient communities. In doing so, green will demonstrate to be more hands-on, connecting, inclusive, inviting collaboration with the adversary from the past. Not green as a lifestyle for earlier believers, but green that acknowledges hard times for vulnerable communities and works harder to ensure a better life for the wider middle class.?
Green might lead by seeing the opposite opinion as an invitation to empathize and learn, linking with wider civil society including small shopkeepers, self-employed and businesses. It might champion deliberative democracy and foster genuine citizen and stakeholder participation
In this way, green will connect with new, unreached audiences and find itself reshaped, while moving the broader community from old ways of working to new resilience. Ultimately, green can make both green frontrunners and the working and middle class feel at home in a new, better community.
Green that acknowledges hard times for vulnerable communities and works harder to ensure a better life for the wider middle class.?
#climatechangeisreal #climatechange #climateaction #climatereality #climateresilience #greenmovement #green
Owner RAM communication "from strategy to design"
4 个月Humanity is responsible for the climate change, but we still allow that th populations grows and grows. Every human changes clean air just by breathing into CO2... and we all want a good life and prosperity... so more and more to produce. From 8 billion to 10 billion and more. We put quota's on everything put not to the Homo Sapiens... who lost its Sapiens in the mean time. Ai is the next step with we are proud of, but a better world asks for more audacious solutions.
Freelance Brand Strategist
4 个月Thanks for sharing, Vincent! I agree that context calls for new narrative around green: it should work harder, get closer to communities, and overall, better relate to what really resonates with Europeans. Where ‘green' failed is that while rightfully ringing an alarm bell on climate crisis, it never managed to go beyond environmental activism, as you say: it was never pragmatic enough. It's about way more than our environment, it is about our lives, about our jobs, our homes, our wellbeing - all that matters here and now. Also, climate solutions are a hard sell. Canadian carbon pricing you mention was not clearly communicated to citizens and is now?used by opposition?as key argument against liberal government (https://www.conservative.ca/cpc/axe-the-tax/) and will likely become one of the reasons of upcoming political change in Canada. When not framed right, instead of a benefit, green can be easily seen as another burden. And nobody votes for that today.
Vice President - Client Services Director - Co-Leader at ICF Next E&A
4 个月Interesting angle - there is a serious disengagement from the public - voters have expressed it in several countries throughout EU. I believe the current global context, the inflation, insecurity and many other factors create a big distance between the ?green project?? and our day to day concerns. Also I believe it is still seen as an elite project (bio products are still expensive, electric cars etc) - how can Fighting Climate Change become affordable !? How can Fighting Climate Change become an actual SOCIAL concern? I reference to Adel Saebi
Procurement - Innovation - Packaging - Sustainability - Connector Be the change you want to see in the world.
4 个月Hey Vincent, mooi artikel. Ik had het er deze namiddag nog met mijn schoonbroer over. Hoe kan het toch dat Groen zo slecht presteert ondanks de enorme relevantie? Ik geloof ook dat het geheim ergens zit in de “what’s in it for me”? De meeste mensen zijn opportunisten. Korte termijn denkers en meerwaarde zoekers. (zelfs de begoede burger gaat graag scoren in de Action). Dus hoe kan groen kortetermijn meerwaarde brengen zou wel meer mensen doen bewegen. X4
Former Corporate Communications Manager
4 个月Hi Vincent, dank je, ik ben op reis en lees graag het artikel eens terug in Belgi? ??.