Green Claims: Is Hushing the New Washing?

As more cosmetic companies face backlash for greenwashing claims, many have responded by turning to ‘green-hushing’. This practice involves deliberately downplaying or even avoiding communication about a company’s environmental or sustainability efforts. While this might seem counterproductive in a market where eco-conscious consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable products, the motivation behind green-hushing is clear: companies want to avoid being accused of greenwashing, where they might be seen as making misleading or exaggerated claims about their environmental impact.

The fear of scrutiny from consumers, activists, or regulators is a powerful deterrent, as such accusations can lead to significant reputation damage or even legal challenges. However, green-hushing carries its own ‘laundry’ risks. By staying silent about their sustainability efforts, companies may face similar criticisms as those who engage in greenwashing. Worse still, green-hushing can create a cover for companies to avoid making meaningful sustainability changes, allowing them to continue unsustainable practices under the radar, all to save on costs. This avoidance can ultimately undermine the very progress that consumers and the industry are pushing for in the pursuit of more sustainable products.

Impact on Cosmetic Claims

In the cosmetics industry, green-hushing can significantly affect how brands communicate their product and ingredient claims, with several key implications:

• Understated Sustainability Efforts - Companies that engage in green-hushing often choose to downplay or completely withhold information about their sustainability initiatives, even when these efforts are significant. As a result, consumers may remain unaware of the environmental benefits associated with certain products, leading them to favour other brands that are more outspoken about their eco-friendliness, even if those claims lack substance. For example, a cosmetics company might make considerable investments in sustainable sourcing, such as using fair-trade cocoa butter or supporting biodiversity by sourcing palm oil from certified sustainable plantations. However, due to green-hushing, the brand might avoid promoting these efforts on their packaging or in marketing materials, fearing accusations of greenwashing if any aspect of their supply chain comes under scrutiny.

Claims Impact - This cautious approach can leave consumers in the dark about a brand’s genuine environmental practices, potentially driving them toward products that only appear more environmentally friendly but may not be. For instance, a company that is actively reducing its carbon footprint might choose not to highlight this achievement, while another brand with less substantial efforts might loudly advertise minor environmental initiatives, capturing the attention of eco-conscious consumers despite offering less overall benefit.

• Product Transparency Issues - Transparency is increasingly important to consumers, particularly in the cosmetics industry where ingredient sourcing and environmental impact are major concerns. Green-hushing can lead to a lack of transparency, as companies may be hesitant to share details about their sustainable ingredients or processes. This could create trust issues with consumers who prioritise eco-friendly and transparent brands. For example, a beauty company might develop a line of products using biodegradable packaging. However, instead of highlighting these features, they might only mention them briefly or not at all due to fears of being seen as "greenwashing."

Claims Impact - Consumers increasingly demand transparency, especially in the cosmetics industry, where there is heightened awareness of ingredient safety and environmental impact. When companies engage in green-hushing, they may appear less transparent, which can erode consumer trust. For instance, a brand that has moved to fully recyclable packaging but doesn't communicate this effort might lose customers to brands that are more vocal about even minimal sustainability efforts.

• Consumer Confusion - As some companies green-hush while others might still be engaging in greenwashing, consumers can be left confused about which brands truly prioritise sustainability. This confusion can hinder informed decision-making and may lead consumers to disengage from sustainability as a criterion for their purchases. For example, a skincare brand uses a new, sustainable ingredient sourced from renewable algae. If the brand engages in green-hushing, they might not highlight this innovation due to fears of being challenged on other less sustainable aspects of their business. Meanwhile, another brand might make vague claims like "natural" or "eco-friendly" without substantive backing.

Claims Impact - This discrepancy can confuse consumers, who might find it difficult to discern which products are genuinely better for the environment. Over time, this confusion could lead to consumer fatigue regarding sustainability claims, making them less likely to prioritise sustainability in their purchasing decisions.

• Regulatory Scrutiny - The cosmetics industry is facing increased regulatory scrutiny regarding product claims, including those related to sustainability and environmental impact. Companies practicing green-hushing might avoid potential legal risks associated with making bold environmental claims that could be challenged. However, they also miss out on the opportunity to differentiate themselves in a market where sustainability is increasingly important. For example, with increasing regulations around sustainability claims, such as the recent European Union's "Green Claims Initiative," which aims to combat misleading environmental claims, cosmetics brands might choose to avoid making any claims at all in order to steer clear of potential legal issues.

Claims Impact - While this cautious approach can prevent legal challenges, it also means that brands miss out on differentiating themselves in a market where sustainability is becoming a key purchasing factor. For example, a personal care company that has achieved significant reductions in water usage during production might avoid advertising this achievement due to the complexity of regulatory compliance, thereby losing an opportunity to appeal to environmentally conscious consumers.

• Competitive Disadvantage - Brands that practice green-hushing might find themselves at a competitive disadvantage. While they may be protecting themselves from accusations of greenwashing, they also miss out on marketing their sustainability credentials, which could appeal to a growing segment of eco-conscious consumers. An example here would be, a luxury skincare brand developing a line of products using upcycled ingredients (e.g., using byproducts from the food industry as raw materials for cosmetics). However, fearing the backlash of any claims being labeled as greenwashing, the brand might not market these products as sustainable.

Claims Impact - Brands that green-hush might lose out to competitors who are more vocal about their sustainability efforts, even if those efforts are less significant. For instance, a smaller brand that openly markets its use of organic ingredients might gain market share at the expense of the larger, more conservative brand, despite the latter's more comprehensive sustainability initiatives.

The Wash and The Hush - Balancing Green Claims

The cosmetics industry faces a significant challenge in finding the right balance between making authentic, substantiated claims about sustainability and avoiding the dangers of both greenwashing and green-hushing. On one hand, brands must ensure that their communications are transparent, precise, and honest, providing consumers with clear and accurate information about their environmental efforts. This means avoiding any exaggeration or omission that could mislead or confuse consumers. Loud isn’t always best, yet neither is silence.

On the other hand, companies must also navigate the risks associated with greenwashing claims—the act of making exaggerated or misleading claims about the environmental benefits of their products. At the same time, they must be cautious not to fall into the trap of green-hushing, where they downplay or completely avoid discussing their sustainability initiatives out of fear of backlash or scrutiny.

For cosmetic brands, this balance is crucial not only for maintaining credibility but also for standing out in an increasingly competitive market. By being more transparent and proactive in communicating their genuine sustainability efforts, companies can build trust with consumers who are becoming more eco-conscious and discerning in their purchasing decisions. Providing detailed information about sustainability efforts, even if they are ongoing or imperfect will help to navigate thus complex landscape. This approach not only helps cosmetic brands differentiate themselves but also positions them as leaders in the growing demand for environmentally responsible products. Ultimately, finding this middle ground is essential for companies to contribute positively to sustainability while meeting consumer expectations.

Ultimately, whether the efforts are big or small, making clear, verifiable, and compliant claims is crucial. By educating consumers not only on the importance of sustainability but also on the challenges that come with it, brands can empower them to make more informed decisions. This approach should help cosmetic companies steer clear of the pitfalls of both greenwashing and green-hushing while still taking advantage of the growing consumer demand for sustainable products.

For more Cosmetic Claims Insights please subscribe to this newsletter

Also follow my monthly Claims column with EuroCosmetics Magazine: https://www.eurocosmetics-mag.com/cosmetic-claims/ as well as my monthly article with BEAUTYSTREAMS: https://beautystreams.com

For an easy-to-read comprehensive look at Claims Development, the second edition of Help! I'm Covered in Adjectives and Claims & The Consumer, is available in both French and English? from all Amazon book outlets internationally, as well as Kobo e-books.