Greed ‘In a Word’ DESTROYS
I continue to be appalled at the recklessness and destruction of lives caused by the self-indulgent greed of a small group of people whose ethical compass must have been checked at the door. A select group of Private Equity (PE) firms and the executives of the publicly-traded companies that ‘Sell’ (and I use that term very, very loosely) to them have made the economic impact associated with the Covid-19 Pandemic far worse than it needed to be.
PE firms basically fit into two categories. Predatory and Partnering.
The first and by far the vast majority of Private Equity firms are PARTNERING. They are focused on bringing funding, expertise and professional business practices primarily to private companies where they see real opportunities for substantial growth. These PE firms and the executives of the company certainly do well, but they do so because the company is enabled. In these transactions virtually everyone benefits even if the changes required seem painful to some. Employment at these PE backed businesses grow substantially while opportunities are made available to a wide group of people. I’ve been involved in quite a few of these efforts and it is simply an exciting (albeit extremely intense) experience for everyone who understands why we are in business.
The second, while small in number, but enormous in dollar impact are PREDATORY. The partners at these firms actively hunt for publicly-traded companies that have the capability of taking on unsustainable levels of debt. The partners from these firms approach the company executives with a compelling, albeit completely unethical, proposal. They will offer to ‘buy’ the company by loading it up with debt. The company executives (and usually the Board of Directors who has to approve this) are guaranteed out-sized bonuses, payouts, and instant vesting of all stock in order to approve the acquisition. These Predatory PE firms take enormous ‘management fees’ from the company (often annually) and then drive draconian expense cuts throughout the organization so that it can make the debt payments as long as possible. The longer this goes, the more money the PE firm gets in fees and even has the possibility of selling it to yet another Predatory PE firm. Several dozen people make hundreds of millions of dollars while the tens of thousands of employees are left do more with less until the company declares bankruptcy. The banks that lend to these buyouts are no less culpable. They reap large fees for loans that have high interest rates with first rights of payout in the event of any asset sale.
Greed on a few people’s part (those with the power) explains more than half of the ‘WHY’ companies are not surviving this economic hit. However, this situation is a perpetual one. Every year there are upwards of a 100 of these PE owned bankruptcies. Let’s look at a few recent bankruptcy filings courtesy of Pitchbook analysis.[i]
- Hertz – Listed $1 Billion in Cash and $18.8 Billion in Debt. Most of the debt comes from a 2005 buyout by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (along with others) that loaded the company with debt. The PE firm (now in control of the company) paid itself $1 Billion six months after acquisition adding even more debt to Hertz.
- 24 Hour Fitness – Listed a $1.3 Billion debt load from a 2014 buyout by PE firm AEA Investors and the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan
- Neiman Marcus - $5 Billion in debt from one set of PE buyouts. Then the company was sold to another PE adding even more debt.
- J. Crew - $1.7 Billion in debt while TPG and Leonard Green & Partners pulled $760 million out of the firm in special ‘dividends’
I have chronicled a number of others over the years including the repeated ones we see in the casino, and CPG industries.
Debt not used to further the strategic position of a company sets it up for failure.
This situation continues and will continue as long as there is no real oversight of corporate executives. While the Board of Directors has that responsibility, it has been widely shown that they are too well compensated and far to dependent upon staying within the good graces of the CEO to provide any real control. The entire process of joining, remaining and being compensated for ‘serving’ on a board of directors MUST CHANGE or we will continue to watch tens of thousands of employees try their best to do what is right for the company only to watch it go out of business.
[i] Lewis, A. 2020, “Private equity-backed bankruptcies surged in May, but future might not be so bleak.” Pitchbook, June 5, 2020, (https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/private-equity-backed-bankruptcies-surged-in-may-but-future-might-not-be-so-bleak?sourceType=NEWSLETTER).
Dr. Chuck Bamford is a Strategy Consultant (www.bamfordassociates.com) and the author of 7 books including The Strategy Mindset 2.0 and two of the leading textbooks in both Strategy – 15th edition (Pearson) & Entrepreneurship – 3rd edition (McGraw-Hill – 4th edition release date is 1/2021).
He is an Adjunct Professor of Strategy at Duke University (Fuqua School of Business) where he teaches Strategy Implementation in the MBA and EMBA programs. Over the past 25 years he has been honored with 22 Professor of the Year awards including 12 Executive MBA Professor of the Year Awards. He was named a Noble Foundation Fellow in Teaching Excellence and a Poets & Quants Favorite Professor.
Please join us at our next Strategy Workshop which will be held in Boston, MA on August 18-19, 2021 at The University of Massachusetts Club – 32nd Floor (following social distancing guidelines). For information, please follow this link (https://www.eventbrite.com/e/designing-implementing-practical-strategy-boston-ma-tickets-85783874879) or reach out directly to us at: [email protected].
Image courtesy of Dream Deigns at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Operations Manager at AMAC LLC
4 年I have watched for 41 years how certain CEO's, Boards and certain acquiring PE groups how harmful they can be and then display a certain arrogance about them. I am thrilled you are addressing these issues for shareholders, employees and customers..........
Thanks for your thoughts, Chuck. I too thought they were all, or mostly, predatory. We don't hear the success stories. I'm glad there are good guys out there.
Senior Executive | 2X Software Exits | Board, CEO, CRO Advisor | AI & Revenue Transformation
4 年Glad this is being highlighted, as private equity ownership should be a growing field of strategic management and corporate governance research. Many PE firms may not be in either category. Instead of eroding value as predators or adding value as partners, many are just looking to financially engineer an exit by simply cutting costs and growing revenues. This is where it gets harder to assess value.
Elite Executive Recruiter (LI Top 1%) | Make Hiring Human | C-Suite, Finance, HR, Supply Chain, Marketing, Merchandising, Operations, Technology | Top LinkedIn Voice
4 年I appreciate the distinction between PARTNERING and PREDATORY. Most people think all private equity is predatory, but I have a similar view, that the vast majority of PE firms are partnering: they want to help fix and GROW the companies they acquire. My PE clients are amazing partners who become family friends with the founders of the companies they acquire. They provide funding when no bank would. They invest in leadership and people who will commit to growing the business. Great article.