Greece is Not a Threat to the Eurozone

Greece is Not a Threat to the Eurozone

Negotiating is a good thing. If you do not, then you never get what you deserve. But you need to be realistic about your strengths and how you go about doing it. In the case of Greece there is a popular claim that Greece represents a threat to the European and the worldwide economy. This is the card that the Greek government is playing in order to force other European countries to provide a different deal on the country’s debt and the measures that need to be implemented as part of reform efforts. The argument goes that if Greece defaults and exits the Eurozone then other countries might do so as well. That would be an economic disaster indeed, as the Euro-experiment would be most likely dead.

However, just yesterday, I had a discussion with a senior executive from one of the largest banks of the Western world. I asked him what would be the effect on the bank from a potential Greek exit from the euro. His response was “we would not even blink. Minimal.” I happen to agree with his assessment more broadly as I study the data and analyze the balance sheets of banks around the world.

Greece exiting the Eurozone was a very costly outcome up until 2012 and maybe 2013. But it is not anymore as other countries have implemented reforms and have already gotten out of recession. The data is clear. Up until 2013 yields of Italian, Portuguese and Spanish (IPS) government bonds exhibited a strong positive correlation with the yields of Greek government bonds. Using monthly data those correlations were extremely high, in many cases close to 0.8 or 0.9. The price of Greek government bonds went up, so did the price of IPS bonds. The price of Greek government bonds went down, so did the price of IPS bonds. Effectively what this meant was that investor perceptions about the probability of default of these governments were moving uniformly across all these countries. When investors perceived Greece to be more likely to default they also perceived Italy, Portugal and Spain more likely to do so.

This has changed profoundly in the last year. These correlations were close to zero in 2014 and have turned negative in 2015. Let me make this clear: an increase in the probability of Greek default is not associated any more with an increase in the probability of default by Italy, Portugal, or Spain. As you can see quite the opposite (blue line is the evolution of the yield on the 10-year Greek government bond starting from zero; purple line is on the 10-year Portuguese government bond. During the last year the former has increased by 50% relative to its value a year ago while the latter has decreased by 50% using Bloomberg data). As the probability of Greek default increases, the probability of a Portuguese default declines.

Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/GGGB10YR:IND

What is equally interesting is the fact that yields on IPS government bonds now exhibit an extremely high positive correlation with German government bonds. These correlations in 2014 were close to 0.99. Yields on German and IPS bonds are all declining while interest rates on Greek bonds are increasing.

Greece needs a new approach. To get something you have to give something. But in this case you could have a win-win situation if you maximize the gains from trade. So here is my proposal: the highest gains from trade would be for Greece to negotiate and get approval from its creditors to lower and stabilize tax rates on various economic assets and activities, especially on taxes that affect the lower and middle income households. That would give Greeks more money to repay their debts, consume, or invest for the future and restart the economy. The sharp increase in taxation has devastated the economy and this needs to stop.

In exchange, Greece should commit to accelerate the reforms that would increase the effectiveness of the public sector, remove labor market dysfunctions and the barriers to product market competition. These reforms could accelerate economic growth. And if that is not enough to satisfy the creditors then also tax the very rich of the country that have been long evading paying their fair share.

The good news is that this all makes economic sense. The problem is that it does not make political sense.

Diego Z.

Financial Reporting & Control Managment at Navios South American Logistics inc.- CPA

10 年

good post george but....where was the rescue money go.?.....see this ....https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-nBN9sW0AEhGOi.jpg

回复
Thava Thavanayagam

Chief Operating Officer - Management International Sri Lanka, Dean (Designate) Lakeland Higher Education. Sri Lanka

10 年

True. Greece is not a THREAT, but Eurozone is a THREAT to all EU Countries, big and small that joined for fantasy, ignoring its own sovereignty.

回复
Prof. Dr. Katrin Muff

Director & Professor with focus on Positive Impact Innovation & Business Sustainability Strategy | The Institute for Business Sustainability & Luiss Business School | President Positive Impact Rating

10 年

Very refreshing and important - thanks

回复
Michael Skapoullis

Entrepreneur | Startup advisor

10 年

Very true! Very nice article!

回复
Dimitris Bougidis

AVP Operational Risk & Performance Manager

10 年

Nice post and interesting comments. In my view, the drop of correlations was initiated in Jul/Aug of 2014 when the markets started to understand that the newly reshuffled cabinet was not going to implement with the same speed the agreed reforms, and this would eventually lead to a clash with the troika. This drop was accelerated a few months later when the greek goverment attempted unsuccesfully to access the markets and get rid of memorandum (the spike in the graph). This stalemate with the lenders forced goverment to bring the presidential election earlier and after failing to elect president to then call for snap elections.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

George Serafeim的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了