Happy Workplaces are More Successful

Happy Workplaces are More Successful

For the Korean edition of the Happy Manifesto, due to be published on 9th September, I've updated the section on the evidence that happy workplaces simply perform better. Here it is:

The research has been done and the evidence is in. There is a clear link, shown in many studies: companies that are great workplaces are more successful commercially.

Great workplaces perform better on the stock market

No alt text provided for this image

Alex Edmans, then at Wharton Business School at the University of Pennsylvania, analyzed the result of investing in the companies listed in the Great Place to Work listings over the last 25 years. His detailed econometric study found a difference, compared to the stock market, of 3.5% a year. An investment which would have returned $100,000 in a tracker fund would have achieved $236,000 from investing in companies that focus on creating great workplaces. [1]

Given the evidence, you might wonder why investment funds tend not to focus on how good a workplace is. Well, there is at least one that does: Jerome Dobson explains how he decided to create "a fund that only invested in organizations where employees were really happy", on the advice of the creator of the Best Companies to Work For list (the list used by Edmans for his analysis).[2]

Set up in 2005 with just $600,000, the Fund now manages $2 billion and has been rated in the top 1% of US investment funds for its ten year return. Its stated focus is clear: "The Parnassus Workplace Fund invests in companies with outstanding workplaces. The philosophy behind this fund is that companies whose employees love going to work will do better than companies with poor workplaces."

Of course it could be the case that a strongly performing company leads to strong engagement, rather than vice versa. Marcus Buckingham, previously of Gallup and now behind the ‘StrengthsFinder’ approach, ‘concludes from various longitudinal studies that it is engagement that leads to performance, and this is a four times stronger relationship than performance leading to engagement’[3].

Happy hospitals save lives

This is also true outside the commercial sector. The Kings Fund in London compared the levels of staff engagement in British hospital to a variety of factors. Few people are surprised to learn that patients were happy if staff were happy.

However it is also the case that less patients died when staff were happy and engaged. For every 96 people that died in hospitals were staff engagement was strongest, 103 died where staff engagement was weakest. That is equivalent to 5,000 deaths a year in the UK alone. Or 5,000 lives being saved from engaged workplace cultures. [4]

Gallup’s research has identified 12 core elements of employee engagement that they believe predict performance. These range from knowing what is expected of you to having the opportunity to do what you do best every day, from having a supervisor who seems to care about you to staff feeling their opinions count.

Clear benefits from happy and engaged staff

A wide range of surveys have identified clear benefits from happy and engaged staff:

·      Every 2% increase in how happy employees are leads to revenue growth of 1%, explains Daniel Goleman in his book Primal Leadership.[5]

·      A three year study of 41 global companies by Willis Tower Watson found “operating margins improved nearly 4% on average in organizations with high employee engagement levels and declined about 2% in those with low engagement levels.” They concluded that there is a “clear relationship between high levels of employee engagement and improved financial and operational results.”[6]

·      In 2017 Gallup found that great workplaces have earnings per share growth that is 4.3 times greater than competitors: They studied the performance of its Great Workplace award winners and found 115% growth in EPS, compared to 27% for competitors.[7]

These are only some of the many pieces of research that could be quoted. Again and again it has been shown that companies who engage their staff are more successful – whether measured in customer satisfaction, innovation, productivity or solid profitability and growth in share value.


[1] Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices, Alex Edmans, Journal of Financial Economics, 2011 https://faculty.london.edu/aedmans/Rowe.pdf

[2] The proof is in the profits: America’s happiest companies make more money: https://bit.ly/FastCoHappy

[3] Engage for Success, Macleod Report, 2009

[4] Staff Engagement Toolkit 2013, https://www.nhsemployers.org/~/media/Employers/Documents/SiteCollectionDocuments/staff-engagement-toolkit.pdf

[5] Primal Leadership, Daniel Goleman, HBR Press, 2013

[6]The Power of Three: Taking Engagement to New Heights”, Willis Tower Watson, June 2016

[7]State of the American Workplace Report” Gallup, 2017

No alt text provided for this image

Want to create a happy, productive workplace?

Check out our four day Happy Workplace leadership programme, now online, here.

Emma-Jane Daly

Interim Transformation, Strategic Change & Communications Leader I Leading change and transformation across purpose-led organisations

4 年

These statistics are so powerful Henry - and show why our focus and type of work is on the money, and not just fluffy stuff.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Henry Stewart ??的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了