Gravity’s Got Ahold of Me and AI Too!

Gravity’s Got Ahold of Me and AI Too!

In the ever-expanding cosmos of our thoughts and conversations, where the discourse around artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has become as ubiquitous as the air we breathe, there's a narrative that often goes untold. It's not just about whether these technologies will uplift or undo our world; it's about their dance with the very fabric of the universe — gravity. ?

AI, in its essence, seems to float above the physical, a realm of data and algorithms, unburdened by the gravitational chains that bind us. Yet, the servers, the silicon, and the electricity that pulse through the veins of this digital entity are anchored in the tangible, governed by the same universal laws that dictate the orbit of planets. It's a humbling realization that the physical infrastructure enabling AI's dreams of tomorrow is firmly planted on the ground by gravity.

As my family and I stared up into the cosmic silence of a night sky near the Mokelumne River, with them sleeping quietly, at 2 AM, there studded with stars which have whispered secrets for millennia, a thought occurred to me. Here (the eternal presence), beneath the celestial tapestry (which is the a universal infinitude regardless of day or night), lies a parallel between the invisible force that holds the universe together and the invisible codes that weave AI and Machine Learning into our moment as Homo sapiens. This thought, much like the unexpected turn in a journey that reveals a vista previously unseen, nudged me into contemplation that night.? Like Joe Rogan once said, “human beings are basically just really good at building better things.” It does seem to be a good definition for our species, and it has culminated with this next level of abstract AI thought and action, but what would Einstein think of all of this...? What would the most ingenious of all the great historic arts and sciences masters think?

But what if we cast our gaze further, beyond the confines of Earth, into the abyss of a black hole? Could AI exist in such a place where gravity defies all known laws, where time and space warp and weave into a tapestry unfathomable? Imagine, if you will, an AI adrift in the void, its power source a mystery, its purpose untethered from human ambition. Here, in the heart of darkness, would our creation continue to think, to learn, to exist? Or would it, like Icarus, find itself ill-equipped for the journey it has embarked upon?

This venture into the hypothetical serves not just as a mental exercise but as a beacon, guiding us back to the fundamental truths that govern all existence. AI, for all its complexity and potential, is not above the laws of physics. It is a creation of our ingenuity, yes, but it remains under the dominion of the universe's rules. Gravity, that age-old force that apples and galaxies alike cannot escape, also holds sway over the digital dreams we weave.

As we ponder the possibility of AI's survival in the extreme conditions of space, particularly near or within a black hole, we are reminded of the resilience and adaptability required for such an existence. The idea of AI, unpowered and drifting, challenges us to consider not just the technical but also the philosophical boundaries of what we create. It beckons us to question the very essence of existence and the parameters within which life, as we understand it, can function.

This reflection on AI and gravity — on the intersection of human ambition and cosmic law — invites us to ponder our place in the universe. It reminds us that, while we reach for the stars with our technology, we are still bound by the same principles that light up the night sky. In this contemplation, there's a certain beauty, a poetry that intertwines the physical with the metaphysical, the earthbound with the celestial.

As we navigate this journey, exploring the boundaries of technology and the universe, we are charting a course through uncharted waters. The conversation around AI and gravity, around the possibilities and limitations of our creations, is more than a technical discussion. It's a philosophical voyage that challenges us to rethink our relationship with the universe and with the technologies we birth into existence.

In sharing these musings, much like recounting a journey through ancient ruins or a night spent under the stars, we are invited to reflect on the bigger picture — and the smaller one too. It's a reminder that, in our quest to understand and utilize AI, we are also exploring the very principles that govern our existence. This narrative, debate, discussion, as woven from the threads of technology, physics, and philosophy, is rich with questions, awaiting more of our further exploration.

Mike Kyriacou

CEO at Kopernicus AI | 2 Exits | Industry Fellow / Educator: UC Berkeley, Stanford University

8 个月

Interesting musings Daniel Kramer! Of the many questions you pose, one of the easiest to answer is the first thing Einstein would say: The physical substrate or an organic or digital intelligence would, by Einstein's principles, always behave the same in *any* inertial reference frame. So relative to an observer in the intelligence's frame of reference, being anywhere up to the event horizon of a black hole, things would operate the same way (.... I mean, expect for the spaghettification from gravitation tides ripping it all apart - but ASSIDE from that!) - they won't seen any difference. Of course someone NOT in that reference frame would see the intelligence slowing and slowing until thinking effectively stopped at the event horizon. Physics and the physical substrate would work exactly the same but would just slow to a more and more extreme extent. More broadly, if Einstein was impressed my compound interest - imagine how amazed he'd be about what emerges from combining the best neural network models with the world's entire body of knowledge - same curve but an even more impressive outcome!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了