GraphQL - Part 2 | REST vs GraphQL: Comparison
Shashank Vashist, PMP?
Enterprise Architect & Capability Practice Head at Inmorphis | Certified Blockchain Expert |TOGAF | Lean Six Sigma Green Belt | ServiceNow Certified Instructor | ServiceNow Rising Star 2024 & 2023
Understanding REST API
Representational State Transfer (REST) is an architectural style for designing networked applications. REST relies on a stateless, client-server communication protocol, primarily HTTP. Here are the key principles of REST:
Benefits of REST API
Understanding GraphQL
GraphQL is a query language for APIs and a runtime for executing those queries by using a type system you define for your data. Developed by Facebook in 2012 and released publicly in 2015, GraphQL offers a more flexible and efficient alternative to REST. Here are the core concepts:
Comparing GraphQL and REST
Key Differences
1.???? Data Fetching:
·??????REST: Fetches data from multiple endpoints, often requiring over-fetching or under-fetching of data.
·??????GraphQL: Fetches data through a single endpoint with precise queries, ensuring clients receive exactly what they request.
2.???? Schema and Type System:
·?????? REST: Typically does not enforce a formal schema, though some conventions and tools (like OpenAPI) can be used.
·?????? GraphQL: Enforces a strongly typed schema, enabling better validation, tooling, and documentation.
3.???? Request Structure:
·????? REST: Uses different endpoints for different types of resources and actions (e.g., /users, /posts).
·????? GraphQL: Uses a single endpoint with queries that specify exactly what data is needed, potentially combining multiple resources in one request.
4.???? Performance:
·????? REST: May lead to multiple HTTP requests to fetch related data, which can result in slower performance and higher network usage.
·????? GraphQL: Can reduce the number of requests by allowing clients to specify nested data requirements in a single query.
5.???? Flexibility and Evolution:
·????? REST: Adding or changing resources often involves modifying or adding new endpoints, which can be cumbersome.
·????? GraphQL: Adding new fields to types or new types to the schema does not affect existing queries, making it easier to evolve the API.
6.???? Error Handling:
·????? REST: Relies on HTTP status codes and error messages, which can vary in implementation.
·????? GraphQL: Provides a standardized way to return errors in the response, alongside partial data if applicable.
Both REST and GraphQL offer distinct advantages and are suited to different types of applications and requirements. REST is well-suited for simpler, more straightforward API needs where the interaction patterns are well understood and do not change frequently. It benefits from its simplicity, scalability, and widespread adoption.
GraphQL, on the other hand, is ideal for applications that require flexibility in data fetching and efficient network usage. It shines in scenarios with complex relationships between entities or where front-end developers need more control over the data they receive. The choice between REST and GraphQL depends on the specific needs of the project, including the complexity of data interactions, the need for real-time updates, and the development workflow preferences.
?