Graphisoft's Archicad 27 aims to put the fun back into BIM
Monica Schnitger
Explaining technology one designer, engineer, maker and boss at a time -- then summarizing for investors & suppliers
Last month, I spent time with the Graphisoft team in Budapest, ostensibly for the launch of the newest version of Archicad (27, of those keeping count) but really to get a glimpse into what the team there sees as the main issues facing architects, designers and their clients.?And that's not what you might think.
First, let’s cover the main advantages of BIM, building information modeling. The original concept, about 25 years ago, was to create a associative environment for AEC structures, like what we’d already had in the mechanical design world for a while at that point. Move a door, and the wall adjusts. Source that door from a specific vendor and have its attributes change, and all doors in the BIM model update. Need to count those doors? BIM can do that. We’ve always been able to design buildings using 2D CAD (and many happily do that); BIM was supposed to make life easier for architects and designers working on large, complex structures with many components, trades, and disciplines to keep track of. And then, of course, BIM was supposed to automatically spit out drawings, parts lists, tallies, and all of the paper that AEC projects generate.
Along the way, using BIM created new opportunities for architects and designers. We added more disciplines into BIM, enabled simulation and digital collaboration, and the sophisticated renderings made possible by software and computing innovations became expected deliverables. And then we sort of .... stalled. BIM models got too big to be practical, we never did get rid of all of that paper, and architects and designers felt like they were busy feeding the BIM-beast rather than being creative.
Graphisoft CEO Huw Roberts said that Archicad 27 aims to change that. Yes, Archicad 27 does all of the tech things, but is fun, too. He wants Archicad to be the best design platform for architects and engineers, an integrated platform of tools, services, support, and learning, enabling multidisciplinary collaboration in a flexible, open environment. All of that. But it should also put fun and creativity back into BIM. Go here?to see the details of the release —it covers much more than I can fit here— but my main takeaways are this:
What’s more interesting to me is how Graphisoft looks at parametric design, AI-assisted all-sorts-of-things, building lifecycle assessment, sustainable design, and simulation to improve how buildings are designed, built, and operated. Just a couple of examples (really, look at the video linked above for much more):
Like everyone else, Graphisoft is trying to figure out how to introduce artificial intelligence into its products. Its take is that AI has its best first use in conceptual design and created a?conceptual image generation tool that uses public-domain images to generate options for further refinement.
So, for example, we’re designing a modern-look office building with wood in the facade. Our concept is stacked, offset blocks; we send that off to the AI engine and get back several options, one of which is shown in Graphisoft's example, below.?
领英推荐
Before we leave the topic of AI, Graphisoft says it doesn't see AI replacing anyone, anytime soon. I unfortunately can't remember which Graphisoft-er told me this, but they see AI as helper technology, offering options (as does this ideation tool), and making preliminary guesses for humans to finalize.
Although I don’t write about it often, Graphisoft is more than Archicad. BIMcloud, BIMx, and DDScad enable it to address the broader building design ecosystem, while more robust integrations with other Nemetschek brands, like Solibri, Frilo, Risa, and Scia brands, allow it to compete head-to-head with the industry’s biggest player, Autodesk Revit. (More about that Nemetschek-ness of things in a separate post.)
That’s a lot.
What’s my take??In the greater scheme of things, Graphisoft is a smaller player working hard to gain international recognition (it really needs to crack the North American market) and has decided that “Enhancing your creative expression to infinity while taking the boring out of design” is the best way to go. I think it’s working. Simply automating what humans do is necessary but not exciting — yes, we need to generate drawings more quickly, change fonts easily, and all that. But what energizes people is being creative: how can they beat their competitors by coming up with a more innovative design? Or by offering their clients something unique, perhaps the ability to compare the energy efficiency of several alternatives in real-time. Yes, the drawing has to happen — but that doesn’t mean we can’t have more fun along the way.
While I was in Budapest, I also got to meet with Graphisoft CEO Huw Roberts and Nemetschek's Cesar Rodriguez; that conversation will be the topic of a future blog post. Suffice to say, for now, that Nemetschek really values its Graphisoft brand and sees it as integral to its digital twin vision. More on that soon.
Note: Graphisoft graciously covered some of the expenses associated with my participation in the event but did not in any way influence the content of this post. The cover picture is of (left to right) Ron Close, Márton Kiss and Huw Roberts during their media/analyst presentation, taken by me; I grabbed the uncredited photos from Graphisoft's web stream of the event.