The GPT Store: Hype vs. Reality

The GPT Store: Hype vs. Reality

Promising Yet Problematic: The GPT Store's Rocky Launch Highlights Potential and Pitfalls in Developer Experience and Functionality

The long-awaited GPT Store is here! Unfortunately, the platform falls flat in terms of functionality and developer experience.

While the GPT store could one day be a marketplace as big as Apple’s App Store, it wasn’t the most transformative feature OpenAI released last week. Let’s dive in.

Functionality Fiasco → After OpenAI’s Demo Day in November, the entire tech industry was geared up for a diverse range of GPTs, ready to revolutionize workflows and bring customization to the company’s flagship product – ChatGPT.?

To recap: first, they released CustomGPTs.?

An interactive tool that allows users to develop and deploy their own versions of ChatGPT – all within a no-code editor. CustomGPTs have the ability to write + execute code, generate images, execute API calls and read files.?

After the OpenAI leadership debacle in December, we now have the GPT Store.?

After a week of the GPTStore being out, the overall impression is that the functionality of the store is a major WIP.

  • Each GPTStore category only has 12 CustomGPTs highlighted. There’s no space to leave reviews, engage with developers, or give them feedback.

  • No basic QA/QC process for what gets allowed on the GPTStore. Numerous GPTs with the same name. No way to properly vet GPT developers. And most concerning is the growing awareness that the authentication workflow presents significant risk of scam and fraud. In this workflow, users are taken away from the OpenAI website and are asked to give permissions to third-party applications – all without appropriate vetting of how and which apps can ask for this permission.
  • 25% of the DALLE section is logo generators, and the “Featured” section at the top of the store hasn’t changed once since its release. This signals a pretty distinct lack of curation and attention to detail when it comes to content development.

Dev Experience Downer → One of the major downsides of the first version of the GPTStore has been the developer experience, and the fact that it's not really a store.

As Christ Guest, CEO of Traction Design, stated in his article: “In fact from a commerce perspective one could argue that a “store” isn’t really the right metaphor at all. With only a select number of makers being rewarded for their popularity, this is more like Spotify than the iTunes Store, let alone App Store.”

Now, the perspective here is that developers are paramount to the success of these CustomGPTs.?

Just as social media platforms provide pathways for creators to monetize their content, developers will need a pathway beyond engagement-based compensation for their work building CustomGPTs with OpenAI. If OpenAI continues to only allow engagement based compensation, the quality of what's in the store will stagnate and, eventually, deteriorate.?

ChatGPT for Teams > GPT Store → While the GPT Store was definitely the most popular update, ChatGPT for Teams is currently the most practical and useful update for those looking to test, and eventually adopt, ChatGPT.?

Previously, ChatGPT had a one-size-fits-all subscription model: $20/month for limited access to GPT 4, along with access to the Plug In Store (now the GPT Store) and unlimited access to GPT 3.5. Those who wanted to use ChatGPT – but needed 100% confidence that their chats weren't going to be used to retrain GPT in the future – had to either fill out a form and hope their request would get approved, or inquire about an Enterprise plan.

After last week’s update, ChatGPT for Teams introduces a new model for smaller organizations to take advantage of ChatGPTs power, providing greater flexibility and an easy to use admin dashboard to manage users & billing. The big difference between getting a normal ChatGPT account and ChatGPT for Teams is that those on a Teams account don’t have to worry about their data making it into OpenAI’s training datasets.?

This guarantee opens the potential for wholesale adoption of ChatGPT by all types of enterprises including local governments, non-profits, agencies, and small businesses.?

This big, albeit singular, feature has resulted in a 20% price increase to $25, $5 over the normal ChatGPT+ price point.?


Unfortunately, this price point may reflect the true cost of the ChatGPT services, with many outlets reporting that the users on the $20 ChatGPT+ price point may get grandfathered in later this year as GPT 4.5 or 5 rolls out.

Our Biggest takeaway: Bullish on GPT store, but still a WIP

Every week, the MJ Ventures team plans to have a Dark-Horse Hot Take, where our entire founding team takes a stance on a particular Hot Take. This week’s Hot Take is whether GPT 5 will make most of the Custom GPTs in the GPT Store irrelevant. Here’s what our team thinks:

Thanks for reading The Digital Polity! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Click to Subscribe




Good article! I have to admit, the developer experience has its moments. Setting up connections, authentication, and working with your custom API schema turned out to be surprisingly straightforward. However, I did run into some issues when it comes to controlling how API responses and data are rendered or structured when presented to the user. It feels like there’s room for improvement in terms of consistency. Plus, there are some bugs with custom actions.

Amar Harolikar

Specialist: Decision Sciences & Generative AI Applications

8 个月

Absolutely spot on. Glad to see the issue highlighted. ? Currently, the GPT store resembles more a prompt collection than something akin to the App Store or Play Store. Ole Lehmann (The AI Solopreneur) remarks, "99% of user-generated GPTs on the ChatGPT Store suck," hit the nail on the head. He also pinpoints some standout ones in the mix. ? There's a significant oversight, though: I've been developing GPTs and customized bots using JavaScript and third-party platforms, conducting hack-tests on GPTs and bots. It's startlingly easy. Basic prompts led my GPTs and bots to divulge instructions and file contents. Attempts to curb this by adding one or two warning lines proved futile. I suspect over 90% of GPTs are vulnerable. Amidst the current buzz, this has become a peculiar blind spot. I've shared my learnings detailing these vulnerabilities, hacks, and countermeasures: "Code Red: Unprotected GPTs & AI Apps exposed by simple hacks." https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/code-red-unprotected-gpts-ai-apps-exposed-simple-hacks-amar-harolikar-5ibuc%3FtrackingId=9UShWJqkGJmUw9S03qHzqg%253D%253D/?trackingId=9UShWJqkGJmUw9S03qHzqg%3D%3D ? It's just beginning, so there's room for growth and transformation.

  • 该图片无替代文字
Robert Hiett

Executive | CAIO | AI Expert | Author

8 个月

I think that all of you AI experts are living in a little bit of a different world than the rest of us. You're expecting a brain surgeon level product when the rest of us just need a doctor. You have to give the GPT store and its creator's time to actually learn to create these things, and then those same creators need to learn to update and modify their GPTs over time. For the people who don't live in AI everyday critical functions supplied by ChatGPT, Claude AI, and other projects significantly speed up our work. In addition, they can provide a different perspective for us to consider given the broad knowledge base that these GPTs tend to bring to the table. Not only that, but additional abilities such as image generation, image analysis, document analysis, video creation, etc also provide many small to medium size entities with a cost-effective way to develop content or perform functions that otherwise would have cost thousands of dollars in external consulting fees. So before you and the other rocket scientists of AI go bashing the store and saying it's the worst thing in the world perhaps you need to climb out of your bubble and think about how transformative GPT and AI is for the rest of us. Micah Gaudet

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了