GPT is Here. What's a Teacher to Do?

GPT is Here. What's a Teacher to Do?

Teachers and professors (I used to be one) are facing a new "threat" in that large language models like GPT-3, chatGPT, and others can easily complete most student writing assignments in a second and for pennies (or free, depending on which system they use). It should remind us of the advent of the Internet, which worried teachers that students could complete assignments by using information available from any computer with a simple copy/paste. Plagiarism checkers arose, enabling teachers to check assignments for wholesale lifting of text from sources, which of course drove students to try to modify copied text enough to skirt the checkers. Now checkers are becoming available that claim to be able to detect AI-generated text.

A colleague asked GPT to do his son's assignment (as an experiment--they weren't going to turn it in) and it did, but it failed a plagiarism checker. Then they asked the AI to redo the assignment in a way that does not plagiarize, and produced a version that passed the checker. But is an arms race between large language models and systems that can detect their usage the answer? Banning AI usage would be like trying to prohibit the use of Wikipedia in school work, or banning the asking of questions of anyone with a PhD in the field, or of posting questions online and collecting answers. The technology will always win. Fundamentally, we must train students to think, and to express their ideas, standing on the intellectual shoulders of those who have gone before. Perhaps thanks to AI, this kind of analysis and synthesis work was the exclusive domain of graduate students, but is now accessible to high schoolers.

Could we take the position that students have such powerful tools so they can do more advanced work, rather than so they can more easily avoid (more basic) work? To continue investigation along these lines, I put it to GPT-3, asking it to, "write a high school student history assignment that cannot be easily answered by use of GPT-3." It came up with some good ideas, which I list below, but more importantly it serves to inspire teachers and professors to challenge students to new levels of analytical and creative thought--the primary goal of education anyway. If, with the use of advanced AI tools, a high schooler can do college-level work, then the rising tide of capability can raise all of the student ships. In the same way that teachers might now avoid assigning plain long division problems, since online calculators can not only provide the answer, but also show all the intermediate steps, teachers must no longer assign simple "search and report" assignments. "Write a paper on elephants," is easily solved by a quick look at Wikipedia, while "compare and contrast elephants and tigers," is easily handled by GPT-3. But how about, "write an essay about the best methods for preserving wild species with arguments for species prioritization." When fed to GPT-3 as a prompt, the result is a fairly thin essay that mostly recirculates the terms in the prompt--I tend to think the result would not get a very good grade, since the assignment calls for more creative and analytical thinking--something large language models cannot do. After all, the large language model is limited by the writings of human beings at a point in time, so further human thought and creativity will always be possible. The new challenge for teachers is to create assignments that foster these abilities in students.

EXHIBIT 1

GPT-3's answer to, "write a high school student history assignment that cannot be easily answered by use of GPT-3"

1. Research and write a paper on the origins and impact of the "School to Prison Pipeline" in the United States.

2. Explore the different historical events and laws that led to the development and implementation of the "War on Drugs" in the United States and its subsequent effect on incarceration rates.

3. Using primary sources, analyze the effects of the Jim Crow Laws on African American communities in the United States throughout the 20th century.

4. Investigate the history and impact of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 on Native American communities in the United States.

5. Analyze how the desegregation of public schools in the United States has impacted educational outcomes for students of color.

6. Research the history of the labor movement in the United States and explore the impact of unions on working conditions for laborers.

7. Examine the history of civil rights movements in the United States and the impact they have had on civil rights legislation.

8. Investigate the history of the women's suffrage movement in the United States and analyze the impact of their efforts on women's rights and representation.

Elizabeth Hill

Follow your strengths

1 年

One of the best ways to combat cheating is the flipped classroom. Make the assignments “reading the text” or taking notes on the primary sources of material for the research essay. Engage the class to tackle the harder problem solving, writing, etc while in your classroom. In this way they have the benefit of you the “expert” their teacher to complete assignments & you’ve an eye to how they are progressing with the material. Moving from the sage on the stage to a student’s guide on the side has the added benefit of being closer to a future workplace dynamic they are likely to encounter.

回复
Paul Heininger

Looking for opportunities to increase my skills in cybersecurity.

1 年

Over time technology changes our learning and teaching goals: - Typing became keyboarding which is now required of all students in my area. - Schools in my area spend limited or no time teaching American cursive writing. - Memorizing spelling is less important when the word processing software will check your spelling. (But make sure you use the correct homonym.) - Memorizing grammar rules is less important when you have a word processor with a grammar checker. - Getting the essay right in the first two tries is less?important when you have easy editing. - Memorizing addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division tables has less importance when everyone may use a calculator. The same is true for long division. - Learning to use a slide rule was an important goal of my high school physics class. Not needed when everyone may use a calculator. (Yes, I was in high school before 1973 when HP released the first handheld calculator.)

回复
Ricardo Reis

Systems Engineering Igniter

1 年

Some are already taking the lead. Interesting point in the article with what is already happening: students that contract humans in Africa to write their essays for them… teachers need to up the game. https://www.npr.org/2023/01/26/1151499213/chatgpt-ai-education-cheating-classroom-wharton-school?mc_cid=b620e44e82&mc_eid=4b42a262f4

回复
Daniel Toczala

IBM Watson, Data, and AI Expert - Technical and Business Leader

1 年

Educators recognize disruption in every other industry - but not their own. I remember when the electronic calculator was going to ruin math classes. Now students just accelerate to learning Calculus in high school. The rest of the education system is going to have to change to keep up with the advances. You have a current learning model based on training factory workers - you need to change the model to train knowledge workers. It will take some creative/critical thinking (notice a trend here in all of the comments) and some trial and error..... ??

回复
Michael Woudenberg

Systems Integrator | Technologist | Author | Educator

1 年

These generative AIs are a great tool for brainstorming. But what is missing, so far, is creativity. https://polymathicbeing.substack.com/p/can-ai-be-creative

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Barclay R. Brown, Ph.D., ESEP的更多文章

  • Fact-Checking Headlines about ChatGPT and Coding

    Fact-Checking Headlines about ChatGPT and Coding

    A post by futurism.com features the headline, "STUDY FINDS THAT 52 PERCENT OF CHATGPT ANSWERS TO PROGRAMMING QUESTIONS…

    16 条评论
  • Robot Imagination Surpasses Human

    Robot Imagination Surpasses Human

    By now you've heard of the alleged AI system that decided to kill its operator, judging that the operator was a…

    13 条评论
  • Why AIs Won't Be Taking Over Anytime Soon

    Why AIs Won't Be Taking Over Anytime Soon

    Imagine we want to build an AI-based robot that can play baseball as well as a good human player. We start by…

    8 条评论
  • AI Generates Design Concepts for Inspiration

    AI Generates Design Concepts for Inspiration

    A recent post on LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.

    2 条评论
  • Why AIs Won't Be Taking Over Anytime Soon

    Why AIs Won't Be Taking Over Anytime Soon

    Imagine we want to build an AI-based robot that can play baseball as well as a good human player. We start by…

    1 条评论
  • People Systems: Companies Don't Hire People--People Hire People

    People Systems: Companies Don't Hire People--People Hire People

    Taking the systems approach to human activity can bring new insight and understanding. The more common way of analyzing…

    3 条评论
  • Fooled by the System

    Fooled by the System

    Understanding systems also involves avoiding being fooled. I have an illustration of this I’ve presented to seminars…

    10 条评论
  • We Live in a World of Systems

    We Live in a World of Systems

    When I taught a graduate course in systems thinking at Worcester Polytechnic, I told my students that by the end of the…

    10 条评论
  • Why Model?

    Why Model?

    A model of a system is an abstraction that represents aspects of the system in a way that can be analyzed, but which is…

    8 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了