GPT & The End Of The Middle Class
Sanjeev Khadilkar
Program Management for Software Product Engineering - Intelligent, Web Scale, Distributed, Mobile, Real Time, Embedded
After the previous article (ChatGPT for Non-IT Researchers), there were several requests for a landscape overview?of the GPT phenomenon addressing two key aspects:
In this article, we address these questions in reverse order, first the big picture, then the actionable takeaways.
Work to make it happen, watch while it happens, or wonder what happened!
In this, the century of future shock, forward-thinking organizations must always be alert for new technologies that might revolutionize or disrupt their environment or operational model. AI is changing the world as we know it, and if you don't keep up, you'll be shocked when you look around to a world that has passed you by!
Will GPT make the already troubling income and wealth inequality even worse? Or could it help? Though it will provide a boost to productivity, will the benefits accrue only to a few tech millionaires or also to the middle and lower class? Who will control the future of this amazing technology? New large language models will transform many jobs. Will it lead to widespread prosperity or spell the end of the middle class?
App developers, venture-backed startups, and some of the world’s largest corporations are all scrambling to make sense of the sensational text-generating bot released by OpenAI in November 2022. You can practically hear the shrieks from corner offices around the world: “What is our ChatGPT play? How do we make money off this?”
How GPT is about to revolutionize the economy
AI tools help the least skilled and least accomplished workers the most, decreasing the performance gap between employees. In other words, the poor performers get much better; while the good performers simply get a little faster.
GPT and other generative AIs could, in the jargon of economists, “upskill” people who are having trouble finding work. Workers displaced from office and manufacturing in one domain might be able to leverage generative AI as a practical tool to broaden their expertise and acquire the specialized skills required in other areas, such as health care or teaching, where there are plenty of jobs, revitalizing the workforce.
Less-skilled workers will increasingly be able to take on what is now thought of as knowledge work, and at the same time, the most talented knowledge workers will radically scale up their existing advantages over everyone else. This effectively will eliminate the “middle class” in knowledge work.
Automating creative and reasoning tasks previously thought to be solely in the realm of human ability will take robotic process automation to the next level, eliminating some white collar jobs of a less-creative nature. Automating relatively routine workflows will depress job prospects for clerical office workers.
Companies will use AI to destroy what once looked like well-paying automation-proof jobs, and lay off millions of “routinely creative” white collar workers. Those laid off will be forced to shift to lower-paying service employment.
Having more education and expertise no longer will serve as a moat for job security unless the contributions required by the job are of a particularly creative nature. Ten years from now, AI will start eliminating those jobs which are well-paid but non-creative.
Remuneration for performing boring office tasks / routine white-collar drudgery will drop sharply, putting at risk the very existence of such employment opportunities.
However, labor market supply and demand will depress clerical?salaries sufficiently for human labor to remain a competitive alternative to AI-powered robotic process automation. With massive layoffs reconciling people to a universal salary reset, the water eventually will find its own level and a new normal will emerge and stabilize.
There will be significant impact causing structural dislocation in developed and wealthy countries. Poor and less developed countries still exist largely in the world of a century ago, so, ironically enough, they will experience a much smoother transition to the new normal.
Impact on the labor market
Roles heavily reliant on subject matter expertise and critical thinking skills like pharmacists, lawyers and astronomers are an exception, as they have a negative correlation with LLM exposure, and hence may see less impact of an adverse nature.
On the other hand, routine programming and writing skills are positively associated with LLM exposure. Future tools based in part on GPT will write essays and marketing pitches, program boilerplate portions of computer code, and extract insights from financial reports.
ChatGPT based tools might reduce by half the amount of time needed to complete various tasks of these professions, though not fully automate jobs to be done, resulting in merging of roles and reduction in staffing.?
Highly creative / skilled jobs will remain safe.
Some affected professions could see great disruption:
Some professions will undergo role revision / consolidation due to partial elimination of tasks / jobs to be done:
Whose jobs are relatively safe for now?
Low-paid manual laborers are less likely to be adversely impacted to a significant extent:
Unstructured real-world hands-on jobs will remain safe.
Job counts in human-to-human in-person services providing affection / care, amusement / entertainment, bliss / delight, enjoyment / pleasure, happiness / satisfaction, excitement / thrill, luxury / style, confidence / trust, peace / safety, etc. will begin expanding slowly until over a few decades they take pole position and start to dominate the economy for the masses.
Universal Basic Income will not materialize but such human-to-human in-person services will evolve to play the same role, with wealthy people maintaining a retinue of personal-service providers whether employees or freelancers.
Tech-savvy companies could quickly become so much more productive that they dominate their workplaces and their sectors, leading to corporate consolidations and the emergence of monopolies. The large computational costs required to build and to run LLM software create a barrier to entry for anyone looking to compete.
Labor unions depend for their bargaining power on the fact that their jobs are essential for the organizations in which they serve. AI is headed inexorably on an inevitable path of destroying such jobs deemed “essential”, neutralizing the negotiating power of unions, and forcing workers into service economy jobs that constitute discretionary consumption from the employer’s perspective.
Thus, while overall productivity and gross national product will increase, so will income inequality and political polarization, continuously squeezing the middle class of society, promoting a minority to the upper class and demoting the majority to the lower class, until a bimodally distributed population with practically no middle class is left.
Impact on public policy
Stagnant wages and worsening income & wealth inequality already has driven political realignment of the blue collar demographic and the emergence of populist protectionist leaders. Now GPT and its ilk promises to?expand the vote-bank of protectionist populism.
Publicly funded national and intergovernmental research, equipped with the huge computing power needed to run the models and the scientific expertise to further develop the technology, could build non-private AI models available as AI superhighways for democratizing access and bring diversity to innovation priorities.
Well-funded bad actors could build DarkAI to breach security & privacy. Unlike Responsible AI, DarkAI additionally could be trained on dark web data, and omit ethical curation filtering pipelines. This will have global security and law & order implications.
The Microsoft-OpenAI alliance will force Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta and other large western world players to bring their own GPT++ offerings to market. Chinese companies will go head to head with the West, leveraging regulatory protections as a competitive advantage.
Vertical integration by strategic alliances will create multinational oligopolistic cartels led by platform companies that control supply and prices across plug-in ancillaries and client industries worldwide.
Governments will respond by enacting compliance laws citing national security, economic sovereignty, restrictive trade practices, labor rights and consumer protection.
领英推荐
Competitive dynamics of the GPT marketplace
OpenAI GPT’s commercial strategy is structured around offering gated API access to selected partners (while withholding access to the underlying GPT model and its trained weights), accelerating go-to-market of startups building business applications.
API access is a much friendlier paradigm for small teams and product-driven startups than building their own LLMs. It turns AI from an annotation / training problem into a meta-coding problem with English as a programming language (prompt engineering).
Small players and new market entrants can create MVPs without investing in much training data or infrastructure. Building AI-powered product features becomes as simple as asking GPT to answer the right questions.
Instead of fine-tuning models with huge training data, one designs and fine-tunes questions in natural language. The approach yields useful results for a large-enough range of problems to trigger a gold rush of ventures over the coming decade.
There will be an explosion of startups building MVPs on OpenAI’s GPT API. MVPs that deliver acceptable performance will start flooding the market. Current market leaders (like Grammarly in the NLP area) will face low-cost competitors.
API-dependent startups may lack domain expertise and marketing muscle to scale beyond the MVP, eventually driving market consolidation. But the cut-throat pricing war for market share will drive non-AI providers into the ground.
Business implications of the GPT revolution: What should companies do?
Generative AI products have vast potential for practical applications in business. Their impact will span every industry including law, finance, marketing, retail, energy, construction, fashion, entertainment, manufacturing and distribution.
Designing innovative new products and creating innovative solutions that meet the specific needs of customers will make GPT a game-changer. In conjunction with complementary products, it can be used to create entirely new content beyond just language and multimedia, such as software code, 3D models and intelligent voice assistants.
GPT can be applied to a wide range of business cases, such as marketing communications, software development, employee training and research. By automating tasks and optimizing business processes through AI-powered digital transformation, GPT will help re-imagine the way different aspects of the businesses operate in multiple contexts.
The nature of daily work will change, as AI-powered “copilots” get embedded and tightly integrated into workplace systems and become standard operating procedures. “AI Certified” will become a recruitment & promotion criterion.
MaaS (Model as a Service) may prove to be a viable business option, because it positions extremely large task-agnostic models as OpEx instead of CapEx. Client industries have no option but to adopt AI to survive the profitability race. Defensive plays like the so-called ChatGPT Detectors are doomed to fail. Using AI to detect AI only makes AI even smarter in the next iteration. An arms race of adversarial discriminators just provides labelled data for fine tuning.
Scoping the gold rush
Learning best practices and practical experience will provide a clear understanding of how this technology can be leveraged to drive business growth and innovation along hitherto inconceivable lines, like (say) automatic generation of business plans and customized software. However, the core remains sound business common sense.
Fitness for purpose: Like every other technology, GPT is one of many tools in the product toolbox. We need to move past scientific achievements and think for what type of applications LLMs such as GPT are best suited.
Though GPT LLMs can perform many tasks, they’re not necessarily the ideal solution or even the best tools for those tasks. How do you decide where to use LLMs versus an alternate solution? Considerations include:
Trustworthiness: One guiding principle to determine whether LLMs are fit for an application is whether their mechanism is coherent with the structure of the task. Even if LLMs solve or successfully perform on some examples of the task, it does not mean that they are reliable in that field more generally.
Next-token prediction is an excellent solution for some tasks, such as text generation. However, LLMs are known to hallucinate, making up things that are not correct, so cannot be trusted as sources of knowledge, especially in domains like health, legal advice, science or software coding.
Prompt engineering methods require that you know enough about that domain to be able to provide the extra knowledge for vetting. Blindly trusting the language model can result in output which is unusable due to poor quality and / or due to creating business risk.
In practice, only trust GPT when:
Commercial Viability: Consider both conventional business factors and product market fit:
Performance & Adaptability: Every token GPT generates comes at an enormous computing cost. From a product perspective, the application may not need that kind of heavy computation. In many?cases, even if GPT provides a perfect answer, there might be much simpler, faster, and less costly solutions. Consider aspects like:
Governance: This covers a spectrum of factors:
Talent: Even while GPT forebodes job losses, it also renews the eternal war for talent:
Costing: Capex is needed to build, maintain & enhance, Opex is needed to deploy and run LLMs. Retraining an open-source LLM with private data and hosting on cloud is unaffordable for mid-tier companies. LLM APIs hosted by OpenAI and its competitors are too expensive.
Business case definition for GPT Applications
Brainstorm use cases across functions and sub-functions in three categories:
Be open to the potentialities for GPT-powered innovation in all sectors.
There is no sector, whether Ecommerce or Industrial process control or Space or Software & IT, where one cannot find some or the other organizational sub-function in which to use GPT technology for overcoming business, commerce, engineering or scientific challenges. We just need to question our hard-held assumptions about "how things normally are done around here" while retaining pragmatism about scoping and viability.
As an example of how detailing workflows to sub-processes level can expose viable opportunities, consider the use of GPT in educational content creation and presentation. Instead of simply asking GPT to create educational content on a topic, ask what steps a teacher goes through over the educational lifecycle. It will become apparent immediately how many distinct opportunities there are to leverage GPT technology:
"You are terminated" or "I will be back"?
Technological civilization in its current form is moving inexorably towards a decisive moment, a crucial turning point when old things change and new things begin, a perilous situation?when things suddenly might start to go awry, a time when one should be especially wary, quick-witted and resourceful.
Many elements are at play in the dynamic of this situation's unfolding. While it might either turn out for better or for worse,?the latent possibility of a highly undesirable outcome?must remain in mind as we move forward.
Historically, such situations focus individuals as well as organizations sharply on what really matters. Incentives and motivations change, getting the collective adrenaline flowing,?potentially leading to new cooperative behaviors and even to the creation of new systems or structures.
Provided we have the courage to question and challenge traditional approaches and paradigms, the circumstances?act as a forcing function, leading to?emergence of new talent, rapid problem solving, cooperation among former rivals, dramatic policy shifts, sustainable systemic change, and increased resiliency for the next event.
Which way do you swing on this?