Government Evaluators Do Not Even Know What Win Themes Are
Peter Lierni, CAP.APMP and CP.APMP (Author)
I enable GovCon capture teams to better work together to win competitive pursuits. Click the link below, “Why Your Company?” to learn more.
A Common Understanding of Win Themes
Win Themes are higher level (meta themes) features and benefits that help customers understand why your offer is best. They should drive your company’s offering. Win Themes and supporting discriminators are the MOST EFFECTIVE way to distinguish your company’s proposal from the competition’s (other than price).
With government contracting (GovCon) competitive procurements, win themes need to be tied to customer benefits that are recognizable by evaluators, as well as tied to decision criteria. Win Themes need to be consistent with your company’s win strategy. For example, if your win strategy is to offer lowest price, then your win themes should be about meeting customer requirements at lowest price and not be about innovation or a technically superior product). In addition, your company should try to socialize its win themes with the target customer besides being a part of the written proposal.
The Problem
If you can introduce me to an evaluator of a competitive GovCon procurement who knows anything about win themes, I would like to buy you lunch.? My e-mail is [email protected], and I am in the National Capital Area. You will never hear during a debrief for a competitive GovCon procurement, “Your company had great win themes.” Please do not think though that I am anti-win theme.
The concern is that too often, GovCon companies approach win themes in a manner that is half-ass.? What counts most with win themes is how did you derive them, and are you able to substantiate them? ?Their proof needs to transcend the entire proposal.? They must be developed early (i.e., not something developed right before proposal writing or even worse, added after the proposal is written). They need to be formulated in a manner that is traceable, defensible, and explainable, and as aforementioned, validated with the target customer.
The Need
There is a need today for GovCons to be able to better formulate win themes in a way that traceable, defensible, and explainable for their competitive pursuits. Key to this is having a capability that enables the company to better perform the upfront thinking and analyses necessary to win a competitive GovCon pursuit, as well as give the C-Suite the transparency and accountability that it requires.
You can call it a Cloud-based strategic analysis support system (SA2S), which:
―??? Issue & Key Factor Analyses
―??? Notional Winner Benchmark Analysis
―??? Competitive Assessment
―??? Discriminator Qualification
领英推荐
―??? Gap Analysis
―??? Win Strategy Development
―??? Win Theme Formulation
―??? Proposal Strategy Development
―??? Strength Inventory Formulation
The Benefits
In particular, the benefits of such a SA2S capability are that it would:
?Win Themes Need to Be Traceable, Defensible, and Explainable
There is now available to the GovCon marketspace an innovative on-premises or Cloud-based strategic analysis support system or SA2S capability.? The SA2S is called “SET?”, and it is specifically designed to do the necessary “strategic thinking before writing” in the opportunity assessment, capture, and proposal planning phases of competitive pursuits. In particular, SET enables better formulation of traceable, defensible, and explainable win themes for competitive GovCon procurements. As a result, SET enables the winning of more competitive GovCon pursuits and increases the overall enterprise value of GovCon companies by providing the aforementioned benefits and more.
Author: Copyright 08 January 2025, Peter Lierni, Founder, Solutioneering, LLC
Communications, Government Relations , Capture/Proposal Management
1 个月Love this
Still focused on making government more effective, efficient, and responsive
1 个月Insightful
?? Helping Teams & Individuals Increase Their Presentations Skills to the Level of a TOPGUN Instructor | Public Speaker | Author: ★ Tell It Like a TOPGUN ★
1 个月A “must read” for every “must win” proposal. Well done Peter.
President/CEO at FP&C Consulting
1 个月Another well written article, Peter. I think this is the point you’re driving, but if the proposal is written with the customer in mind, they shouldn’t have to know what win themes are. The evaluators should see the value of the proposed approach because of the thinking the offeror put into the approach, to include the appropriate and relevant win theme(s). For us, we are responding to fewer proposals, but responding “better” on every one. This approach helps with the bandwidth issue and allows us to really dig in and understand what’s keeping the customer up at night. For us, SET allows us to capture this information in a systematic and meaningful way. I always appreciate your thought provoking approach to GovCon, thanks for what you do!!