The GOP blamed the L.A. fires on California’s ‘forest management.’ But that’s not the problem
Welcome to?Fast?Company?Daily, our?daily?newsletter on?LinkedIn, featuring a free article selected each?day?by our editors as well as a roundup of great advice on careers, hiring, innovation, and technology.
Visit?fastcompany.com?for our top stories and breaking news.?First time seeing this? Please?subscribe.
We talk about redesigns and rebrands (and refreshes) a lot—but it’s easy to forget that it’s a bit of a small miracle that any of them made it across the finish line in the first place.
Briefs. Pitches. Indecisive clients. Money (or lack thereof). And, of course, the “design by committee” factor that can permeate such projects.
As we went a new year, Fast Company's design team wondered: What would some of today’s creative leaders choose to redesign if they didn’t have to deal with any of that? What would they choose to redesign, blue-sky style, if budget, time and practicality were no consideration?
A?Fast?Company?Premium?subscription offers readers full access to subscriber-only stories including exclusive reporting and trend analysis on technology, business innovation, future of work, and design.
Get the details and subscribe here.
The GOP blamed the L.A. fires on California’s ‘forest management.’ But that’s not the problem
By Adele Peters
When the Palisades Fire started near a hiking trail in Los Angeles on January 7—quickly spreading to more than 200 acres in 20 minutes, and nearly 3,000 acres by the end of the day—some critics argued that land management was to blame.
领英推荐
Rick Caruso, a billionaire real estate developer who lost the L.A. mayoral race in 2022, claimed that a root cause of the fires was failing to remove brush from the hills. Elon Musk blamed “crazy environmental regulations” that he said prevented creating firebreaks and clearing brush. Donald Trump—who had said in the past that California needed to “rake” its forests—complained again about the state’s forest management. And when Congress reintroduced a “Fix Our Forests” bill this week that would make it easier for the logging industry to cut down trees, some politicians implied that the fires in L.A. could have been prevented if it had been in place; on Thursday, that bill passed in the House.
The problem: The landscape around Los Angeles isn’t a forest, and clearing out the native plants could make fires even worse.
“It drives me crazy when you hear people talk about how we need to manage the forests around L.A.,” says Richard Halsey, director of the nonprofit California Chaparral Institute and the author of Fire, Chaparral, and Survival in Southern California. “There aren’t any.”
Unlike mountains in parts of Northern California that are filled with pine and cedar trees, the hills around L.A. are covered in chaparral, an ecosystem made up of small drought-tolerant shrubs like manzanita. In some Northern California forests, “prescribed burns” can help prevent extreme fires by clearing out undergrowth on the forest floor. (Decades of fire suppression in these forests have helped make fires bigger and more destructive.)
But chaparral doesn’t naturally burn as often, and deliberately burning it can kill it off. “The result of that is you lose all the native shrubs and they are eventually replaced by more flammable, non-native grasses which then present a greater fire risk on the landscape than the chaparral ever does,” Halsey says.
Grass fires can be incredibly destructive. When the Marshall Fire burned in Colorado in 2021, destroying hundreds of buildings, killing two people, and forcing tens of thousands of residents to evacuate, it spread through grass, not trees or shrubs. In Texas last year, the record-breaking Smokehouse Creek Fire burned through more than a million acres of ranchland, not forests. Strong winds and hot weather made the fire spread quickly.
In Southern California, the extreme weather conditions, with hurricane-force winds, meant that the fires almost certainly would have spread even if there were large fire breaks in place with no vegetation. “You could have put a 10-lane freeway in front of that fire and it would not have slowed it down one bit,” Brian Fennessy, the fire chief in Orange County, told the Los Angeles Times.
The L.A. fires spread as embers flew miles through the air, not just through vegetation on the ground. And as houses ignited, they became the main fuel, not trees or shrubs.
If clearing vegetation in wild areas isn’t helpful, Halsey argues that cities should be focused on making homes more resilient to fires. That includes creating “defensible space” around a house, adding features like fire-resistant windows and decks, and making sure that sparks can’t enter a house through vents. Halsey also advocates for exterior sprinklers for buildings that are more commonly used in places like Australia and Canada. (In a fire in Minnesota in 2007, nearly 200 houses that had sprinkler systems survived, while neighboring houses burned.)
“We keep going to vegetation, and we’ve been doing this for 100 years,” he says. “We keep losing more people and more homes. You’d think somebody in the room would say, ‘You know, maybe we should be doing something differently.’”
OK Bo?tjan Dolin?ek
Chief Marketing Officer at PriceWeber
1 个月I appreciate the additional perspective FastCo. I did not realize how different the North California and South California "forests" were.
We Provide Premier Wealth And Tax Planning Services For Successful Business Owners, Executives, And Owners Of Highly-Appreciated Assets Across The U.S.
1 个月Laughably stupid shit
Retired from Vanguard April 2020
1 个月Adele, now that you wrote your woke anti-GOP hit piece, how about if you provide a more balanced perspective by criticizing the Democrat leadership at the state and city level?
principal, erin clark design
1 个月I don't think asking people who made terrible policies if their terrible policies are terrible is all that useful.