Good vs Bad Testing? How to differentiate and its impacts?

Businesses work hard to eliminate bugs and avoid faults in their software since these issues tend to turn away customers and render their products vulnerable to hostile assaults.?

Most product failures can be traced back to poor quality assurance. However, a robust test plan will help prevent confusion and issues with your team throughout the project's life cycle by clarifying what the business wants to achieve regarding quality.

Consequently, the following list of bad and excellent testing practices should be considered.

Bad Practices:

1. Concentrating only on one type of testing: Companies frequently make the mistake of selecting only one type of testing and sticking with it for the project's duration. Also, people often want to automate everything when they learn about the power of automation in testing. Automated tests are excellent at accelerating repetitive tasks and regression testing, but they're terrible for spotting errors that weren't previously apparent. It is to explain that no one type of testing can thoroughly evaluate your product.?
2. Suppose the test is only to conduct one specific test condition. The various user situations the website or application is anticipated to support must be considered while creating each test case. This entails testing the software module under all potential circumstances. Presenting them so that other QAs can review them is now necessary for thorough testing of these combinations.
3. The test that includes just a single, minor functionality: Building test cases that are narrowly focused on a single function is ineffective. They must instead confirm usage patterns and routines. Each test case should be designed to cover as much workflow as possible without functioning outside the software's technological limitations.

Good Practices:

1. Considering yourself the customer: Customers frequently phone customer service to voice their dissatisfaction when an application feature falls short of expectations. Any good tester can connect with clients, foresee their needs, and develop test cases accordingly. Test cases should be able to simulate consumer use of the tested functionality. Keep the clients' requirements front and centre when writing practical test cases. This is particularly valid when doing accessibility and usability testing.
2. Diagnostic worth: A test that identifies the root cause of a fault is more beneficial than one that only tells that "something went wrong." And about consistency - A test that produces consistent findings is more valuable than one that does not.
3. A good test plan covers all tests: Writing compelling test cases is about giving as much test coverage as possible. Each test case should attempt to cover the most significant number of features, user scenarios, and workflow components. The SRS (software requirements specification) document's components, features, and functions should all be covered by test cases.

The final aspect of a good test is that it should make you learn more about the stuff you're testing, inspire you to think of new ideas and risks and provide the team with critical information (both good and bad).

If you discover that the information you've learned from your testing isn't helpful, there could be a variety of causes:?

1. The test itself was inadequate or improperly conducted. You might need to re-run it or re-evaluate it.
2. To some extent, you are repeating yourself while learning nothing new about your test subject.
3. Simply put, you've run out of options. This could result from getting tired or running out of test preparation ideas.

High-quality items do not happen by accident. Such products result from a coordinated effort to establish an excellent culture, and QAonCloud can assist you in doing so with our adaptable engagement models and dedicated QA team.