Good people fake news as well

Good people fake news as well

Just recently, a host of good people with good intentions believed, propagated and even made-up, news. Their determination to believe that standard vaping caused the hospitalisations of scores of people in the US, prevented the real facts emerging for more than two months.

Vaping was the most obvious common factor among an worrying rash of hospitalisations in the US a few months back of people with a mysterious lung failure. It occurred against the backdrop of establishment activism against a rise in young people vaping, fueled further by President Trump. Media, commentators, and sadly, authorities, jumped onto the issue, warning people to stop vaping immediately.

Unfortunately, such was the force of this establishment peer pressure, the investigating health and police agencies were slow to undermine this "precautionary" advice by trusting in the facts they had to hand, or even trusting in basic logic.

What the authorities would have quietly figured in the first week was classic logic; that countries with similar or higher rates of vaping for at least a couple of years, had never seen this lung illness. Therefore the issue was not about vaping per se, but something related to the geography; like a source of fluid or a trend of usage behavior among users.

They had evidence in the first week that pointed to the local cause; at least a third of the patients admitted to using the devices to vape a cannabis fluid. Given the legal and social status of cannabis, it was possible the other patients had not accurately reported their behaviour.

This first-week calculation is now proven. The authorities have, two months later, felt confident enough against the anti-vaping hysteria to confirm that it wasn't standard vaping at all. All the patients had used street-bought or self-made fluid mixtures that combined cannabis with a vitamin e oil. As it happens, the danger of inhaling vitamin e oil is well known among the vaping sector; researchers, companies and enthusiasts. So it, along with other possible contaminants, are not used.

The establishment's pre-existing anti-vaping attitude prevented accurate and fair discussion of the issue. The truth had to wait until it was incontrovertible, and the emotional aspects of the panic had subsided.

A complicating factor was the tendency for people to believe "victims" in stories. Positing the cannabis hypotheses required infering the patients lied - which few people were brave enough to do. But it turned out that the patients had indeed lied. Check here for a fact check of the true story that emerged about every patient.

The establishment's response had the hallmarks of 'mob justice'; it created a "baddie" out of standard vaping some time ago. When the lung issue hit, it was primed to blame vaping, and to present patients as the 'good guys'.

We like good vs bad stories so much that we've now even created a story that 'bad' news, like 'fake news' comes from bad people.

But it doesn't. Most of the danger to truthful communication is posed by the ease with which good people with good intentions willingly suspend their own reasoning faculties.

Great piece Mark Blackham. A classic case of not letting 'the truth get in the way of a good story'. Sadly, in many ways, in today's society, the 'truth' is becoming more and more subjective, with little regard to reality. As the Manic Street Preachers opined, 'You tell me your truth and I'll tell you mine'.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Mark Blackham的更多文章

  • Customers at killing distance

    Customers at killing distance

    The corporate response to the insurance company CEO shot dead last week in the US is likely to be more of the distance…

    6 条评论
  • What happens when you can’t trust anyone?

    What happens when you can’t trust anyone?

    Generation Xers may recall the famous X-Files assertion “Trust no one”. It came to mind with news that official…

  • When to resign in response to controversy

    When to resign in response to controversy

    Executive resignations in response to controversy are generally emotional responses to the personal experience of the…

    3 条评论
  • My Food Bag 'recall': Good enough?

    My Food Bag 'recall': Good enough?

    Saturday night sorting the dishes I mentioned to my wife a radio news item on email warnings from #MyFoodBag about the…

  • Crowdstrike did good crisis comms

    Crowdstrike did good crisis comms

    Crowdstrike's communication management of the global crisis caused by their update was pitch perfect. It was relatively…

  • Facts do change minds

    Facts do change minds

    There's a great book I read before having kids entitled The Scientist in the Crib. It reveals how babies are studying…

  • How to defend yourself in public

    How to defend yourself in public

    The time you really need PR is when you are least popular. But many PR-types won't be there for you.

    1 条评论
  • Lies in surveys

    Lies in surveys

    Survey Bias: A cautionary note for media users I've had 30 years running PR battles using opinion surveys, so I…

    2 条评论
  • The illegal medicines imported by NZers

    The illegal medicines imported by NZers

    New data uncovered by Blackland reveals that New Zealand patients shop internationally when the health system can’t…

    3 条评论
  • How PR helps: the swift reversal

    How PR helps: the swift reversal

    PR really kicks into gear when there's a negative audience reaction. The obvious benefit is speedily dousing the flames…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了