Goldilocks Companies & Usage-Based Pricing
How much of your subscription revenue should be coming from usage-based pricing? Half? None? All of it? Is there even an answer to this question? As it turns out, there is!?
Last year the Subscribed Institute looked at three year’s worth of anonymized performance data from the Zuora platform and found that companies with 1 to 25% of their revenue generated through usage-based pricing showed the best performance across overall revenue growth (25%), average revenue per account growth (13.6%) and churn (26%). In contrast, companies with no usage-based pricing had slightly slower revenue growth (19%), ARPA growth (9.4%), and higher churn rates (33%).?
As a result, we concluded the 1-25% usage-based pricing range was the sweet spot. While every company is different and this shouldn’t be considered a universal rule, the data told us that 1-25%?was the “Goldilocks Zone” -- not too little, and not too much. The broader takeaway, of course, is that if you’re not currently employing some element of usage-based pricing in your subscription business, you should seriously consider it.?
More recently, Nick Cherrier, a Senior Strategist at the Subscribed Strategy Group, decided to run a similar study focusing on performance data from just the past year. Needless to say, it was a crazy year! We had no idea what to expect. While the companies in our Subscription Economy Index still vastly outperformed their S&P 500 counterparts last year, many of them saw drastically reduced consumption, particularly in verticals like travel and retail.?
So would that mean that companies with usage-based pricing would suffer relative to companies with more rigid pricing structures, particularly during difficult economic times? The answer again was no! The Goldilocks companies still came out on top. Yet again, companies that relied on usage-based pricing for between 1 and 25% of their revenue outperformed those that did not, and those that relied too heavily on it.?
Here are a few other highlights from the report:
So, that’s the science. What about the art? After all, subscriptions are more than a financial model, they represent a new way of defining relationships between customers and providers. Today’s customers aren’t simply buying a product, they’re committing to a relationship with a brand. Your usage pricing should reflect that ongoing value.?
领英推荐
The key to effective usage-based pricing is metric selection. Assuming you decide you want to demonstrate a clear correlation between usage value and price, whether through a pure pay-per-use go model or a hybrid model, how do you choose the right metric?
Here are three?core considerations in selecting the right usage metric:
Ultimately, of course, executing usage pricing will always be a process of experimentation. As I discussed with Tom Tunguz, there’s a usage versus tiered pricing sweet spot for every company, and it’s going to change over time. But it’s important to get your feet in the water if you haven’t yet!?There’s lots more to learn in the report, which you can find here.?
*******************
Like what you read? You can sign up for the Subscribed Weekly - delivered to your inbox every Saturday - here: https://www.subscribedweekly.com and visit https://www.subscribed.com/, bringing together the brightest minds and renowned experts to keep you informed, educated and inspired about today's growing #SubscriptionEconomy!
Disclosure: These opinions expressed are mine, not those of the company. The companies mentioned in this newsletter are not necessarily Zuora customers.?
VP of Strategy @ Richemont
3 年Thanks for sharing!
Managing Consultant I Team Lead I Driving Strategy, Business Transformation and Customer Centricity @Siemens
3 年Sandra Lechler Nadine Messmer
Innovator, Futurist, Pioneer, Systems Thinker: Digital Services | Author: Tech Policy Press, FairPay | Nonresident Senior Fellow: Foundation for American Innovation
3 年Great support for usage-based pricing as an approximation of individualized value-based pricing. You say the revenue growth benefit is even greater in B2C but give no details. Since much of the B2C world seems to have the view that consumers hate usage-based pricing and demand flat-rate, all-you-can-eat, it might be very useful if your team could address that in more detail. As a proponent of the idea that value/fairness is worth some sacrifice of simplicity/predictability, I would love to see if you have evidence of that. And if you can convince the B2C world, more decision-makers in B2B would get to experience the merit personally.