GODS GOT YOUR BACK

GODS GOT YOUR BACK

There seems to be a common saying that it is fearfully wrong to ask GOD "why." There are even some who suggest that "why" should be replaced by "what." I would be predisposed to think that depending on the implication of the one asking either term would be detrimental if asked in disbelief.

Let us therefore put this objection to the question. In accordance to word etymology, the term why (adv.) Old English hwi, instrumental case (indicating for what purpose or by what means) of hw?t (see what), from Proto-Germanic adverb *hwi (source also of Old Saxon hwi, Old Norse hvi), from PIE *kwi- (source of Greek pei "where"), locative of *kwo- "who" (see who). As an interjection of surprise or emphasis, recorded from 1510s. As a noun, "cause, reason" from c. 1300.

So in either case whether we permit the usage of why or what, the balance of the sentence yet remains a question of thought, as alluded in the graphic.

The term "why occurs 282 times in 261 verses in the KJV. Comparatively in the NKJV (401). NLT (598), NIV (510), ESV (429), HCSB (477), NASB (389), NET (484), RSV 428), ASV (247), YLT (256), DBY (328), WEB (387), HNV (413).

And yet, even The LORD (κ?ριο? kyrios, koo'-ree-os; from κ?ρο? k?ros (supremacy); supreme in authority, controller; Master) asked The FATHER why?

Matthew 27:46 KJV/ cf Mar 15:34 And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?

Matthew 27:46 John Wycliffe 1388 And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a great voice, and said [saying], Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani, that is, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?

William Tyndale 1500 And about ye nynth houre Iesus cryed with a loude voyce sayinge: Eli Eli lama asbathani. That is to saye my God my God why hast thou forsaken me?

On the hand what (pron.) Old English hw?t, referring to things in abstraction; also "why, wherefore; indeed, surely, truly," from Proto-Germanic pronoun *hwat (source also of Old Saxon hwat, Old Norse hvat, Danish hvad, Old Frisian hwet, Dutch wat, Old High German hwaz, German was, Gothic hva "what"), from PIE *kwod, neuter singular of *kwos "who" (see who). Corresponding to Latin quid.  Meaning "what did you say?" is recorded from c. 1300. As an adjective and adverb, in Old English. As a conjunction in late Old English. Exclamatory use was in Old English. What the _____ (devil, etc.) as an exclamation of surprise is from late 14c. As an interrogative expletive at the end of sentences from 1891; common in affected British speech. Or what as an alternative end to a question is first attested 1766. What have you "anything else one can think of" is from 1925. What's up? "what is happening?" first recorded 1881. . .

In short why suggest purpose, cause; what implies lack of knowledge, understanding or general information. Applying “what” directly here would suggest a request for specific information, as it is an abstract term of indifference. This would then reflect an admission of undue purpose or vagueness (?). Sort of blase, blase. Yet, "why" consents to knowing what; but simply wishing to know the cause, or purpose he is experiencing this at this particular time.

The obvious conclusion here is the usage of “why” suggest purpose, as to say why am I in this place. This may be the result or pursuit of many other variables, and certainly not indifference. Or vagueness to the degree of lack of mission, or effect. So then, is it wrong to ask GOD why? Certainly not. But, it might prove more then contrary to doubt Him for any cause, as this could lead to sin.

Moreover, being the case of so many, who were fully aware of their present situation; needing reassurance of why they had to undergo the experience of which they were encountering (cf. Elijah 1Ki 19:9; Hab 1:2; John Mat 11:2; etc). Sometimes we just need to know that GODS got our back. Especially, when everyone and all else has failed.

John 16:33 These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world. ~Love JESUS

Child of The MOST HIGH, be encouraged to know that in-spite of that which you may currently be experiencing, "GODS GOT YOUR BACK." ~Blessings!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Overseer Betty Williams的更多文章

  • WE ARE FAMILY!!!

    WE ARE FAMILY!!!

    Our boys now men (Derick and Eric) are twins and frankly, inseparable. Yet, they stand as solos with respect to the…

  • ANCHORED IN TRUST

    ANCHORED IN TRUST

    While The Good LORD has placed among us key influences that often lighten our load; let's face it, too often their love…

    1 条评论
  • PARENTAL SOLUTIONS

    PARENTAL SOLUTIONS

    PARENTAL INCENTIVES As a society, each of us have a responsibility to actively serve as a conduit in the fundamental…

  • The Reverend Dr. Dorothy M. Jones, Th.D

    The Reverend Dr. Dorothy M. Jones, Th.D

    The Legacy of The Late Reverend Dr. Dorothy M.

  • THE HUMBLE MAN'S PRAYER

    THE HUMBLE MAN'S PRAYER

    Avoiding positions of grandeur is the humble mans often challenge. So while we have a excellent work to do, things and…

  • HE RESTORES MY SOUL. . .

    HE RESTORES MY SOUL. . .

    Sister Denise and I stopped to aide an elderly woman who we thought needed a helping hand. Upon assisting her in the…

  • Tenets of leadership

    Tenets of leadership

    The veracity of true leadership is contained in unselfish servitude. And this not for popularity, grandeur or gain.

    1 条评论
  • CRUMBS

    CRUMBS

    In retrospect, I have learned to humble myself to receive and not just give. And while the latter is more formidable…

    2 条评论
  • "THE SPIRIT OF JUDAS"

    "THE SPIRIT OF JUDAS"

    Pastors there are those who seemingly agree with you publicly, but in secret align themselves with the forces that are…

  • SPIRITUAL COVERINGS(?)

    SPIRITUAL COVERINGS(?)

    Though the doctrine of "spiritual covering/Shepherding movement (substitute for GOD)" is far from that which is…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了