GM's Bad RTO Optics

GM's Bad RTO Optics

The automotive industry has been uniquely whipsawed by the COVID-19 pandemic.?Factories, dealerships, and offices were shuttered in its earliest days undercutting both supply and demand.

The industry impacts spread outward from these initial shocks with major auto shows folding their tents and ripples of supply chain disruptions roiling normally reliable sourcing arrangements for vital semiconductors.?What slowly dawned on industry participants was the reality that some changes might be longer lasting.

Sure, workers may have returned to the factories, but what would happen with white collar workers??Would supply chains heal??Would traditional auto shows return? Customers returned right away. Demand never slackened.

New answers to these questions are emerging daily.?The first post-pandemic auto show outside of China was the Munich IAA event last fall.?It was different – with suppliers intermingled with car makers on the show floor – and it was reasonably successful.

The L.A. Auto Show that followed later last fall was less successful and signaled that a wider recovery in typical consumer-centric auto shows was not yet in the offing.?Now the Detroit auto show has come and gone with its own reverberations of disappointment.

The bigger question emerging from the lackluster consumer reaction to the Detroit Auto Show (officially the North American International Auto Show) is why car company executives expect consumers to turn out to an auto show if rank and file white collar workers won’t show up at the office.?The headline in the Detroit Free Press told the tale this week: “GM Steps Back on Return-to-Work Policy after Backlash from Salaried Workers.”

GM had put out a call late last week for salaried employees to show up to work physically three days a week.?This modest request was clearly a bridge to far for many.?The home of CEO Mary Barra’s “dress appropriately” mantra was not having any of this “work appropriately” request.

As a post-pandemic frequent traveller I feel a need to express my shock at the situation unfolding at GM.?Plenty of workers across the country and throughout the world have had to return the work – in fact never left work!?I see and interact with these workers every day in my travels.

We don’t think about these workers.?We don’t notice them.?We take them for granted.?They are the workers in hospitality, retail, restaurants, health care, and transportation.

When the automotive industry was on its knees in the spring of 2020, the factory workers – the car makers – they came back.?And they did so with barely a whimper!

The actual car makers helped ensure that the industry’s recovery was swift.?Factory workers returned en masse to automobile plants that had been modified to accommodate pandemic hygiene.?And dealerships, too re-opened to customers who still had a hankering to kick tires and take test drives.

Strangely, the offices of car makers and their suppliers largely remained shuttered.?It became clear this was the case when visitors discovered that in-person meetings were impossible with most headquarter facilities unoccupied.

The revolt of white collar workers at GM is truly revolting.?How do they account for their sentiments as they ride in their Ubers and Lyfts or accept their bag of pretzels from the flight attendant or receive their key to their accommodation??How do they explain THEIR outrage to the Starbucks coffee maker, the mailman, the convenience store clerk?

If you were hired – pre-pandemic – to work in an office, you are obligated now, nearly three years after the onset of the pandemic, to return to that office.?But, seriously, if you work in the automotive industry which is uniquely dependent upon hundreds of thousands of workers building your products, you have a moral obligation to show up physically (with exceptions for those with medical conditions that may render them vulnerable).?If for no other reason, you should show up in the office to demonstrate your solidarity with those folks at the plants. The plant workers took their places on the production for you and me and the industry. What's your contribution?

Dan DeClerck

Multi-patented inventor, Wireless Technology, Software and Systems Architect, ADAS, Automotive.

2 年

If, pre-pandemic, ones job is mostly on conference calls with overseas partners, or your direct management resides on a different continent, this article rings hollow. In software, which, design-wise is eating the automobile, "Flow-time" is important. This is uninterrupted time to design and implement highly complex data and control structures in software. Sitting in an office of cubicles, with the constant prattle of co-workers, phone ringers going off, does not engage deep thinking. Look at those in office. If they are spending most of their time on headphones, should they really be there? Don't get me wrong, I still think face-to-face interaction is important. Just not for the full time you are working. I've managed remote teams for more than a decade. I did a lot of travelling. They were also creative enough to generate over 80 patents, some of it industry essential... So, I disagree with your assessment, because I've done the opposite for more than a decade, and was quite successful.

Roger Excellent points. As a former Automotive Engineer, a significant amount of physical face time is necessary to solve problems and truly collaborate. Same for the component and vehicle validation work, especially when failures occur. Problem solving in front of a screen is not efficient.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了