GLOBAL DOMINATION BLUEPRINT
The American goal of global domination instituted after the Cold War is a foreign policy (political ideology) of “Liberal Hegemony” (LH).
The goals are to promote liberal democracy, embed States in an interdependent economic order, and embed those countries in international institutions.
The benefits are to establish human rights, democratic peace theories, and to make the world safe for democracy.
Instituting this global domination of values includes a wide-spread justification in establishing diversity, equity and inclusion. This is a passport not only to include all peoples of the earth in its crusade, but a license to interfere and sanction every process and person that stands in its way.
The tools for accomplishing LH by utilizing liberal democracy are in, as I read in a recent job description online, “connecting all stakeholders in one common software infrastructure.”
This is partially accomplished through establishing FAANGs, i.e., Meta (formerly known as Facebook), Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Alphabet (formerly known as Google) and more to come, that aggregate segments and enable a system of concise manageable social control and monitoring regulation.
Russia’s recent “police action” in Ukraine instituted a harsh reaction from the West because of a clash in mentalities precisely because Russia cannot be described as a liberal democracy (and thus an enemy) and holds different values. If a State is not a “member of the club” it may be warred upon and/or punished until it sees its way clear to accept and practice the tenants of liberal democracy as the ‘be all and end all.’
领英推荐
The West, namely America and its followers, including NATO, the EU, UK, Canada, Australia and others, sees no other way than to establish itself as the ultimate supreme judge endowed with exceptionalism and military-economic superiority of what is and is not permissible in “making the world safe for democracy,” however that is interpreted.
With the power and control to assure its self-appointed leadership it may side-step any and all measures necessary for the others to obey. What matters is that the end justifies the means. If LH has its way, the ultimate end will be complete boredom.
For more on LH please see John J. Mearsheimer on “Liberal Ideals and International Realities”
?
?