Introduction: The Advent of AI in Software Engineering
The integration of AI into software engineering has marked a significant shift in the way developers approach their work. Tools like GitHub Copilot, an AI-powered coding assistant, have been designed to streamline the coding process by generating code, offering suggestions, and potentially reducing development time. However, while Copilot brings substantial benefits, it’s crucial to recognise that it is not a substitute for the human-centric practice of pair programming. I recently attended a hands-on workshop where I got to try Github Co-Pilot myself and as always, felt it as my responsibility to share my learnings and opinions with all.
What is GitHub Copilot?
GitHub Copilot is an AI-driven tool that assists developers by suggesting code snippets, completing code, and even writing entire functions based on the context provided. It’s powered by OpenAI’s Codex model, which is trained on vast amounts of code from public repositories. Copilot is embedded directly into your code editor, making it easy to use and integrate into your existing workflow. All you need is to install it as a plugin within your IDE (IntelliJ in my case) and activate the license (provided by ThoughtWorks in my case)
Co-Pilot is being branded as "Your AI Pair Programmer" .. but is it really a pair programmer ?? Read on for more insights ..
Effective Prompting
Before we jump on to opinions around Co-Pilot, let us first look at how to effectively use Github Co-Pilot in our day to day development activities. Prompting effectively is the key to unlocking the full potential of GitHub Copilot. In fact, in any conversational AI, the prompting plays a huge role in getting the best outcome. The quality of the suggestions we receive is directly related to the clarity and context we provide.
- Comment-Driven Development: Use detailed, clear comments to guide the AI. For example, instead of a general comment like // handle input, use something more specific such as // sanitise user input to prevent injection attacks. This specificity helps Copilot generate more accurate and relevant code suggestions.
- Descriptive Names: Choose meaningful function and variable names that clearly indicate their purpose. This helps Copilot understand the context better and suggest code that aligns with your intentions.
- Surrounding Context: Copilot works best when it has access to the full context of your code. Ensure that related files are open and that the surrounding code is well-structured. This helps the AI make more informed suggestions.
- Iterate for Improvements: Don’t hesitate to rephrase comments or prompts if the initial suggestions aren’t quite right. Iteration is key to refining the output.
- Regenerate When Needed: If a particular suggestion isn’t up to standard, try deleting the code and prompting Copilot to regenerate it. This in-editor assistance can be particularly useful for exploring different approaches.
When Copilot Works Best
Copilot excels in certain scenarios, such as:
- Popular Frameworks and Languages: More established technologies result in fewer AI hallucinations, as Copilot has been trained extensively on them.
- Straightforward Problems: Copilot shines when dealing with standard or relatively simple tasks, where the path forward is clear. Always remember, its an assistance relying primarily on our expertise. The better we drive it, the better its outcomes will be
- Smaller Coding Chunks: Breaking down tasks into smaller chunks with frequent reviews helps maintain quality and reduces cognitive load.
Advantages and Pitfalls of GitHub Copilot
Advantages:
- Increased Productivity: Copilot can speed up the development process by generating boilerplate code and handling "routine" tasks. Note that the keyword here is "routine" tasks. DO NOT expect to observe increased productivity in case of complex problems which require business context and expertise
- Learning Tool: It can serve as a learning tool, offering suggestions and examples that can help developers learn new frameworks or languages. Use the IDE inbuilt CoPilot CLI prompt to get your code reviewed by ChatGPT
- Error Reduction: By suggesting code that follows best practices, Copilot can help reduce common coding errors.
- Creativity Boost: Copilot can inspire new ways of solving problems by suggesting alternative approaches you might not have considered. However, sometimes it can also backfire due to hallucinations and bad code context.
Pitfalls:
- Dependence on Code Quality: Copilot generates suggestions based on existing code, so poor-quality code will most certainly lead to equally poor suggestions.
- Risk of Stagnation: Over-reliance on Copilot can lead to a lack of critical thinking and creativity, causing developers to become too dependent on AI-generated solutions.
- Inaccurate Suggestions: In complex or less common scenarios, Copilot’s suggestions may be inaccurate or irrelevant.
- Security Concerns: Copilot may generate code that is functional but not secure, potentially leading to vulnerabilities if the suggestions are not carefully reviewed.
GitHub Copilot is "NOT" a Replacement for Pair Programming
While GitHub Copilot is a powerful tool, it does not replace the human element in software development, especially in pair programming. Here are five reasons why:
- Collaboration and Communication: Pair programming fosters real-time communication and collaboration, allowing developers to share knowledge, brainstorm solutions, and ensure that both parties are on the same page. Copilot, while helpful, cannot replicate this dynamic exchange of ideas.
- Collective Code Ownership: In pair programming, both developers take responsibility for the code, ensuring a higher standard of quality and adherence to best practices. Copilot’s suggestions are still generated by AI, and the responsibility for the final code lies with the developer.
- Onboarding and Mentorship: Pair programming is invaluable for onboarding new team members and providing mentorship. Experienced developers can guide newcomers through complex codebases, something Copilot is not designed to do.
- Problem-Solving and Getting Unstuck: When faced with a difficult problem, pair programming allows developers to brainstorm and explore different approaches together. Copilot can suggest solutions, but it doesn’t provide the same level of creative problem-solving as two minds working in tandem.
- Maintaining Focus and Quality: Pair programming helps keep developers focused and ensures that the code meets the team’s quality standards. Copilot can assist, but it requires active oversight to ensure that its suggestions are accurate and appropriate.
- Growing Together: Lastly, one of the prime advantages of pair programming is the constant feedback (constructive as well as positive) that people give to each other helping one another evolve and grow as a programmer and also as a human. Any AI in the near future cannot replace this aspect in my personal opinion
Conclusion
GitHub Copilot represents a significant advancement in AI-driven software development, offering numerous benefits that can enhance productivity and support developers in their work. However, it’s important to understand that Copilot is a tool—a powerful one, but still just a tool. It’s not a replacement for the human-centric practices that lie at the heart of effective software development, particularly pair programming. By leveraging Copilot as an assistant rather than a replacement, developers can achieve a balance that combines the best of AI and human creativity, leading to better, more robust software solutions.
Disclaimer: The banner and the content of this blog post was prepared with the help of AI
Insightful!