Getting it wrong

Getting it wrong

During a recent gemba visit, I realized I had got it wrong, and told the guys I was with straight up. The first time I went to this company they showed me a rework-loop that was implemented because there were defects on every product, or so I thought. What they considered defects were actually minor cosmetic abnormalities that had no bearing on the functionality of the product. For all intents and purposes, they made almost defect-free products. So now what?

We can't argue against striving for perfection, but it also seemed they were doing it because they thought it was what the customer wanted. However, these products are not what you would marvel at in a convention, in fact, they mostly serve a functional value in rough conditions so things like robustness, tightness, and sturdiness come to mind if one asks the user of these products about what they value in them.

In lean we always start with quality, fix quality first as Deming said, and everything else follows from there. After all, it's useless to flow a product that is not up to scratch. It's also by investigating quality that we discover our misconceptions about the engineering of our products. Something is not working as it should, or we haven't found a different way around it so we make it very expensive. In this case, the strive for perfection was arguably getting in the way of profitability, because the only way they could make the product perfect was through rework.

Getting it wrong is not a bad thing though. It just means that you we a working hypothesis to confirm, adjust, or reject in the first place. Even Taichii Ohno points this out in his Workplace Management book. In fact, it's the first chapter. "The wise men mend their ways". In it, he recalls the Chinese proverb that states that a wise man might be right 7 out of 10 times, but even a thief is right 3 times out of seven. So for us mere mortals getting it right half the time is not so bad. It also means we need to accept that we get it wrong half the time and not be afraid to admit it and update our hypothesis.

When was the last time you got it wrong?

Jesper Sode Hansen

Daglig leder / Managing director

1 年

"Over Quality" is also a type of waste to eliminate.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Eivind Reke的更多文章

  • Addiction to Projects

    Addiction to Projects

    If you've attended business school, you have probably learned how to calculate and apply two classic formulas to inform…

    4 条评论
  • Madness, or the Ballé method?

    Madness, or the Ballé method?

    Over the past few years I've been lucky enough to walk the gemba with my two good friends, mentors, and co-authors…

    2 条评论
  • People Development

    People Development

    When one visits Toyota, it′s surprising to see the “Good Thinking, Good Products” banners and the emphasis on people…

    2 条评论
  • What is Your Motivation?

    What is Your Motivation?

    ?I′m curious, what is your motivation? ? my Sensei asked me, as we were heading for a Gemba visit. What was my…

    3 条评论
  • Learning To See The Product

    Learning To See The Product

    Since “The Machine That Changed the World” was first published in 1991, there has been a continued interest in applying…

    1 条评论
  • Genka Teigen

    Genka Teigen

    The Lean world has adopted a whole range of Japanese words and phrases to describe the different aspects of the…

    8 条评论
  • Discovery Part 2

    Discovery Part 2

    Last week one of our co-authors (Pascale Coignet) wrote about the need to set aside time for discovery. So, what does…

    2 条评论
  • If you want to learn - be honest, and practice

    If you want to learn - be honest, and practice

    As Organizational Secretary of LOS Norge (the learning organisation network in Norway), I get to visit several…

    4 条评论
  • Total Participation

    Total Participation

    There is a tendency, at least in Norway, to consider Lean a set of tools for process improvement and/or operational…

    1 条评论
  • Den glemte kvaliteten

    Den glemte kvaliteten

    Forbedret kvalitet f?rer til reduserte kostnader p? grunn av mindre omarbeid, mindre feil, mindre venting, bedre bruk…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了