Getting a Passport When You Have Criminal Cases Pending: A Court Case Example
Sudhir Rao
Advocate at Supreme Court of India & High Court of Delhi | ?????? | ?????? | ????.?? | ????.?? Criminal & Cyber Crime Lawyer | IPR, Property Law, Education Law, Service Law, Banking & Insurance Law, Arbitration, RERA..
This article explains a recent court case in India about getting a passport when you have criminal charges against you.
In the case of Kashif Ahmed v. Union of India, Criminal Writ Petition 2067/2024, the Lucknow High Court addressed the issue of passport issuance when a criminal case is pending. The petitioner, Kashif Ahmad, sought renewal of his passport, which had expired on November 30, 2019. His brother-in-law’s marriage was scheduled in Saudi Arabia on April 30, 2024, and he wished to attend the ceremony. However, five criminal cases were registered against him in December 2019 due to his protest against the Citizen Amendment Act and National Register for Citizens. Despite the pending criminal cases, the charges had not yet been framed by the court.
The Case Main Points:
Denial of Permission by the Magistrate
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Vth Lucknow denied permission for passport renewal, citing lack of jurisdiction. Frustrated by this denial, Kashif Ahmad approached the Lucknow High Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus.
Legal Arguments
Petitioner’s Counsel
The petitioner’s counsel argued that the Magistrate had not adequately considered the application. The denial of passport renewal solely based on pending criminal cases was unjust.
Respondent’s Counsel
The counsel for the Respondent-Union of India referred to an Office Memorandum dated October 10, 2019. According to this memorandum, citizens of India facing criminal proceedings could still obtain passports if they produced orders from the court concerned permitting them to travel abroad. The conditions for such issuance were as follows:
High Court’s Verdict
The Lucknow High Court allowed the writ petition on March 22, 2024. It emphasized that there could be no rigid formula regarding permission or no objection for passport issuance. The court upheld the petitioner’s right to personal liberty, including the right to possess a passport. Furthermore, the court clarified that passport renewal should not be denied solely due to pending criminal cases. Passports should be renewed for at least ten years, in accordance with Rule 12 of the Passport Rules 1980.
The Court's Decision:
What This Means:
Things to Consider: