Getting down to Business & looking back at International Women’s Day on March 8, 2024

FIRST AND FOREMOST :? Two of my best Mentors were Men who were Sr mgmt advocates for me and had a positive and profound impact on my career!? ??They loved my tenacity and self-motivation, fueled by my relentless drive and business savvy ways to find and close business, or in one job, 6am in the office everyday to manage the Commercial Paper Desk and Liquidity Risk mgmt, incorporating ethics and an appropriate amount of FUN ?as often as possible!? ??

I’m always up for a coffee or drink and ?some good food with a few laughs!

? I Practice what I Preach:? ?I hired 4 women and two men in my first three months ?at Lombard Risk mgmt, NYC office.? I ensured all ?base salaries were ?in line with competitive ?NYC market rates and everyone had a comp plan that was fairly and equitably based on Job function and performance measurements.? ??

A diverse team of people, including; ?Men, Women, straight and ?gay, several over the age of 45 and 50, Hispanic, Black, and White.? Many ?were new ?hires I made ?when I was hired as Managing Director, Head of Americas running the NYC office and reporting to the CEO in the London office.? He did support my new ?hires and diversity.? ??????????????

MATERIAL FACTS OF EVIDENCE prove, International Women’s Day is primarily a Marketing ?event for the biggest violators to spend their marketing ?budget, ?attempting to convince Men and Women, they are not violators, despite lawsuits against them.? A Marketing event Creating a facade to distract from the truth with?Compelling evidence found in Civil Actions filed in ?Federal courts!? AND ?there are many over the past 5-7 years including, this year, in 2024!? ?Most of which have? not, or were not, properly settled before the team of FEMALE ?BULL DOG Defense lawyers viciously attacked the woman for standing up against the employment violations!

THANKS to an increasing number of professional women that endure a lot of emotional distress to expose the unlawful business practices of Sexual Harrassment and Discrimination, trying to make it a better work place for everyone!

AND I would be remiss if I didn't acknowledge a few good men that I know, who, have stood up against sexual harrassment and gender discrimination, and Age Discrimination. Outen & Golden lawfirm represented one or two men in a Class Action against PWC for Age Discrimination, settled in or around 2021. ?

KEEPING IN MIND, there are the ?deep Corporate Pockets that often find ?their way into the Chambers of the Presiding Judge, influencing the Judge to squash the case? with the notorious ?Bad Judge Tool? “ A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT!? Allowing a Federal Judge to easily and quickly lighten their case load, ?with no real Discovery!? ?NO Jury or even a Bench trial by Granting the Motion for Summary Judgement in favor of the Perpetrators, often exposing the bad performance of the Judge and ?the clear ?bias;? accepting the lawyer lies as? gospel truth!? ?AS IF, the ?Plaintiff’s and Opposing Counsel ?won’t notice the Judge ?didn’t ?even read the Opposition with Material Fact exhibits of evidence, filed on the docket, ?proving the case was unethically squashed and further damaging the Plaintiff.?

?

?REMEMBER, the Judge is appointed for life and is paid six figures no matter how badly or unethically, they perform, damaging the Plaintiff’s for years without any opportunity for rebuttal and Opposition, UNLESS, you want to feed the same court system a lot ?more money and Years of Time to Appeal to a Higher Court? for another possible injustice that may deny you the opportunity to fully litigate your case and let a Jury of your peers decide the verdict and the damage award. OR accept a meaningful Settlement Offer before trial.

IN TODAY'S COURTS, there is evidence of unspoken strategies whereby, the Defense Counsel quietly sets the strategy with the Judge for a favorable ruling on a Dispositive Motion. The MSJ WILL BE GRANTED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENSE, NO MATTER how compelling & Truthful the evidence in opposition is written. An MSJ exercise making it appear on the surface it was a fair Discovery & litigation process. A Motion for Summary Judgement is a lot of legal work for both sides, the Defense counsel who files the MSJ and the Plaintiff that must respond.

A Magistrate Judge on one case for Consumer law violations, told me it would cost about $100k for the Defense Counsel of TransUnion to file the MSJ. Very useful information, considering, the damages exceeded $100k and TransUnion offerred only $10,000.00 to settle. I declined to Settle, knowing, the case would likely get unfairly dismissed & squashed by the next presiding Judge in line to do the dirty deeds of siding with the deep Corporate pockets. Unfortunately, I was right! Case# 2:20-cv-11-222, proved there was clear bias or incompetence by the new Judge assigned, who proved she didn't read the evidence in Opposition and a key exhibit showing the false, fraud data was still appearing on the Plaintiff's Credit Report with a TransUnion comment next to the line item stating the negative data would not be removed until 2026! A Credit Report produced by the lawyers of Transunion and sent to the Plaintiff before the Settlement court conference, held via phone before the Magistrate Judge, for which, TransUnion's Counsel didn't notice they incriminated themselves by having sworn before the Magistrate Judge and in their MSJ, the false fraud data was removed a year or so back! Somehow, they knew or figured, they would still get the case squashed with an MSJ ruling in their favor by a Presiding Judge. I hate being right in this particular instance! Five more years of damages causing more Civil Actions with financial damages accumulating to well over $500k and some damages that are irreversible, for which, money can no longer repair! ?

==============================end ????????

?

? ?