GERMANY TRIES TO SAVE ITSELF WITH LIES

For some (short) time, Germany has understood "by force" that the energy plan is a lie.?

The country does not have sustainable generation, nor does it have storage, nor ports or logistics installed to mobilize the "supposed" existing energy.

The truth is that there was never a strategic plan, and much less is it an example of leadership clean technologies, but that is what they try to show the world after their energy "false plan" existed. That lie fell apart with the war in the Ukraine and the interruptions in the supply of essential supplies from Russia, so great was the position of inclination that Angela Merkel and all the majority of former German ministers held towards Russia.? Completely halting the development of clean energy engineering and its application, the country cast aside its identity as one of the forefront of more clean technologies to be sold to Putin for handouts.

In this way it was that Germany became fossil dependent, so much so that it was the last to agree to cut off payments and supplies to Russia. Opposing the cessation of sending energy from the Kremlin.

RELUCTANT ACCEPTANCE

Olaf Scholz was the last politician in Europe to condemn Putin and the one who intermediated the most with Macron (on his knees, RIDICULOUS) so that shipments of raw materials (energy and now food) are not interrupted.

Now that the obvious energy and food crisis is in the headlines, Scholz came out to condemn Russia and urge that Vladimir Putin's supply lines be cut off.

But late, late to try to find a plan, "a plan that never came."

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz promised that "his government will not leave citizens frozen or unable to pay their energy bills, but he acknowledged that his country faces considerable challenges in the coming months."

THE SOLUTION ACCORDING TO OLAF..

Subsidized Gas and Hydrogen is Promised to the Underworld |? ????????

Germany is pricing in the introduction of natural gas subsidies from January as the country seeks to cushion costs for households and businesses amid the energy crisis. A government-appointed panel had recommended a start in March or April 2023, mainly because utilities will need some time to iron out technical issues.

The Strategic Supply Plan

It was the reopening of coal mines, increasing fracking in distant countries and until previously (November 2021 at COP26 in Glasgow) denied LNG as renewable.

LIES AND MORE LIES

Many believe that the unfulfillable promises of new energies or replacement by LNG will counteract the aggravation of the situation. Germany does not have a plan to replace LNG, there are simply no ships and many ports with the necessary storage to unload through pipelines.

Far away are the regasification stations that do not yet exist in the Baltic ports and other regions.

Then it remains to ask ourselves if the LNG producing countries have the capacity of liquefiers to load on ships that do not exist (next point ships).

Liquefiers: They are the process of reducing natural gas to a size 600 times smaller, in order to be transported.

Regasifiers: Technology that consists of returning the size and natural state of the gas after being transported, in which the pressurized and requalified processes lose a percentage of what was initially declared.

LNG Ships: They are the specific ones to transport the gas, which are approximately 600 ????

?https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:-12.1/centery:25.0/zoom:4

Those approximately 600 boats are arranged as follows that I explain in March 2022 in the following post ??????

https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/diego-balverde_blooding-the-world-the-bad-decisions-in-activity-6928449482619523072-TnnO?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android

FALSE PROMISES

The United States promises to offset Europe's move away from dependence on Russia, by sending reserves EXISTING?? of Gas through LNG transport.

The same LNG that had been removed from the list of renewables, as it is considered fossil energy.

REALITY

A methane tanker starts at 100,000 m3 of capacity at 266,000 m3, which is the maximum size supported by architecture based on maritime safety. The "average" 74% of vessels are up to 180,000 m3 in size and the remaining 26% up to 266,000 m3.

If we put an average of 180,000 m3 per 600 existing methane tankers in the world, the figure gives us 108,000,000 m3 of transport power.

If we know that the compression of the product is 600 times when returning its state of consumption, we would have to multiply 108 million m3 by 600, which gives us *64,800,000,000 m3* (although there are considerable atmospheric losses, as in oil).

COMPARISON

60 billion m3 is the annual consumption of Mexico.

Germany only consumes 96 billion m3 of gas.

Apart from the fact that 11% of the ships are available and unloaded on western soil (the rest with contracts).

In other words, there are 7 billion m3 available, 90 times less than what Europe consumes alone.

CONSUMPTION

The European Community (countries included) consumes 490 billion m3 annually.

LOGISTICS

The price of moving 50 empty ships from Asia and taking them to the United States to load can increase the value between 16% and 19%.Then you have to lower it in a regasification unit (of which 4% exist) or in storage storage of 13% (which do not exist in those dimensions of need) because Germany and the West removed gas from the list of renewables for the proceeding of fossils.

In 2022, it was included again and the coal that was reused "we pretend to ignore what happens".

Then we find Shell generating profits 3 times above its own annual projections and believes that by dividing profits among the few shareholders with profits to the liquidation of dividends that gives them the profits of the war.

SYNTHESIS:

Wouldn't it be better if the companies that finance the war by buying from Russia compensate for the losses due to the rise in average international inflation? Or that they invest in the energy transition betting on projects that are waiting for a tangible investment. In the meantime,

"They are bleeding the world dry for their ambitions."

GERMANY PROMISING SOMETHING IT DOESN'T HAVE

In recent times, the Baltic country has gone looking for underdeveloped countries to sell lies and has long been trying to teach practices that it does not know and that it stopped practicing years ago.

This is why it is good for the world to know that hydrogen is great, in a few years and the current crisis in Germany is for not having solutions. The discussion about not moving away from the dependence on the Russian fossil supply is one of the main reasons why the desperation to catch resources in underdeveloped countries has increased.

Let's be clear, if the country's need had never been so high, and the case of hydrogen was working.

The energy crisis would not exist, that is why it is better Scholz's desperation to find cheap resources precipitates the speed of the lies that are spreading around the world, under the slogan: Opportunity, Challenges and the need itself URGENCY.

ENTERTAINING UNDERDEVELOPED COUNTRIES

With these 3 words:

Opportunity: for them to find solutions, in a world in which hydrogen still does not work and is projected as a base of assumed sustainability of only 4% to 6% in 10 years.

Challenges: they are those that the country has ahead of it, to convince society that they have everything under control. Developing lies in distant lands and soon mounting cheap sets to calm the tensions of the population of the following years of scarcity that Germany is going through.

Urgency: it is what Germany demonstrates by going out to look for "scenographic montages" to show German society that they have the solution in their hands, ?SERIOUS LIES!

Let's just hope that the sustainability lies that started with Schroeder, continued with Merkel and continue with Olaf Scholz. Which nullified the investment and development of engineering, technologies of which Germany knew how to be a leader in innovation.

"Germany needs more investment and attention to innovation, technologies and engineering that are the basis of the country's idiosyncrasies, which have always placed them high in international innovation."