Geometallurgy in a Sparse Data World: Balancing Legibility and Accuracy
In geometallurgy, we often find ourselves navigating a terrain of sparse data. How do we create meaningful models when comprehensive data is a luxury we rarely have?
The Sparse Data Dilemma
Imagine mapping the transition from oxides to sulfides in a copper deposit without soluble copper assays. We're left to rely on tangential metrics like total copper or visual logging. This scenario is all too common in geometallurgy, where the absence of critical data forces us to seek correlations that may be coincidental rather than causal.
Overanalyzing the wrong features cannot compensate for the absence of the right data.
Legibility vs. Accuracy in Geometallurgy
The Pitfalls of Pursuing Accuracy
While the allure of complex statistical models is strong, especially when data is limited, we must be cautious. These models might appear to extract more information, but they often risk overfitting, leading to unreliable predictions.
The Case for Legibility
Legibility in geometallurgical models isn't just about simplicity—it's about plausibility. A model that aligns with known geological and metallurgical processes is more likely to be robust when new, sparse data is introduced. This approach offers practical benefits:
- Operational Utility: Operations teams can understand and trust legible models.
- Continuous Improvement: With clear models, teams can focus on refining domains, optimizing mine plans, and conducting targeted metallurgical testwork.
A Real-World Example
Consider a copper deposit where most samples contain easily depressed arsenopyrite, but some show high arsenic recovery. Simple assays for Cu, Fe, S, and As won't differentiate between chalcopyrite plus arsenopyrite and enargite. In this scenario:
- Relying on multielement regressions with limited samples is risky.
- Complex equations might show high statistical correlation but lack geometallurgical meaning.
领英推è
We must not lose sight that geology and mineral textures usually drive variations in metallurgical performance.
The Power of Simplicity
Given the choice between a domain average with a clear uncertainty range and a complex, opaque algorithm, opt for simplicity. Here's why:
- Transparency: Communicating uncertainty is valuable for stakeholders.
- Risk Assessment: Clear models allow for better quantification and management of risks.
- Informed Decision-Making: Simplicity enables rational decisions based on known limitations.
Tools and Their Limitations
While tools like Targets in Cancha offer new methods for model creation and comparison, they're not a silver bullet. These tools are only as good as the geological understanding informing their use and cannot compensate for missing critical data.
However, Cancha goes beyond just model creation. It also provides interactive visualization tools such as logs, plots, and 3D visualizations. These features are crucial for maximizing communication between geologists and metallurgists, facilitating a deeper understanding of the data and helping teams get to the root cause of geometallurgical issues. By enabling professionals from different disciplines to visualize and interact with the same data in various formats, Cancha bridges the gap between geological knowledge and metallurgical outcomes, fostering more informed decision-making.
Despite these advanced features, it's important to remember that even the best tools cannot replace sound geological reasoning and metallurgical expertise. They are aids to enhance our understanding and decision-making processes, not substitutes for domain knowledge and critical thinking.
Conclusion
The goal in geometallurgy is to develop models that maximize the value of limited data while remaining geologically and metallurgically plausible. This requires:
- Collaboration between geology and metallurgy
- Understanding of statistical techniques
- Prioritizing geometallurgical sense over statistical fit
What challenges have you faced in geometallurgical modeling with limited data? How do you balance legibility and accuracy in your work? Share your experiences and insights in the comments below.
#CanchaCanHelp #Geometallurgy
General Manager Studies / Project Director
7 个月Hi Adam You did a good job stringing the following, insightful sentence together: "it's important to remember that even the best tools cannot replace sound geological reasoning and metallurgical expertise. They are aids to enhance our understanding and decision-making processes, not substitutes for domain knowledge and critical thinking." It applies to many of the tools we use today. Just because there is a pretty graph, it doesn't mean it actually makes sense. i.e. Correlation or causation cheers JohnM
Ingeniero QuÃmico CIP 270422
7 个月Excelente
Metallurgy Superintendent/ Lean Six Sigma Green Belt
7 个月ANDRIANJAKASOA Mamimbola Miharisoa
Principal Geologist at Entech Pty Ltd
7 个月Well said Adam. Great reminder for everyone who works with geological uncertainty.