Generic & Best Practice Principles When Developing Aviation Safety Performance Indicators (SPI’s)
Concerning Ownership -?Responsibilities, Choice of Criteria & Standards, Administrative Processes, and Arrangements to provide for Development and Continuous Oversight of SPIs should be defined as part of the safety management system.
SPI’s Integrated widely into the Organizational Management System?-?To ensure that SPI’s are available to fully support the leadership team decision-making process they should be developed as an integral part of the business process oversight.
Ensuring Full Engagement –?To maximize positive engagement SPIs should be fully aligned during the development to ensure that they connect appropriately with ownership and responsibilities of a particular business area.
Addressing the Organizational Hazard Profile -?To?optimize the performance monitoring process SPI’s?should be established using an objectively (Data-Driven Approach) and as far as possible based on the widest business objectives and ensuring full consideration is given to the hazard profile of the organisation.
Building a Framework of Diverse Indicators –?To?provide full value to the SMS System The SPI framework should include the following where possible:
领英推荐
Frequency of Monitoring of SPI’s?- It is important that SPIs are measured, monitored, and reported on a regular basis, noting that over-monitoring is not beneficial rather to build a manageable data set which can provide the necessary metrics.
Recording of SPI’s -?Individual SPIs should be wherever possible simple & clearly understood and recorded within the safety management system.
The Need for Continuous Review –?The value (return on Investment essentially) of our chosen SPIs should be subject to regular review to ensure:
Next Steps
Please see?www.sassofia.com,?www.sofemaonline.com?or email?[email protected]