Is Generative AI the Junk Food of Content?
Opus will snip up your long videos and even score them as to how and why they’ll perform. It’s astounding. Image credit: Opus.Pro

Is Generative AI the Junk Food of Content?

The content of the water hose overfloweth. According to various estimates, every day about 4.5 million blog posts are published on WordPress. Additionally, more than 500 million tweets are sent each day on Twitter (subject to change based on the variable X), and more than 500 hours of video content are uploaded to YouTube every minute. Video is now responsible for more than 50% of all Internet content.


Generative AI’s raison d'être, at least for the moment, is to help us produce all of this stuff even faster. But is snackable content just digital junk food? After living in the trenches with Generative AI for the past 6 months, we’re realizing that AI might be better at cutting and snipping than creating.?


Will fast food AI churn out better content? The jury’s still out. But it might get watched more if it’s shorter. According to Pex, around 90% of videos people upload on their YouTube channels never reach 1,000 views. For a video-sharing site that gets more than 5 billion views daily, that’s a lot of under-consumed content.


What’s new in the world of fast-food Generative AI? For academics and academic wannabes, there’s PaperTalk.io. Astoundingly, it will take an inscrutable academic paper (I believe academics are secretly paid by the word) and provide a really solid summary. Here’s an example showing how it took a full-length academic paper, shrunk it to size, and even included an audiobook-like transcript for read-a-phobics.?

No alt text provided for this image


Then there’s what Axios calls “smart brevity.” Axios began its life as a daily email newsletter to provide a summary of top news stories from around the world in a quickly digestible format. It named its particular writing formula Smart Brevity. Now Axios has codified “Smart Brevity” into a Axios HQ, a commercial AI that helps us all be brief and to the point. You enter an outline of what you’d like to say and Axios HQ does the rest. HQ is big on bullet points, headlines, subheads, and underscoring what’s important for the reader. Good for PR, HR, and corporate team members who want their communications read and not deleted. Pricing is based on the organization's size and (sigh) there is no free trial.


For video, it’s the same story. Cut that CEO’s 45-minute speech down to a digestible series of bullet points. Or cut a 45-minute webinar down to a quick snack break. Our latest faves in this booming category are Vidyo and Opus. Both get Ph.D.s in taking a long-form video and finding the most salient parts.?


Conor Eliot, Head of Creator of Partnerships at Opus, told me that even his own team was surprised at the enthusiasm of the corporate world about Opus. The AI was designed with creators in mind but quickly found a need to cut video in so many different instances, from real estate to product launches.?Both programs have different approaches and features but basically, they ingest a long video and chop them up into juicy parts.

No alt text provided for this image
On an amusing note, Ben Parr was incorrectly identified as Ben Affleck. An easy edit but it made for a good chuckle. Image credit: Vidyo






Alfred Poor

Keynote Speaker and Video Meeting Advisor, helping executives be more persuasive and influential in their video meetings and online presentations.

1 年

This is not an entirely new phenomenon, but as with so many areas, technology has accelerated and amplified the problems. Take traditional "dead tree" books, for example. According to Publishers Weekly, in 2004 the average title sold fewer than 500 copies. (https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/columns-and-blogs/soapbox/article/6153-a-bookselling-tail.html) 80% of all titles sold fewer than 100 copies. Only 10 books sold more than a million copies. We were awash in information long before generative AI tools hit the scene, but definitely it's only making the problem worse. AI is writing books for publication on Amazon (https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-launches-boom-ai-written-e-books-amazon-2023-02-21/) and while they may not make much money individually, they can make an "author" some significant income in aggregate. And AI is getting better rapidly. We already have social media influencers with millions of followers who are entirely computer generated (https://www.insg.co/en/virtual-influencers-world/). I do expect that we'll soon be getting lots of quality content of all sorts with minimal input from human creators. Maybe the junk food won't reach Michelin quality but it will be good enough for many tastes.

Rob Tiffany??

Research Director @ IDC

1 年

It’s definitely digital junk food

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了