A Game Theoretic Approach to Optimizing FinOps Decisions

Introduction

?This article explores how basic game theory concepts can be applied to enhance data-driven decision making for FinOps teams across a variety of scenarios. Game theory provides a powerful mathematical framework to model and analyze complex multi-criteria decisions involving financial trade-offs under uncertainty. The key principles of analyzing incentives, risks, equilibria, and optimization strategies can significantly enrich technical skillsets.

?

Key Game Theory Concepts

?Game theory involves analyzing strategic decision making through several key concepts:

?

• Players - The decision makers or actors, each with distinct incentives and goals
• Strategies - The options or moves available to each player
• Payoffs - Quantitative values that represent players' motivations under different strategy combinations
• Equilibrium - A stable state where players have adopted mutually optimal strategies
• Minimax/Regret - Choosing the option that minimizes maximum downside risk

?

Prisoners Dilemma Example

The classic thought experiment is that two prisoners must decide whether to confess or deny a crime. Applying game theory:

?

• The players are the two prisoners
• The strategies are to confess or deny
• The payoffs are the sentence lengths based on the combined strategies. Confessing when the other denies results in freedom versus a long sentence.
• The equilibrium or stable state is when both prisoners confess - known as the Nash equilibrium
• Minimax means both prisoners confess to minimize maximum sentence length

?This simple example demonstrates how the core concepts of players, strategies, payoffs, equilibrium and minimax play out in a scenario. The lessons can be applied to more complex multi-player decisions.

?

What is FinOps?

?FinOps is a set of practices, skills and tools that enable organizations to gain transparency into their cloud costs and consumption. The key goals of FinOps include:

?

• Cloud cost visibility and accountability across teams
• Empowering engineers to make cost-aware cloud architecture and usage decisions
• Proactively optimizing cloud budgets and spend to align usage to business value

?As cloud costs grow into millions of dollars, FinOps has emerged as a critical capability for enterprises to maximize cloud value through continuous improvement of spending efficiency.

?

Some Examples

Here are some of the examples I recently worked on with my team to help clients ensure they are getting the best value for money on the cloud.

?

Cloud Spend Optimization Example

?A key problem is how to accurately forecast and optimize cloud spend across complex and ever-changing pricing models. Game theory can be applied:

• The players are the cloud vendor pricing team against the enterprise FinOps team. Both are economically rational actors.
• The strategies involve analyzing historical usage patterns, mapping out pricing models under different capacity purchase levels, and forecasting future trends.
• The payoffs are performing cost versus revenue analysis to quantify the financial outcomes for both sides under different strategies.
• Finding the equilibrium shows the optimal responses for FinOps to adjust capacity purchases and instance types in response to vendor pricing changes.

This provides data-driven forecasts powered by game theory to right-size cloud resources in a way that optimizes the payoff for both the vendor and customer.

?

Incentive Design Example

?FinOps teams need to influence developers to make cost-aware cloud architecture and usage decisions, without compromising innovation velocity. Game theory can be applied:

• Model developers as economically rational players
• Use incentives so cost awareness and optimization is directly rewarded through compensation, recognition, or other benefits
• Analyze payoff scenarios to create win-win utilization where both developers and the business maximize their outcomes
• Find equilibrium incentives that align developer goals with business objectives and prevent frustration

This creates sustainable outcomes by using game theory principles to align incentives between developers and the broader business goals.

?

SQL Migration Example

?When assessing migrating from SQL Server to cloud-native data platforms like Databricks:

• ?The players are the SQL team against the cloud vendor against the FinOps/BI teams
• The strategies involve maintaining on-prem SQL versus migrating to the cloud vendors' managed service
• The payoffs involve analyzing cost, performance, capabilities, and opportunity cost
• The equilibrium shifts based on weighing value versus switching cost

Using game theory informs vendor competitive dynamics and charts the optimal customer migration path.

?

FinOps Reporting Example

?To better align report creators and consumers:

• The players are the FinOps analytics team against the engineering/business users
• Strategies involve detailed, complex reports versus simplified high-level reports
• Payoffs involve depth of analysis versus accessibility and ease of consumption
• The equilibrium is layered reports balancing both needs through simplification, visualization, and self-service

Involving users in design and simplifying reports creates this win-win balance.

?

Conclusion

In summary, incorporating game theory concepts like analyzing incentives, risks, and equilibria can significantly enrich technical skillsets. With training, FinOps practitioners can adopt a strategic mindset powered by game theory to enable more financially optimized data-driven decision making.