Gaining Clarity In The Fog Of War (Silicon Valley Bank's Duration Wipeout)
Chart Booklet & More
Access this week's chart booklet?with a look at Silicon Valley Bank 's duration mismatch and last week's Nonfarm Payrolls data. We also cover in-depth corporate trends with 摩根士丹利 , UnitedHealth Group , and Adobe . We will provide an updated chart book with more data on corporate trends when we release Triple Play Episode 11!
?
Triple Play Podcast
Don't miss episode 10 of our?Triple Play Podcast! Bill Baruch and Jannis M. discuss the latest macro trends and share three actionable stock ideas.
Macro & Financial Conditions
Silicon Valley Bank Failure & The Regulators' Response
The United States Federal Reserve has two congressional mandates: an average inflation target of 2% and full employment. As Jerome Powell has talked about in many instances, without 2% average inflation, all aspects of the economy suffer. Yet on Friday, the Fed's third mandate came into play: financial stability. Financial stability writ large refers to the US financial system on which millions of people rely daily to meet payroll, finance the working capital of corporations, and draw money from credit lines to meet obligations. Absent the banking system's willingness to lend money while assuring depositors their money is safe, nothing else in the economy works. Yes, nothing else.
Last week, Silicon Valley Bank raised ~$2bn in equity capital given that its significant unmarked mortgage-backed securities losses it had bought at the bond market peak in 2020 would mean a wipe out of its equity if it had to use those securities to meet deposit outflows. To put some numbers behind the duration mismatch, SVB was banking high cash-burning startups with daily liquidity needs. Still, as the bank's deposits grew from $61bn in Q4 2019 to $189bn in Q4 2021, so did the bank's mortgage-backed securities holdings (~$173bn in Q4 2022; via Raging Capital Ventures on?Twitter). As a yield-enhancing strategy, the bank took on massive duration risk, increasing its MBS holdings by 6.5x, buying $88bn of mortgage paper. The company's footnotes disclosed that those same securities holdings had an unmarked loss of ~$15bn if they had to be sold, exceeding the company's equity of ~$12bn before the wipeout unfolded.?
Concerns around SVB's liquidity position started a cascade of venture capitalists and start-ups who hit the outbound wire button, causing the bank's liquidity position to worsen to the point where the FDIC had to come in on Friday and put the bank into receivership; receivership means that the regulatory agency started a process of finding buyers for the bank and if it couldn't find a buyer start to pay out bank deposits while initiating sales of existing assets.?
Rough estimates concluded that uninsured deposits, of which Silicon Valley had more than 90%, would receive ~70-80 cents on the Dollar, meaning that anyone who left money with the bank would see a 20-30% loss. According to Marc Rubenstein on?Twitter, SVB had 37,466 deposit accounts with an average balance of $4.2m (clearly exceeding the FDIC's deposit insurance limitbof $250k.)?
As a tech-focused bank serving companies and venture capital firms whose deposits require high agility, the response to the bank's duration mismatch triggered the bank's failure.?
Notice that short sellers had already targeted the bank, as the Financial Times reported on Feb. 22, 2023. The?Financial Times?talked about that very mismatch.
Customer deposits surged from $102bn to $189bn, leaving the bank awash in "excess liquidity". The bank piled much of its customer deposits into long-dated mortgage-backed securities issued by US government agencies, effectively locking away half of its assets for the next decade in safe investments that earn, by today's standards, little income.?
Thus, after the bank went into receivership on Friday, all eyes were on the Fed's and the Treasury's next steps. Absent an assurance that all depositors would receive their money back, classic bank runs, as experienced by SVB, were feared across the banking system. First Regional Bank's stock was substantially lower in Friday's trading session, fearing that its lending activities in the private equity arena could lead to a similar run. Perhaps even more significantly, Charles Schwab, with more than $7 trillion in customer deposits, became another target for a potential duration mismatch. Having seen a decrease in Schwab's available-for-sale securities from $390bn in Q4 2022 to $147 in Q4 2022 while held-to-maturity securities increased from $105.3bn (Q1 2022) to $173.1bn (Q4 2022), the stock traded below $60 on Friday.?
The implications of what happened to SVB caused regulators to step in decisively?Sunday night:
After receiving a recommendation from the board of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve, and consulting with the President, Secretary Yellen approved actions enabling the FDIC to complete its resolution of Silicon Valley Bank, Santa Clara, California, in a manner that fully protects all depositors. Depositors will have access to all of their money starting Monday, March 13. No losses associated with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank will be borne by the taxpayer.?
In an additional step to address existing funding concerns, the Fed also?announced?a liquidity provision facility by creating a new Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP). In the term sheet of the liquidity facility, the Fed states that the collateral used will be valued at par.
As a result, uninsured depositors don't have to worry about their bank's liquidity position even if the duration mismatch persists.?
To quote Nick Timiarios'?Tweet?in response to the Fed's actions:
Dan Taruollo: We learned today that a $200bn bank was too big to fail - or at least too big to be allowed to fail with losses borne by large depositors, as the bank resolution system assumes.
Despite the Fed's response with a $25bn Treasury backstop of the BTFP facility, Frist Republic Bank is down 63% pre-market after Signature Bank was put into receivership Sunday night. Jim Chanos?tweeted?in response to the regulators' actions:
I'd just like point out that none of these policies address the fundamental duration mismatch...the inability so far for the FDIC to find a buyer for the SIVB deposit base (or the bank to find investors last week), should be a warning sign for equity values.
Thus, if banks aren't hedging their interest rate exposure with interest rate swaps, then US commercial banks appear to hold ~$4.25trn in treasury and agency securities ($2.72trn of which are MBS), down from $4.56trn. The mismatch between depositors' needs and the banks' holdings is cause for concern as long as today's fears persist.
In a flight to safety, the 2-year treasury yield is trading below 4% this morning after setting new local highs above 5%.?
?
Take advantage of last week's?Triple Play Podcast,?where Bill Baruch and Jannis Meindl cover the latest macro and corporate trends.?
?
Nonfarm Payrolls Review
After adding 504k jobs in January (revised down from 517k), the BLS reported 311k jobs added in February, another hot print. Nevertheless, M/M wage increased at 0.24%, indicating an annualized rate of ~2.9%. The most significant job adds were in lower-wage industries, including leisure & hospitality, at 105k job additions, indicating that the data might be slightly skewed to the downside. Using February's monthly wage trends to extrapolate wage trends into the future, the same monthly rate increase would get us to 3.30% Y/Y of total private by October.?
?
Please find more information in our?chart pack. All the weekly data releases will be covered in our daily Morning Express, authored by Bill Baruch.
?
Don't miss?Episode 10?of our Triple Play Podcast -- Bill Baruch and Jannis Meindl share their thoughts on Schlumberger, Palo Alto Networks, and Uber.
?
Chart-Pack Macro Slides
领英推荐
Stay tuned for Episode 11 of Triple Play!
Until next time, good luck & good trading.
Be sure to check out prior writing of?Top Things to Watch this Week:
Our?Blue Line Futures Trade Desk?is here to talk about positioning, idea and strategy generation, assisted accounts, and more! Don't miss our daily Research with actionable ideas?(Click Here To Sign Up)?
Schedule a Consultation?or?Open your free Futures Account?today by clicking on the icon above or?here.?Email?[email protected]?or call?312-278-0500?with any questions!
Economic Calendar
U.S.
Data Release Times (C.T.)
China
Data Release Times (C.T.)
Eurozone
Data Release Times (C.T.)
More Of The Upcoming Economic Data Points Can Be Found?Here.
Blue Line Capital
If you have questions about any of the earnings reports, our wealth management arm, Blue Line Capital, is here to discuss! Email?[email protected]?or call 312-837-3944 with any questions!?Visit Blue Line Capital's Website
Learn at Blue Line University
At Blue Line Futures, we aim to make futures trading as accessible to everyone as possible. We focus on elevating?you?to your?maximum trading potential.
Take a crash course below or explore our wide variety of courses and education material for all experience levels.
Micro WTI Crude Oil Futures
Micro contracts are 1/10th the size of the standard contract with a 1 cent tick increment ($1/tick). The Micro Crude Contract increases flexibility and precision while maintaining nearly 24-hour access from Sunday through Friday. With lower margin requirements, the advantage of futures over ETFs becomes ever greater. Rather than react, traders can act on market information around the clock while enjoying the 60/40 tax rule: 60% profits are taxed as long-term capital gains, 40% as short-term capital gains.?
Micro E-mini Equity Futures
When Blue Line Futures' management started trading, the Nasdaq-100 traded at 1/10th of its current value. As the world became more digitized and technology stocks' market cap grew, so did the E-mini Nasdaq 100 futures contract. In other words, the contract is 10x as large as when our leadership started trading. In order to control a contract of equivalent size, you can now trade E-mini Micro Equity Futures that enjoy the same benefits while helping you size your trades. All the necessary information is available here!
#siliconvallleybank #payroll #nasdaq #trading #futures #fed #podcast #regulation #banking #economy #adobe
Futures trading involves substantial risk of loss and may not be suitable for all investors.