The Future of Wire Bonds in Electronics Assembly and Packaging

Wire bonding is a workhorse of electronics assembly, providing the connections between an integrated circuit (IC) and the outside world. This deceptively simple technology has been around since the 1950s and has grown alongside the electronics industry, maintaining its position as the dominant form of chip-to-package interconnection for several reasons: reliability, cost-effectiveness, and adaptability.

But as demands for higher power, interconnect density, and three-dimensional (3D) integration push the limits of wire bonding, we’re left to wonder: will wire bonding survive in a future increasingly dominated by miniaturisation and high-performance demands, or will new interconnect technologies take the reins?

?

Where It All Began: The Origins of Wire Bonding

Wire bonding began as a simple method to electrically connect an IC to the outside world by connecting small gold or aluminium wires from the chip to the lead frame of the package. These tiny wires—thinner than a human hair—form a bridge that allows electrical signals to flow, literally wiring the chip into its package.

For decades, the simplicity and reliability of wire bonding made it an industry standard, and innovations like wedge, ball, and stud bonding helped it evolve to meet different packaging needs. Even as other interconnect technologies like flip-chip and Through-Silicon Vias (TSVs) entered the market, wire bonding continued to play a critical role.

Personally, I’ve had a love/hate relationship with wire bonding since my PhD days. I developed some internal test structures for MEMS and found myself having to connect my tiny chips electrically to test them. With an old wire bonder in the university cleanroom, I got to know it, it’s internal workings and quite literally, its personality, very well! Whilst that experience was agonising at the time, I learned a lot more about the wire bonding process and failure mechanisms from direct experience than I ever would have from textbooks. On the face of it, wire bonding is a relatively simple process, but the intricacies of the material interaction and evolution over time is fascinating. Some of my favourite investigations over the years have been centred around wire bonds. Some examples:

·?????? Kirkendall voids (caused by a difference on gold and aluminium diffusion rates) formed at the interface and led to unzipping of the bond interface as the voids joined together. Kirkendall voids are tiny, empty spaces that form in materials when atoms of two different metals mix unevenly. Imagine two groups of people swapping places but one group moves faster than the other. In the gap left behind, you’d start seeing empty spaces. In metals, this can cause weaknesses and eventually lead to cracks or failure.

·?????? Electromigration of silver from an LED bond across the mesa leading to light dimming. The mesa is a raised platform (or a table as is its literally translation from Spanish) where light is created and guided to limit where it spreads. Control of the mesa ensures light shines brightly in the right direction.

·?????? Corrosion of a specific intermetallic phase contained in the bond as a result of potting contamination. This led to a reduction in conductivity and volume expansion causing final catastrophic failure. An intermetallic compound is exactly that, a mix of aluminium and gold in this case. To protect the bonds in application, they were coated in a potting material which happened to be contaminated. The reaction that took place was the wire bond equivalent of elephant’s toothpaste which destroyed the bond, package and device!

Wire bond related failures can really throw up some interesting and unexpected root-causes.???

?

The Role of Aluminium Wire Bonding in Automotive and Power Applications

While gold wire dominated the field for decades, aluminium emerged as an essential material in automotive and power applications, where cost-effectiveness and robust performance in harsh environments are crucial. Aluminium wire bonds are highly resistant to thermal cycling and fatigue, making them well-suited for power devices and automotive electronics, which face wide temperature swings and mechanical stress. Additionally, aluminium's natural oxide layer provides a degree of environmental protection, and its relatively high conductivity is well-suited to handle higher currents in power applications.

In automotive electronics, aluminium bonding often connects power modules in electric vehicles (EVs), where reliability and cost control are paramount. However, aluminium’s brittleness poses a challenge under high-stress conditions, so bonding techniques and design layouts are carefully engineered to mitigate mechanical failures.

?

New Materials: Innovation for Longevity

In recent years, the materials used in wire bonding have seen a bit of a shake-up. While gold wire was once the gold standard, increasing prices led many in the industry to switch to copper and, more recently, silver alloys. Copper wires, for example, are cheaper and offer excellent electrical and thermal performance, though they require more careful handling due to oxidation risks. Silver alloy wires present another alternative, balancing cost and performance with lower oxidation concerns than copper.

These materials have expanded wire bonding's reach into higher-power applications, as both copper and silver have better thermal conductivity than gold.

?

Limitations of Wire Bonding: Interconnect Density, Power Applications, and 3D Integration

As advanced applications demand more from interconnects, wire bonding faces some undeniable challenges. Let’s look at three of the most significant ones:

1. Interconnect Density: As chips get more complex, the number of connections needed per IC skyrockets. Wire bonding’s inherent structure—where each wire is placed individually—limits how close these connections can get. In high-density applications like smartphones and other portable electronics, space is precious, and wire bonding simply can’t keep up with the packing density that techniques like flip-chip or TSVs provide.
2. Power Applications: In high-power applications, the current-carrying capacity of a wire bond becomes a bottleneck. While copper and silver have helped somewhat, wire bonds can’t always carry the same current as bump-based interconnects, which have larger cross-sectional areas. This can lead to issues with heating and electromigration over time, shortening the lifespan of the bond and potentially of the device itself.
3. 3D Integration: As we move toward 3D stacked ICs to save space and improve performance, the traditional 2D wire-bond structure becomes a hurdle. TSVs and similar technologies can integrate multiple layers far more easily, enabling faster data transfer and lower latency. Wire bonds, meanwhile, are traditionally limited to single-layer connectivity, making them less ideal for complex 3D stacks. That said, I’ve seen plenty of stacked memory chips with wire bond connections on all layers.

?

The Future: Will Wire Bonding Survive or Be Replaced?

So, is wire bonding here to stay? Or are we witnessing its twilight years as other technologies take over?

Designs and assembly changes are already beginning to alter the requirements for interconnects. Modular chip designs and die to wafer (D2W) processes for example, reduce the need for ultra-dense wire bonds through use of TSVs. Looking forward, individual chips within a module may communicate with one another via different types of interconnects, like optical or RF interconnects, that don’t require traditional bonding.

While it’s true that wire bonding may face an uphill battle in high-density, high-power, and 3D applications, it’s likely to remain relevant in certain areas.

Industry is moving toward interconnects that better meet the demands of modern electronics. These may eventually outpace wire bonding in the most demanding sectors. But there are still new, potentially game-changing innovations in wire bonding. Adaptive techniques, like finer control of wire placement, and hybrid bonding—combining different interconnect types in the same package—could extend its utility, offering new flexibility.

?

Conclusion: Wire Bonding’s Evolving Role

While it’s unlikely that wire bonding will completely disappear from the electronics landscape, its role may shift in the coming years. For the highest-performance applications, advanced interconnect technologies are already taking the lead. But for cost-sensitive or lower-density applications, wire bonding will likely remain an essential technique, buoyed by improvements in materials and process adaptability.

In essence, the future of wire bonding will be one of adaptation. The method that once revolutionised electronics by connecting ICs to the outside world may not be the king of the hill anymore, but it still has plenty to offer, evolving to meet specific needs within an ever-diversifying electronics ecosystem.

While it may be too soon to say goodbye to wire bonds, it’s safe to say that the technology will look a little different as it finds its niche in the complex puzzle of modern electronics assembly and packaging.

?

Designers and manufacturers are experts in so many aspects that are critical to successful, reliable products. However, they often do not have the materials knowledge or experience to interpret the evidence that failure investigations liberate. If you would like support through services, consultancy or training, get in touch with Suzanne Costello on enquiries@forensic-eyes.com

Follow Forensic Eyes on Linkedin and sign up to receive a copy of future blogs linkedin.com/company/forensic-eyes-ltd