The future of rail freight

The future of rail freight

Blog by Helen McAllister, Programme Director (Freight Reform), GBRTT

Since I joined the rail industry 18 years ago, I have been lucky enough to hold a number of business and network strategic planning roles. Now at the Great British Railways Transition Team (GBRTT), I have been given the opportunity to really make a difference in how rail freight contributes to the UK economy.?

It is an exciting role. It is estimated that rail freight accounts for about 10 per cent of surface freight, but people don’t realise that even that delivers social and economic benefits worth £2.5 billion to the UK each year, much of that in former industrial heartlands.?

Moving goods by rail also benefits the environment, compared to our road running friends, producing around three-quarters less carbon per tonne of goods transported.?

With that in mind, at GBRTT we’ve launched a call for evidence which could help us transform the rail freight sector by collecting the information needed to show how and where moving more goods by rail can contribute even more.?

There has been a real step change in the focus on rail freight over the last few years. Whether that’s been its performance through COVID in keeping goods moving, or the HGV driver crisis, rail has been shown as a reliable alternative.

It won’t be easy, but the opportunity provided by reform; the establishment of Great British Railways and the creation of a new whole industry plan cannot be denied. People who know the benefits of rail freight have been very patient and are now looking to see how we can rise to the challenge of getting more freight on the rails.?

We have traditionally been a very passenger focused sector, which is not necessarily wrong, but has meant that decisions on the use of capacity have been skewed towards passenger trains. One of the ways to break down this boundary is by using economic analysis to inform decisions on the use of capacity.

Now halfway through its twelve weeks, the evidence gathering exercise will help us understand how much of the current and future demand for freight could be met by rail, how we can make it even more efficient and sustainable and how we can connect to new customers.

We want views and ideas from the widest possible range of stakeholders within and beyond rail and logistics on how to expand rail freight.

The call for evidence enables us not just to go out to the people who are familiar with rail freight, but to organisations that don’t use rail to look at why they don’t and what can be done to change that.

The barriers to entry for using rail are also complicated; it is a lot simpler to shift goods on a lorry but with rail it’s a more complex process requiring a delicate balance between passenger services and infrastructure requirements to even move the volumes we do. We are looking to demystify this process and make it simpler and easier for customers to use the railway to move their goods.

Initiatives like the Government’s Mode Shift Revenue Support scheme, which supports companies transporting goods by rail where road has a financial advantage, have been adapted in light of the disruption of recent rail strikes. This not only recognises the need to support rail freight in the short term through these difficult periods but also provides a modal shift incentive from road to rail.?

However, we also need to look at what the medium and long-term barriers to entry are and make it easier for businesses to make a commercial decision to use rail.

No alt text provided for this image

The Williams-Shapps Plan for Rail has highlighted that rail freight is a good thing and needs more of a focus. The creation of GBR gives us a huge amount of opportunity to do things better for freight.

What might we hear in our call for evidence? It could be anything from suggestions for additional links into different freight sites; sequential gauge clearance; using the capacity on the network differently; or benefits from the European Train Control System (ETCS) implementation. It will be a better understanding of the realistic volume of goods that can be transferred to rail; where the potential for future rail freight traffic exists and where new rail terminals could be needed. The end result will be a logistics system where rail and road can work together better for the benefit of businesses and customers.

I would encourage as many people as possible to get involved with the call for evidence. Once the evidence comes into us, we will use it alongside long-term forecasting to inform a range of rail freight growth options that will be put before the Secretary of State for consideration.

This is part of our work at GBRTT to create a simpler, better railway for everyone in Britain. We will get there by centring our railway around the needs and wants of the travelling public and freight users, reaching out and engaging directly with our stakeholders, as shown with this call for evidence.

The freight growth target call for evidence is now half-way through and will run until 27 September so please get your ideas to us now .?

Paul Bathgate

Co-Founder and CEO of RailX - 'Making Rail Freight Simple'

2 年

With an estimated 25% spare capacity on existing intermodal rail freight services there is an obvious solution to rapidly increase the volume of of freight on rail.

'H' (Dave Holladay)

Independent Transport Specialist

2 年

40 years ago I looked after an intermodal freight facility that delivered a 900% improvement in driver & tractor utilisation moving whisky from Speyside to Glasgow, and kept all drivers working local (never more than 25 miles from base, and always home at night) The big road haulage operators are already well into this - I travel overnight for many trips - often by road (as there are no convenient overnight trains) and in the past 15 years night time motorway traffic has dropped off a cliff edge. One big player now reckons that 80% of their ton miles is done on company trains, between company sidings, and no 40T HGV travels more then 40 miles to tip or lift a load I've just learned that a back-load traffic now uses the emptied supermarket curtainsider boxes to move processed timber products in the other direction, and having investigated a fatal crash where the economic pressures of loaded in to Cornwall but empty return lead to a raised risk for the operation. I see many places where modern smarter use of 'containers' is just waiting to be grasped Smarter loading & unloading can also eliminate the need for heavy axle load fork lifts, and use air suspension creatively, or even vessel ballast (or high/low tides) for barges

回复
Kevin Hancock

ECO-BEEHIVE is modern ethical beekeeping. Providing innovative solutions to your engineering challenges. Providing ESG SOLUTIONS

2 年

All the profit is going to EU companies. !! Fantastic and why. Because uk pollination s have all their assets in the eu and not the uk. So I propose the next referendum. REFERENDUM 100% no person in politics can hold any position or office. Elected or not unless they have 100% of their assets in England!

回复
Matthew Wood MRTPI

Strategic Sites and Garden Town Lead at Hertfordshire County Council

2 年

Look to opportunities for partnering with an MMC manufacturer and railfreighting Modern Methods of Construction MMC buildings - houses etc from factory to site. Carclaze in Cornwall- (Ponsandane Yard), Plymouth (Tavistock Yard), Exeter (Riverside) for Cranbrook and East of Exeter, Taunton (Fairwater Yard) - Garden Town, Harlow - Garden Town (Harlow Mill) Aylesbury - Garden Town and Bicester Garden Town are just some locations where Garden Town status or growth could provide markets.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了