The Future of Facebook
This is something I wrote back in 2012 based on a few articles, two in the Economist (2012, Leader: ‘A fistful of dollars’ and ‘Briefing - Floating Facebook: The Value of Friendship’) and one in the Daily Telegraph (3 March 2012, ‘The dark side of Facebook’ by I. Hollingshead and E. Barnett). The interesting point is the last one about network effects being applicable in reverse...
At the heart of Facebook’s success is surely a deep and longstanding human desire to connect with other human beings. People like Facebook because it makes finding new friends, or looking up old ones, easy. It’s also a fast and convenient way to stay in touch and share everything from party invitations to baby photos.
Facebook also knows an extraordinary amount about the minutiae of its users’ lives, which is why it targets advertising so effectively. The sheer number of Facebook users and the amount of time users spend on the site each day means Facebook is rapidly becoming the world’s de facto homepage.
But what might go wrong for Facebook in the future?
The first problem the company faces is operational: scaling up a small start-up into a giant corporation. Second is regulation, and this could be tricky. If Facebook continues to be successful it will, at some point, start to resemble a monopoly in the eyes of the US regulators and provoke an anti-trust case. It happened to Microsoft and it could easily happen to Google and/or Facebook.
The third problem is privacy. To date Facebook has been very clever about mapping the connections between people and what interests them and then selling this information to third parties. Much of the time Facebook users have little or no idea that this is happening and those that do know don’t seem to care. But this could change.
The network effects that made Facebook so large so fast could act in reverse if users start to feel exploited financially or no longer trust what is increasingly seen as a rather arrogant and potentially autistic company. But as the company grows larger, there will be inevitable tensions between attracting users and getting them to part with their data. The company’s devotion to online openness, or lack of privacy, may cause problems in the real world.
Global Head of Payments - Our payments validation tools and data intelligence enable organizations to reduce failed payments, mitigate fraud, improve stp rates and deliver a better overall customer experience.
6 年Never had one. Never will.
Author, speaker and philosopher posing as a futurist.
6 年and some more...the study from Princeton (Epidemiological modeling of online social network dynamics) that the Guardian article quotes: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.4208v1.pdf
Author, speaker and philosopher posing as a futurist.
6 年Found it! I knew there was a study a while ago comparing the decline of Facebook to that of the growth curve of an infectious disease. Here it is: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/22/facebook-princeton-researchers-infectious-disease
The other way to respond is to move away from a "FREE" model. I believe that if you pay to be on a site and provide data if you have paid then the data belongs to you and cannot be resold or harvested. Tim Berners Lee has been advocating a move to this for ages. Many Dating sites, The Connection Club recruitment site etc incorporated this type of process ages ago.
Founder & CEO, Change Management Group
6 年Don't you think that until we have a compelling substitute that addresses privacy concerns, it will be here to stay? The door is wide open to competitors (thinking of what became of Yahoo and aol).