The Future of the Energy Transition

By Les Mood & Shibashis (Shiba) Bhowmik on behalf of SineWatts

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…"—Dickens described an era of contradictions, and today’s energy landscape is no different.

The past few years have seen unprecedented growth in clean energy and transportation under the Biden administration—a historic surge in federal investment that accelerated the deployment of renewables, EVs, and grid infrastructure at a scale never seen before. Hundreds of billions of dollars fueled expansion across the energy sector, reshaping power markets, accelerating manufacturing, and pushing EV adoption into the mainstream.

Now, the landscape is shifting. Federal funding is slowing. Policy support is under fire. Regulatory reversals are adding uncertainty. And despite all the progress, energy costs are skyrocketing, the grid remains fragile, and foundational design flaws have not been addressed.

The clean energy movement is at a crossroads. The easy money is gone. What happens next will determine whether this transition was just a short-term boom—or the foundation of a truly sustainable energy future.

Resilience Over Reliance

The last wave of growth leaned heavily on government backing, incentives, and policy mandates. That was necessary to scale, but it was never a long-term strategy. Now that the funding surge is slowing, the weaknesses in the system are obvious:

• Electricity rates are skyrocketing. California’s energy costs have increased three to four times faster than the national average, largely due to grid expansion driven by inefficiencies rather than necessity.
• EV adoption is exposing grid weaknesses. The assumption that utilities can simply “scale up” to meet demand is proving false—high-power loads, infrastructure strain, and increasing costs for all ratepayers are forcing hard questions.
• Deployment has outpaced structural reform. Rapid expansion was the priority, but much of it was built on the old model, failing to address core inefficiencies. The money fueled growth, but it didn’t fix the foundation.

Now comes the real challenge: shifting from reliance to resilience—not just to survive political shifts, but to build an energy system that functions independently of them.

What Needs to Happen Next

The next phase of energy innovation isn’t about doing more of the same. It’s about fixing what doesn’t work. That means:

1. The Grid Must Shift from Expansion to Optimization

The traditional grid model is failing under its own weight. More generation is being added, yet rates keep rising. More transmission is being built or upgraded, yet reliability isn’t improving. The reason? The centralized grid wasn’t designed for today’s energy landscape.

What’s needed? A new grid paradigm that is more flexible and responsive to demand.

• Stop overbuilding rigid bulk power generation—focus on flexible generation and storage.
• Redesign electricity pricing to reward efficiency and flexible demand rather than just adding capacity.
• Reduce the overall cost of renewables—Instead of forcing expensive upgrades by incentives, focus on innovations around flexible energy storage and load management.

2. EVs Must Be an Asset, Not a Liability

Right now, the assumption is that EV adoption will scale up, and the grid will just adjust. But that’s already proving to be a flawed model. Without redesign, EV charging infrastructure will drive massive, unnecessary costs onto ratepayers.

3. Stop Overloading the Grid with Inefficient Renewables

The approach of simply deploying more solar and wind, without fixing how they operate on the grid, is backfiring. We’re seeing rising costs, curtailment, and a system struggling under its own inefficiencies.

What’s needed? Smarter generation and distribution.

• Flexible distributed energy must replace centralized overbuild.
• Flexible storage must be a core design principle, not an afterthought.

4. Fix the Cost Burden of Electrification

Electrification is being sold as a win for everyone, but the way it's being implemented is pushing costs onto those who can least afford it. Rate structures are penalizing non-adopters, while incentives are disproportionately benefiting wealthier participants.

What’s needed? A financial model that ensures electrification is cost-effective for all.

• Electricity rates must reflect real system costs. The current model of cost-shifting to ratepayers to fund grid expansion is unsustainable.
• Innovation-driven solutions must replace subsidy-driven expansion. The transition cannot survive if it depends on indefinite government support.

A Hard Reset, Not a Slow Decline

Clean energy has spent the past decade expanding rapidly, but now it faces a choice:

1. Keep following the same path—relying on temporary funding, shifting policies, and hoping the next administration restores financial support.
2. Reset the system—rebuilding energy markets around resilience, efficiency, and true cost-effectiveness.

This transition was never supposed to be about just keeping the lights on. It was about building a system that is abundant, accessible, and affordable and ultimately, clean and reliable. That vision is still possible—but only if the industry stops waiting for the next round of subsidies and starts creating the next generation of solutions.

The opportunity for real transformation is here. The only question is: who’s ready to move?

For more on the energy transformation, follow Shibashis (Shiba) Bhowmik , Les Mood and SineWatts .

?