The Future of Construction
Jim Rogers
Teaching construction professionals to integrate safety, quality, and productivity with over 2 million on-line learners
One of the most common questions I receive during my contact with construction industry professionals throughout the world is,
“What is the future of the construction industry?”
It’s an interesting question, and the future is obviously hard to predict, but given the current state of things, here are my thoughts on the future of the industry:?
We have a labor problem
We have a skills gap
We have an image issue
This is the state of the industry today. Left unchecked, this will be the state of the industry well into the future. It doesn’t have to be this way. We can change, but we will need to take affirmative steps to have an impact.?
I often hear about construction technology as a disrupter to the industry status quo, and, in fact,?I often talk about the benefits of adopting technology in the industry. However, I actually believe that the adoption of technology within the industry presents both an opportunity and a new threat.
The opportunity is clear…
Reinvent our image and presence into one that is much less caveman like by embracing technology to benefit people and improve our industry’s contributions to the built environment. This has a positive affect on the issues I listed above by helping to attract more young people into our industry. It also helps us attract a more diverse workforce, giving us a much larger pool of talent to pull from. Making the industry more attractive to women essentially doubles the size of the talent pool.?
The threat is…
How do we do this without alienating our current workforce?
This threat cannot be overlooked. Our current workforce carries with it a tremendous amount of knowledge about how we build. This knowledge is not well documented, and it is not handed down well. This is knowledge that comes from years of hands-on experience that is not always easy to transfer through a classroom setting. If we alienate the people who currently hold that knowledge, we risk creating a huge rift in the industry that may have a negative impact on things like safety, quality, and productivity; the very things we need to improve.?
If there is any question about the reality of alienating the current workforce, check out?Mike Rowe’s recent comments citing the alarming number of men who have already decided to punch out of the workforce. The demographic being cited is precisely the demographic we cannot afford to lose in the construction industry. It includes precisely the people I am talking about. The ones who have been building our structures and facilities for the last 10 to 20 years. The ones who essentially hold the keys to the knowledge we cannot afford to lose.?
So How Does this Tie to Technology?
When I conduct classes or workshops, I almost always hear the opinion that the “old timers” are the roadblock to the adoption of technology, and I don’t disagree with this basic premise. However, I don’t believe that we can, or should, just push through the roadblock. Doing so may create a much larger problem than it solves, and if we don’t make changes to our approach soon, that’s exactly what we are going to do.?
The current thrust of technology onto our current workforce is poised to go one of two ways:
These are both big loosing scenarios. We are already experiencing a labor shortage that spans across the industry, from drivers and operators, to skilled trades, construction managers, and field engineers. We cannot afford to alienate our experienced workforce before we pass on knowledge and skills to a larger incoming generation of construction industry professionals. We also cannot afford to continue with the status quo of delivering projects behind schedule and over budget.?
Technology is poised to help us improve in many areas:?
All these things are critically important to move the needle on safety, quality, and productivity in construction. Remember, we haven’t seen gains in?construction productivity?in decades – technology is either going to help us improve that, or it is going to make it drop even further because it pushes out the people in our industry who carry key knowledge. We need the buy in and support of the current workforce in order to more rapidly adopt technology and to attract new workers to our industry. If we get their support, we adopt tech at a more rapid pace. This improves the industry, and our image, and we attract more workers who can learn from the “old timers” before they leave
How do we do that?
We need to change the way we treat people in this industry. We need to acknowledge what is pushing them out, and get it all changed. We need to improve the respect we?show?for these people in the field, at our project sites.?
Bringing in younger workers and showing them more attention will also push them over the edge
It starts with voicing the situation to them and implementing a culture shift
First, we need to start communicating how important it is that we get the current workforce to adopt some of the changes and the technology that we are trying to implement. We need to appeal to them by explaining that we are trying to incorporate tech not only for the sake of improving our bottom line, or improving data analytics, or reducing rework, or improving productivity (they are tired of hearing all this). We need them to understand that we are trying to make?their?lives better. We need to stress how important it is for?them, the people who really know how to build, to adopt this technology because we are going to be dependent on them to adopt it correctly. We need to communicate that we are adopting technology to reduce the number of hours they work, and that we want them to reclaim those hours for themselves, not spend those hours on something else at the job site. We need to shift the narrative to explain that we are trying to make their lives better.
Second, we need to immediately improve the way we train and educate our existing workforce on what it is we are trying to do. They need better resources. Making them come in and spend more hours in poorly executed training programs does not work. On-line and on-demand training should be adopted – it gives them a venue to learn on their own, without others around to judge them.?
Third, we need to encourage and develop mentorship. Mentorship creates a formal partnership between new and old to begin transferring knowledge. It creates immediate value and recognition of the people who have built this industry. It also creates a two-way transfer of knowledge where the new worker is helping the existing worker with technology.
If these three things are not done soon, the workforce of older individuals who hold many of the keys to knowledge in our industry will continue to leave and may leave at an increasing pace. If this happens, no amount of technology will replace their absence.?
What are your thoughts on technology in?#construction? Share your experience (good or bad) in the comments below. We need to start learning from each other.
There are many more in the construction industry that need to hear this message! Please share this newsletter with your network, and subscribe to the newsletter so you don’t miss future discussions.
Things You May Have Missed
Keep Up with the Conversation
Here are some additional ways to access more tips and advice for professionals in the?#aec?industries (#Architecture,?#Engineering,?#Construction):
--
2 年One problem , I believe is hurting things is exactly what is on topic. The 10-20 year veterans or either old school or thought by old school. Making my generation at 39 years old the new old school. And I’m pretty tec oriented for the most part. I just believe in hands on showing and teaching. And weather you have knowledge beyond your age or not. Most well paying companies want degrees and if you have the 10-20 plus years of hands on you usually didn’t have time to get those. Our degree was paid for and erned by mistakes , mostly costly mistakes. Lol. Point being bringing all these leaders together is the only way to fix it. Hints the tricks of the trade. Lol. Also experience is Definitely key. And sadly theres not enough of the honest , hard core, old school , quality not quantity, kinda leaders left out there. But definitely love the topic.
United Trinity Investment Group, offering Healthcare Staffing and IT Services.
2 年In 2016 I showed up on construction site as a carpenter apprentice,...the older crew didn't want to show me much,...The company was attempting to bring technology through using tablets onsite instead of blueprints getting wet and muddy,...and the same older folks didn't want to learn to use those either. No judgement or debate, just saying what I experienced. I left the Union in 2017, now I'm IT certified, and trying to learn the ropes to become a developer strongly leaning towards modular/volumetric construction of MFH and commercial. Thanks for the invite to this newsletter.
Buyer TG&S in SABIC
2 年You might apply this article not only to construction industry but to other industries and sectors. Very interesting.
PhD Candidate @ UCL | Researching Vocational Education in Construction
2 年Jim Rogers Two things jumped out at me. You highlighted “knowledge that comes from years of hands-on experience... not always easy to transfer through a classroom setting” I’m reminded of a model by Ikujiro Nonaka, developed in 1990, that explains how tacit and explicit knowledge are converted into organizational knowledge. In part, it's the process of sharing knowledge by observation, imitation, and practice through apprenticeship. You also mention on-line and on-demand training. A great example of why this is necessary is from a Vice News special on the future of work and how automation and artificial intelligence will disrupt the workforce. They interviewed Landon Cofer, a Toyota Team Member representing the automotive industry (not the trades but facing similar challenges), who offered his view of his reskilling opportunities, “[d]epending on the circumstances, that could be very hard because if you work a full shift, and you have a family, you may only have an hour or two of free time a day. Are you supposed to drive to a training facility and spend a few hours a day there before you go to your shift? I don't think very many people would do that.” If any of your readers what more information, I'd be happy to share.
Assistant Safety Manager
2 年Very well written article speaking many truths!