Future Changes We Can Choose
Taiwan and shipping boats from space, courtesy of NASA.

Future Changes We Can Choose

As I write this post, I'm 37,900 feet above the Pacific Ocean on a flight from San Francisco bound for Taipei, Taiwan. Over the next two weeks I'll be meeting with high-level Taiwanese industry and government leaders to hear their views re: the regional impact of the Internet of Everything.

Our world is rapidly changing, and the now-present reality that I can email, tweet, and create a blog post while on a Trans-Pacific flight was something not possible 5 years ago. Exponential changes like the era we're in offer great opportunities for society -- as well as great challenges.

Imagine what the next 5 years will bring: The term "mobile computing" will eventually become a dated term, replaced by "ubiquitous computing" as the internet will be everywhere. These changes include the transportation we take on land, in the air, and at sea; the clothes and devices we wear, sensors at work, at home, in our environment, and (if we chose) in us for medical purposes as well.

Also right behind and coupled with the Internet of Everything: 3D mass fabricators enabling individuals to affordably "print" and modify at the molecular level tangible substances based on digital designs. Maker Faires around the world already exist showcasing the early stages of what 3D fabricators can do in the hands of artists, engineers, and hobbyists.

Technology itself is amoral, how we humans chose to employ technology determines outcomes. Individuals are gaining capabilities the previously required significant resources limited only to large corporations or nation-states. What does that mean for our global future?

When considering the future, all too often we focus on what the technology *can do* and miss chances to think now about what future changes *we can chose* in how we organize, how we work together, and how we are a society together that also may need to occur to best ensure the advances of the Internet of Everything offer benefits to the greatest number of people. Social policies usually try and play catch-up with technologies, yet in a period of exponential change -- is "catching-up" sufficient or do we need a large transformation to "leap frog" ahead?

These strategic questions are why I'm on an Eisenhower Fellowship to Taiwan for two weeks and then to Australia for three weeks to ask the same questions of their leadership. During the trip I'll seek to understand different perspectives on the transformative impacts of the “Internet of Everything”, to include the sectors of customer/citizen engagement, healthcare, "just in time" manufacturing, and delivery of services. How will increasingly ubiquitous internet impact global e-commerce, cybersecurity, and cybercrime-related issues?

I should stress this trip is solely in a personal capacity, and my views during this trip are my own -- though I hope to benefit from exchanging many different and diverse perspectives with others. For the trip, I'm re-activating my old blog from my PhD+post-doc days at https://blog.dbray.org and also will post to LinkedIn.

For now, one more closing thought: throughout my career, I often have found that a diverse group of people and industries contribute to creating public value. This diversity includes internet and technology investment groups, policy think tanks, government officials involved with national strategies, experts in cyber defense and preventing cybercrime, and business leaders paving the way for the internet technologies of the future.

No one person has all the answers, however collectively we can think, reflect, and help shape the future before it impacts us all.

This is the reason why I'm blogging: ideas, insights, and comments welcomed throughout the trip -- please send yours along. Thank you in advance!

With highest regards,

-d.

Kiat Neo

Sr. Manager/Enterprise Architect at GDIT

10 年

Never been to Taiwan but I heard great things in Taiwan from food to technologies. As I can recall we used to think of Taiwan in respect to the world of manufacturing - remember the Made in Taiwan term. Now that we see Made in China everywhere, so what happen to Taiwan and its future? The future to me is how fast you can introduce technologies to the people, especially the younger generation and how people adopt the changes including learning to use mobile/wearable devices. I think it will be worthy to look at how technology is used in elementary schools and so on, Internet is just a mean to provide that bridge, though having a low cost and free broadband make a great difference.

回复
Ann-Marie Johnson

VP, Federal Market Engagement | ACT IAC Executive Committee | ACT IAC Fellow | Chief Member

10 年

Great post, critical work you are undertaking. Advanced technology, implemented thoughtfully, should enhance freedom and sustainable prosperity (i.e., financial, environmental, and especially human benefit) for both individuals and society. I eagerly await your future posts!

David Bray, PhD

Principal, CEO, Global Keynoter | Named One of "24 Americans Changing the World" by Business Insider | Leader of Transformative Change in Turbulent Environments Involving People, Tech, & Data

10 年

Agreed Alex, and a similar conversation came up in Taipei yesterday. They too asked if the U.S. had any initiatives to educate individuals re: the ethics associated with what technology could do, both with regards to the individual and to communities. They were concerned that the rate of technology change was accelerating and that most individuals were not asking "what am I giving up in return for using this technology" or "how can we design the use of this technology better, so we don't necessarily give up privacy or security of our data?" Interesting questions and challenges for our near-future ahead.

回复
Alex Duzan

Sr. Manager Information Security at U.S. Bank

10 年

David, that is the million dollar question. How to impact change broadly in a way that addresses the present and prepares for the future? It must be a grass roots effort that begins where people are. Educational institutions need to embrace the need to teach people well-founded standards of right and wrong. Ethics courses should be included in every degree program (technology, communications, etc). The cultural taboo of right vs wrong should be broached. Ultimately .... parents need to teach their children. Just some random thoughts.

Obviously we can print cash today. Will 3D printing change the face of currency by embedding chips into coins?

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

David Bray, PhD的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了