Furlough Pay

Furlough Pay

Is an employer required to use the formula set out in the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) to calculate the amount of furlough pay owing to an employee even though they had reached an alternative agreement as to the calculation of such pay?

No, held the EAT in?Mones v Lisa Franklin Limited.

The Claimant was furloughed during the pandemic. She received a letter setting out the terms of her furlough, including pay. The Claimant’s furlough pay was then calculated and paid in accordance with the terms set out in the letter. This resulted in a lower payment than if her pay had been calculated in accordance with the formula set out in the CJRS. The Claimant claimed the difference by way of an unlawful deduction from wages claim. The EAT found that there had been no unlawful deduction.

The EAT held that the CJRS detailed the obligations between employers and HMRC. It didn’t create any statutory or contractual obligation between the employer and its employee requiring it to calculate furlough payments in a certain way. In this case there was an express contractual agreement reached between the employer and the employee as to furlough pay. This set out the Claimant’s entitlement. The CJRS did not cut across that and impose any higher obligation.

Interestingly, the EAT noted that the position may have been different if there had been no written agreement covering furlough pay. In those circumstances, there may have been an argument that there was an implied term that the employer would calculate furlough pay in accordance with the formula set out in the CJRS.

No alt text provided for this image

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Daniel Barnett的更多文章

  • Compensation

    Compensation

    Summary: Tribunal erred in reducing discrimination compensation by 80% based on the chance that the Claimant might have…

    1 条评论
  • ERB: Zero hours contracts

    ERB: Zero hours contracts

    Summary: Government to amend Employment Rights Bill to include framework for application of zero hours contracts…

    5 条评论
  • Unfair dismissal: SOSR

    Unfair dismissal: SOSR

    Summary: Dismissal based on a genuine but erroneous belief that the Claimant had resigned should have been considered…

    1 条评论
  • Employment Tribunals

    Employment Tribunals

    Summary: New ET rules of procedure in force from 6 January 2025 From 6 January 2025, employment law practitioners will…

    3 条评论
  • Unfair dismissal: SOSR

    Unfair dismissal: SOSR

    Summary: Length of service and alternatives to dismissal not relevant factors where dismissal was due to irretrievable…

    2 条评论
  • Holiday Pay

    Holiday Pay

    Summary: Gap of over three months between deductions did not break chain in holiday pay claim In Deksne v Ambitions…

  • Maternity Protection

    Maternity Protection

    Summary: Suitable Alternative Employment In Hunter v Carnival plc the Employment Appeal Tribunal looked at the…

    2 条评论
  • Employment Appeal Tribunal

    Employment Appeal Tribunal

    Summary: EAT issues new Practice Direction to accompany new Rules The Employment Appeal Tribunal has published a new…

  • Whistleblowing detriment

    Whistleblowing detriment

    Summary: Disclosures made before employment begins can qualify as protected In MacLennan v British Psychological…

    1 条评论
  • Employment Rights Bill: consultation on remedies for collective redundancy and fire and rehire

    Employment Rights Bill: consultation on remedies for collective redundancy and fire and rehire

    Summary: Government launches consultation seeking views on strengthening remedies against abuse of rules on collective…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了