WHAT A PLOY OF MARYAM NAWAZ? USING LEFTIST MEDIA:TWIST LAWS/ BLIND JUSTICE, ENSURE ERASING OF CASES,CLAIM INNOCENCE IN PRESS, SUE, ARREST&KILL I.KHAN
Col (R) Hassan Yousuf
Trainer Futurology, Smart Management & IT / Digi Tech at Pakistan Institute of Management
A. Some decade ago, no one talked about tail risk hedge funds, which were a miniature forte of the Pakistan market. However, today many people are cautious of malpractices, corruption & white color crimes. In the same context the most corrupt politician in world history Mian Nawaz Sharif was grilled in Pakistan, as a direct result of the Supreme Court ruling, he was declare invalid to remain PM Pakistan & all decisions issued by former PM Nawaz Sharif as the party chief, including all the tickets awarded?to candidates for the Senate elections, were declared null and void. Nawaz Sharif has already served as Pakistan’s prime minister twice, once from 1990 to 1993, and from 1997 to 1999. He was removed from power both times, in 1999 by a military coup and 1993 by presidential order.
1.??Nawaz Sharif is one of the richest people in Pakistan. His publicly disclosed net worth is 1.6 billion Pakistani rupees ($15 million), but his actual net worth is estimated to be hundreds of millions of dollars. Sharif and his family own multiple real estate properties, factories, sugar mills, rice mills, and flour mills in Pakistan and abroad.
2.??Sharif was at the heart of the?Panama Papers leak. He had funneled money abroad through illicit means to evade taxes.Yes, that’s what an office-holding prime minister was doing before being ousted from PM office. Fox News Point claims that Sharif was also involved in a metro bus service scam.
3.??The?Panamagate case, officially titled?Imran Khan Niazi v. Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, was heard between 1 November 2016 and 23 February 2017. The Supreme Court of Pakistan disqualified him from holding the PM’s office for life.
4.??In what has become one?of the shortest?verdicts in Pakistan’s history, the Supreme Court directly struck down Section 203 of the Election Act. Section 203 allowed disqualified parliamentarians to be elected as party leaders.?According to a statement given by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Nawaz Sharif’s verdict will be effective from July 28, 2017, after his disqualification as a member of the National Assembly. The Supreme Court’s ruling is quite interesting. In the past Nawaz Sharif found himself at the center of the Panama gate controversy and felt that his position as the prime minister of Pakistan was?under threat.
5.??The Joint Investigation Team (JIT) that investigated the massive corruption scandal found “glaring disparities” between the Sharif family’s known sources of income and their actual wealth.
6.??Even though Nawaz Sharif was disqualified as the prime minister of Pakistan, his party PML-N was still in power.
7.??Despite all the controversy, the ruling party amended Pakistan’s constitution to allow Sharif to retain his position as the chief of the PML-N.
8.??Previously, someone disqualified from holding a public office was also barred from leading a political party.
9.??But the modified Elections Act 2017 presumably allowed Sharif to remain the head of the PML-N. Now that the Supreme Court has disqualified him from leading his own party, he is?seeking public empathy.
领英推荐
10.?????Nawaz Sharif has served as the prime minister of Pakistan three times, but he has never been able to complete his term.
11.??In 1993, he was removed from power by presidential order. In 1999, he was ousted in a military coup. And in 2017, the Supreme Court disqualified him from holding a public office.
12.??It is clear that the PML-N under the pressure from Nawaz Sharif has committed a big blunder by invoking the Anti-Terrorism Act against Mr Imran Khan and provided his campaign with yet another boost. The last thing the government needs while battling a crisis of legitimacy at home is the international community also turning against it.
13.??On 17/18 September anti-terrorism court, quashed terrorism charges against Imran khan his defense lawyers said, a relief for former PM who has faced a spate of legal woes since being ousted from office. The court said Mr Khan's alleged offence didn't attract terrorism charges, said Faisal Chaudhry, one of his lawyers. “This is actually an order to quash the charges,” another of his lawyers, Babar Awan, said. “It only proves that these are trumped up charges, and just a tool for political victimization.”
14.??Another case involves foreign funding for his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party that an election tribunal found unlawful.
15.??Following the Supreme Court verdict, Nawaz Sharif has said that his removal from office was part of a political conspiracy against him, and has started to wage a war of words against the judiciary in the recent weeks. The former premier has faced several cases since his ousting in April after a vote of confidence won by opposition parties in an effort led by his successor, prime minister Shabazz Sharif.
16. One of the cases is at a crucial stage in the high court, which is slated to indict Mr Khan on September 22 in a contempt of court case for threatening the judicial officer. The September 30 arrest warrant relates to remarks Mr Khan made regarding a judge and senior police officials during a public rally on August 20.
17.The warrant was issued soon after Maryam Nawaz, a deposed leader of the Pakistan Muslim League (N), held a press conference in which she called for a raid on Mr Khan’s residence to recover a missing copy of a diplomatic cypher that carried details of purported US threats to his government.
?B.?Pakistanis were jolted upside down on Saturday evening 01 October 2022, feeling whiplashed by a pseudo revolution headed by Maryam Nawaz in the wake of already mushrooming political crisis that had barely been averted. While relieved at the peaceful ending to a chaotic struggle over removing their most loved PM Imran Khan, they are also bracing for more partisan confrontation and economic free fall Pakistan's Prime Minister Imran Khan was ousted April 10 by a vote of no confidence in Parliament. The humiliating but legal ouster of Prime Minister Imran Khan, 72, by a vote of no confidence in Parliament abruptly ended the rule of a towering but flawed figure.
C?.Though Khan had championed change and reform but could hardly deliver them due to serious confrontation from the opposition, he then resorted to anti-American accusations in an eleventh-hour effort to avoid defeat. Khan rose to national leadership on promises that he would tackle the power and corruption of Pakistan’s wealthy political elites, a theme that drew strong support for his election in 2018 from younger, educated and middle-class Pakistanis.
D .That support was still evident, whenever Khan, the charismatic former captain of Pakistan’s national cricket team, had called for rallies after he was removed from office. Enthusiastic crowds had gathered in three major cities Lahore, Rawalpindi and Karachi and smaller ones across the country. Televised footage showed thousands of people mingling in city plazas, dancing, clapping and chanting, “Who will save Pakistan? Imran Khan, Imran Khan. “Never have such crowds come out so spontaneously and in such numbers in our history, rejecting the imported govt led by crooks,” he tweeted after midnight. Yet to an extent, Khan’s relentless attacks on elites backfired by bringing a hodgepodge of rival parties together to seek his removal.
E.?By wooing disgruntled Khan allies, his opponents mustered enough votes in parliament to bring him down. Imran Khan needs to be given credit for defeating the dynastic political forces,”Khan has also made it clear he wants to seek office again. Some observers suggested that while his weak traits impatience, poor management skills and unwillingness to cultivate allies undercut his ability to govern, he has always been at the top of his game when challenging power from the outside as a persuasive and passionate speaker .Khan’s downfall will continue to haunt the new government,” said Hasan Askari Rizvi, a political analyst in Lahore. “Ousting and replacing a leader is one thing. Successful governance is another. There are hard times ahead for Sharif.” Said Ayaz Amir, an analyst and former legislator, a reference to the two families the Sharifs and the Bhutto’s who have wielded political power in Pakistan since its founding in 1947. Now, he said, they will have to share power with the unwieldy array of former foes who have “nothing in common but opposition to Khan. It will be very difficult for them to take on these economic problems.” We really are apprehensive?