Fundraising? Maybe Not Now. Build Your Positive Cash Flow Story Instead.
The Ember Co.
We draw on our thoughtfully cultivated network to link companies with crucial expertise, talent and capital
Many founders just assume without hesitation that they need to raise capital and they need to do so from certain types of investors (angels, VC’s, family offices, alternative lenders, etc). Although this is the case for many companies that require more internal development before generating revenue, there are other business models, particularly those that produce physical products, that have the potential to bootstrap for longer to the point where raising capital becomes a “nice to” instead of a “have to.” Examples include Dell, Patagonia, Tuft & Needle and Wayfair. When this happens, fundraising becomes a process controlled by the founders versus investors and presents the opportunity to optimize capital structure early on, which makes the business even more attractive for future sale or investment. This also allows companies to tell a positive cash flow story that sets them apart from others when they do end up speaking to investors and to help potentially avoid the constant fundraising treadmill all together.
?
Before convincing yourself you have to raise capital now (or while you are trying), try to incorporate a few of these, often overlooked, tips from Ember’s own portfolio as well as companies that have said “No” to us because they didn’t need the cash. Much of this activity happens in the background and may seem trivial and tedious, but the processes have proven to reveal cash flow opportunities that have helped companies avoid having to raise additional money or even saved them from insolvency.
?
Meticulous Cash Flow Planning
Goal: Have a clear picture of your cash position everyday
Negotiate Hard
Goal: Get paid before paying
领英推荐
Find Potential Working Capital Partners Just In Case
Goal: Have cash available when needed and generate a return on every dollar
An Illustration
Below is the cash position of two different companies with the same revenue and expense dollars over 9 months:??
The only difference is the terms offered by suppliers:
The?Company with Terms has $200K of more cash at the end of nine months?vs. the Company with no Terms!?So, we advise many of our companies to simplify their focus:?optimize unit economics, manage marketing spend carefully and create a proactive cash flow strategy as long as possible by accounting for the timing of payments.
Community Organizer - Creative Collaborator - Placemaking Strategist
1 年Hybrid model! I took a class with Ashoka on this and it was incredibly helpful. While I agree with all of it, sometimes using a 501c3/LLC model can cloud the vision of the 501c3. I saw that when both entities were performing services, not selling goods. When COVID shut down the LLCs revenue, the 501c3 flourished. Now that our LLC is no longer active, I see more communities coming together to support our intentional vision and clarify our end goal.