Funding Female Entrepreneurs: Gender is an Additional Requirement!
So much has been said about the "Gender Funding Gap" globally and Africa is not exempted from these conversations. There have been arguments about why there is indeed such a massive gap - this is a topic for another day. Because of this gap though, when investors back 1 female founder, they tend to make their publicity about the gender as though that is all it takes to raise money from them. Well, the purpose of this article is to address that misconception!
When it comes to investing in a business, the gender of the founder or CEO is typically not the most important factor investors to consider. Instead, investors focus on the viability and potential of the business itself.
First and foremost, investors want to see good quality business plans that outlines the company's goals, strategies, and projections for growth and profitability. They want to see a clear understanding of the target market and a strong value proposition that sets the business apart from its competitors. Investors love large market opportunities. They love industry/category leaders.
In addition, investors also pay attention to the management team and the skills and experience they bring to the table. They want to see domain expertise. They want to see a team that is well-rounded, with diverse backgrounds and skill sets, and one that has a proven track record of success.
Another important factor is the industry and market conditions. Investors want to see that the business is operating in a growing market with strong demand for its products or services. They also want to see that the company has a competitive advantage and is well-positioned to capitalize on the market opportunity.
All of these factors are considered before any gender-specific ones. While it's true that the number of female entrepreneurs and business leaders is still relatively low, investors are typically more interested in the business itself, rather than the gender of the person running it.
However, it is worth noting that when an investor decides to fund a female founder, they may make the PR look like it was all about gender, but in actual sense, it is about the business first. Making the investment about the gender of the founder helps the investors access more funding, as they are funding "underrepresented founders". So it makes many feel good about themselves and more importantly helps them access more money. And this is true irrespective of the gender of the investor as well. The point is that investors want to see that their money is going to a business that has the potential to be successful, regardless of the gender of the person running it.
领英推荐
I know there have been calls for more female fund managers in a bid to help drive investment into female founded startups. We have also started to see the rise of more Gender Lens investors. Guess what, the dynamics remain the same! You have to meet the typical business requirements that many investors will require, and then add the gender lens to it. It is never gender lens alone. If you doubt me, look at the website of your favorite gender lens investors and check if they have ever or intend to give anyone money solely because of their gender. In essence, gender is an additional requirement for funding not the primary and definitely not the only.
In Africa, there are many female-led startups that are making a significant impact in their respective industries. Some examples include:
If you know any of these founders, call them to ask about the role their Gender played in the funding they got. Ask them if they felt that the investors let them off the hook on key business and operational concerns just because they are female. Ask them how easy the capital raising process was on them, then compare their responses to the Techcrunch article you read.
All of these companies were founded and are led by women, some of these women pioneered the industry, and I dare say that the gender of the CEO is an addendum. Some of these companies (and many more) have found success and have grown rapidly by providing innovative solutions and services to the market they operate in. The founders had a clear understanding of the target market and a strong value proposition that sets the business apart from its competitors. The companies have solid business plans, and strong management teams, and are operating in growing markets with strong demand for their products or services.
Gender is not a major factor in their success, but the fact that they are led by women is a positive indication of the increasing number of female entrepreneurs and business leaders in Africa. Looking forward to seeing more.
Happy entrepreneuring
Unlocking the value in Nigeria's fruit value chain by building an end-to-end fruit processing company
2 年I'm glad the romanticism around "women owned" is shifting so that more objective discussion about founding and running a business, especially in these parts.
Founder, MoneyAfrica & Ladda | Fintech | Edtech | World Economic Forum Young Global Leader | Linked In Top Voices Finance & Economy 2020 | Mandela Washington Fellowship | Financial literacy expert
2 年It is what it is She’s the leader in that space.
Venture Builder | Early-Stage Startup Investor | 2x Exited Founder | Scaling Startups, Driving Exits & Ecosystem Growth | FinTech, EdTech, AgTech, PropTech, SaaS Expert | Venture Capital Associate | Impact Investing
2 年I have always thought that spotlighting ONLY the gender of founders like Affiong in most articles instead of her business acumen water down her expertise and ingenuity. It’s more or less like the “beauty and brain” slang used to qualify many women of success. The media is only ruining the narrative in two ways; 1. many people “may” not put in as much work thinking their gender is more than enough to get them through the gender due to the inclusiveness bubble. 2. It becomes harder to track all the other invaluable contributions, processes and resources put into enabling these female geniuses. This does more harm as the women are recognized as token rather than the star they are. You’ll notice this in who gets invited to talk about entrepreneurship, business etc while they are reserved for topics like women in tech, female founders summit etc. I would like to see a different case where these women are not recognized as tokens to represent the “female inclusiveness bias” but as thought-leaders that they are. The media needs to stop over-sensationalizing the gender situation and celebrate our amazons as the stars that they are just like they keep re-echoing men that are not even doing as much as their female counterparts.