“... full of sound and fury; signifying nothing."?

“... full of sound and fury; signifying nothing."

(Apologies to William Shakespeare.)

Revenue operations and sales management go to a lot of trouble to create performance metrics. But beware of a large quantity of slick graphics that don’t tell you much. They can mislead and distract you from what really matters.

Ask yourself, do these metrics help you sell more? Forecast better? Plan better?

Here’s a great example. A B2B seller measured their success in new customer acquisitions (“new logos”). Because they had such a long sales cycle, they wanted a signal to tell them if their future sales were looking up. So, they tracked new logo potential by classifying “open opportunities” as either active or engaged. Active meant that the prospect was evaluating the company’s solution. Engaged meant that they were considering evaluating their solution.

They had a beautiful report indicating how the number of active and engaged prospects were trending. The chart looked something like this.

No alt text provided for this image

The engaged and active opportunities are up and to the right. Someone later decided to add actuals to the chart. And to make this a fair comparison, the actuals on each date show the number of new logos acquired in the subsequent year (about two sales cycles for them) from the list of active and engaged opportunities on each date. New logos were flatlining. Hmm.

Were either of these trends a meaningful signal about future new logo acquisitions? Where is the signal? Did these charts help the company sell more? Forecast better? Plan better? No. They did however take up a lot of time in preparing them and got significant attention in board meetings.

In this case not only was this report a low information-content signal to predict future sales, until someone bothered to add actuals to the chart it was misleading management to believe that things were rosier than they were.

So, beware of slick graphics of meaningless metrics. The slicker they are and the more you see, the more skeptical you should be. They may not tell you much, they can mislead, and distract you from what really matters.


#salesmanagement?#salesleadership?#salesenablement?#salesoperations #revops?#revenueoperations?#salesops?#analytics?#sales

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Bill Kantor的更多文章

  • Revenue Platform Groupthink Has Lost the Plot

    Revenue Platform Groupthink Has Lost the Plot

    Of AI, BI, and UIs Choices are great for customers. Almost every week I uncover another new “revenue platform”…

  • Win Rate = Won over (won + lost) is Not What You Think it is

    Win Rate = Won over (won + lost) is Not What You Think it is

    Won over (won + lost), aka the "WOWPL" (won over won plus lost) formula: a bad estimate of something you don't want…

  • The Three Sales Musketeers: Sales Knobs and Win Rate Woes

    The Three Sales Musketeers: Sales Knobs and Win Rate Woes

    Our articles “A Tale of Three Knobs” and “Great Win Rate Expectations” discuss flaws in the ways businesses measure win…

  • The Magic of Parsimonious Models

    The Magic of Parsimonious Models

    "Garbage in, garbage out. How can you make great forecasts with bad data?” You can't.

    1 条评论
  • Luck or talent

    Luck or talent

    Successful in business? How much did luck, or lack thereof, play in your situation? One of my mentors long ago made a…

  • Great Win Rate Expectations

    Great Win Rate Expectations

    How not to Estimate Win Rates: "Won/(Won+Lost)" What if I asked you: Among all deals that closed last quarter and were…

    6 条评论
  • A Tale of Three Knobs

    A Tale of Three Knobs

    Your sales process is defined by three independent factors: deal size, generation rate, and win rate. Want to grow…

    8 条评论
  • Dashboard alert fatigue

    Dashboard alert fatigue

    A 2016 study published in the National Library of Medicine investigated fatigue in relation to clinical alarms in the…

社区洞察