Introduction
Before Single Page Applications (SPAs), web applications were typically multi-page. This meant that each interaction with the application triggered the server to send a complete new page to the browser, resulting in a full page reload. This process often led to slower performance and a less fluid user experience. These applications were commonly built using server-side technologies like PHP, Ruby on Rails, or ASP.NET
, etc where HTML was generated on the server and sent to the browser with each request.
- Universal Specialists Give Way to Specialized Roles: In the early days of web development, professionals wore multiple hats, handling both front-end and back-end tasks. However, as technology progressed and user expectations evolved, the need arose for more efficient solutions to deliver seamless, interactive experiences.
- Rise of Single Page Applications (SPAs): The advent of SPAs, powered by frameworks like Backbone.js and AngularJS, marked a significant shift. These frameworks reduced server load and enabled real-time interactivity, eliminating the need for full page reloads. This innovation addressed the constraints of limited server resources and ushered in a new era of web development.
- Emergence of Front-end Specialization: As SPAs gained traction, the delineation between front-end and back-end roles became more pronounced. Front-end developers, now in high demand, honed their skills in crafting captivating user interfaces and mastering HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. They also delved into API interactions and server-side communications, shaping the user experience with finesse.
- Back-end Focus on Core Functionality: Concurrently, back-end developers sharpened their focus on core functionalities such as data processing, business logic implementation, and database management. With the rise of SPAs, their role evolved to emphasize creating robust server APIs to support the dynamic front-end interactions seamlessly.
- The Era of Advanced Web Development Tools: With the proliferation of sophisticated tools like React, Angular 2, and Vue, web development reached new heights of complexity. Beyond simple form submissions and data displays, developers now grapple with intricate tasks such as JS-routing, state management, browser API integration, and secure token binding for authentication. This evolution underscores the dynamic nature of web development, continually pushing boundaries and raising the bar for user experiences.
We started to complicate simple things:
As a result of this approach, the problems were obtained:
- Difficulties in communication and coordination: Api Contracts and communication method — HTTP 1.1, Websocket, GraphQL. JSON parsing and validation.
- Divergence in Understanding and Knowledge: The divergence in understanding between front-end and back-end developers can lead to divergent optimization strategies. For instance, while front-end developers may focus on creating a highly interactive Single Page Application (SPA) with numerous queries, the same approach can pose significant challenges for the back-end. Excessive querying from the front-end can strain the back-end's resources, necessitating meticulous database access and data aggregation to maintain performance and scalability. Failure to synchronize optimization efforts between front-end and back-end can result in suboptimal system performance and increased maintenance overhead.
- Duplication of Work: The duplication of work between front-end and back-end operations is a common challenge in SPA development. CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations, which traditionally occurred solely on the back-end, now necessitate similar behaviors on the front-end. This duplication entails retrieving data from the server, storing it locally (e.g., in a store), processing user actions via dispatch mechanisms, and updating the store accordingly using reducers. This parallelism mirrors the actions performed by the back-end on the database. Consequently, this duplication not only increases development effort but also introduces complexity and potential inconsistencies between front-end and back-end data management processes.
- Challenges with Page Reloading and State Management: In addition to the duplication of CRUD operations, handling page reloading and state management in SPAs poses its own set of challenges. Unlike traditional multi-page applications, SPAs require mechanisms to restore the application to its previous state upon reloading. This entails reloading data from the server, synchronizing client-side state, and ensuring data consistency across the application. The intricacies of managing state persistence and synchronization between client and server further compound the development complexity and can introduce points of failure if not carefully addressed.
- Difficulties in Debugging and Testing: Debugging and testing become more challenging in SPA development due to the need to consider integration issues between front-end and back-end components. While isolated end-to-end tests can be conducted for the front-end, they may not fully ensure reliability in a production environment. Testing in the context of both front-end and back-end interactions becomes essential to identify and address potential integration bugs effectively.
- Increased Development Time and Cost: Implementing changes to an API contract now requires coordination between front-end and back-end developers, leading to increased development time and costs. Unlike traditional server-side templating, where changes could be made directly, alterations in an SPA necessitate collaboration among various stakeholders, including developers, analysts, and business specialists. This process often involves breaking down tasks, conducting thorough analysis, and planning rallies to ensure smooth implementation of changes.
- SEO Challenges: SPA architectures, formed primarily through JavaScript, pose challenges for search engine optimization (SEO). Search engines may struggle to crawl and index SPA content and navigation effectively, impacting the app's visibility in search results. To address this issue, solutions like Server-Side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG) are required to pre-render content and enhance SEO performance.
- Security Considerations: Security becomes a paramount concern in SPA development, particularly regarding the handling of sensitive data. Any critical information entered on the client-side must be securely encrypted before transmission to the server to mitigate potential risks. Additionally, SPA applications often require the exchange of access tokens for authentication and authorization, necessitating careful implementation to safeguard against security vulnerabilities and unauthorized access to personal information.
So, why is the usual front end dying?
Just go to any resource and you’ll see how many job vacancies are open:
- Next.js + React.js
- Python + Django
- PHP + Laravel
- Nuxt + Vue
These are all bundles for server-based web application development. The Hydration allows the server to render only the modified parts of the interface, rather than reloading the entire page. This approach optimizes performance by reducing unnecessary data transmission and rendering, resulting in faster and more responsive user interfaces and also Resumability further enhances user experience by preserving the application state across navigation events. This means that when users interact with the application, such as clicking on links or submitting forms, the state of the application is maintained, providing a seamless and uninterrupted experience.
The adoption of server-side templating approaches offers several advantages in the web development process:
- The server application now does not need complex HTTP or WS contracts and supports them on both sides, it can use better methods to exchange information with other services like gRPC ( gRPC is a cross-platform open source high performance remote procedure call framework ) if you want more explore then click this link --> https://grpc.io/
.
- Streamlined Approval Process: With server-side templating, the need for intermediate approvals is minimized, leading to faster change implementation. For a single developer, changes reflect immediately for users, eliminating delays associated with approval chains.
- Holistic Testing and Reduced Errors: Server-side templating allows for comprehensive testing, eliminating the need for separate integration tests. This approach reduces errors by ensuring that the application is thoroughly checked for functionality and compatibility across different scenarios.
- Simplified Data Exchange: By exchanging only HTML markup instead of complex JSON data, the intricacies of request-response logic are abstracted away from the user. This simplification enhances user experience and reduces the complexity of data transmission.
- Efficient State Restoration: Rather than passing large amounts of JSON data to restore the state of a Single Page Application (SPA), server-side templating enables the transmission of pre-rendered templates. This approach optimizes performance and reduces overhead, resulting in faster state restoration for users.
- Reduced Browser Compatibility Concerns: With minimal JavaScript code on the page, concerns regarding browser compatibility are mitigated. Server-side templating frameworks like Babel handle compatibility issues, allowing developers to focus on building functionality without worrying about cross-browser inconsistencies.
With the rise of No-Code solutions, AI-driven template generation, abundant server resources, and stringent SEO requirements, the traditional roles and tools of front-end development are being redefined. Business owners now question the necessity of hiring separate front-end and back-end developers for simple applications.
The concept of the full-stack developer is no longer a passing trend but a fundamental requirement for efficient staffing. Instead of seeking specialized front-end developers, businesses prioritize developers capable of building entire applications, handling database operations directly, and integrating with various services.
While complex or "headless" applications still necessitate front-end and back-end segregation, the trend is shifting away from SPAs towards solutions like HTMX. With HTMX, even back-end developers with minimal JS knowledge can develop web applications. JS logic is increasingly abstracted away, with server-side logic driving interactivity and functionality.
Regarding front-end responsibilities such as CSS styling, HTML semantics, and proper selectors, AI-driven tools and "HTML layout designers" now handle template generation based on Figma layouts. This shift allows back-end developers to focus on application logic, while the server defines the structure and interactivity of HTML templates.
Conclusion:
Now is a good time to think whether you need all these sophisticated front-end development tools and whether you should remain a pure front-end developer.
I expect current front-end developers to move to Fullstack qualification with a 60%-front-end, and 40%-back-end split to stay relevant specialists. HTMX is just the beginning, the vector towards NextJs or Nuxt tools will grow, and Angular-type frameworks will die if they can’t adapt to new implementations, although the Angular ecosystem already has prototypes on AnalogJs as well
Resources:
