From Visualisation to Reality: Developing the Back-End of Street Transformations
@betterstreetsai Twitter

From Visualisation to Reality: Developing the Back-End of Street Transformations

We've all seen those captivating images – the transformations of bustling streets dominated by cars turned into vibrant spaces for people, all thanks to the power of AI visualisation tools. These images are the 'front-end' of our urban vision. But much like a visually stunning website requires a robust back-end to function, so do our streets need deep foundational work to truly change.


The Allure of the 'Front-End'

AI tools show us exciting pictures of future cities and streetscapes. These visuals, both inspiring and compelling, allow us to imagine streets where people, not cars, take centre stage. Instead of just being roads, streets become lively places. We can see areas filled with plants, parks, and trees. We can imagine places where people gather, kids play, and artists perform. We also see new shops, cafes, and businesses popping up. The immediate appeal of these graphics lies in their ability to spark conversation and imagination, serving as catalysts for change.

While these images highlight the lively potential of transformed streets, they rarely capture how highly regulated and contested street space is. Every inch is up for debate, with many interests vying for a slice of the urban pie. Our vision for streets should be ambitious, but it's essential to remember the complex challenges and negotiations that go into reshaping our urban landscape.


No alt text provided for this image
Generative street images from midjourney @Johan H?g?sen-Hallesby


Diving Deep into the 'Back-End'

The allure of AI-powered visualisations can be likened to the polished interface of cutting-edge software application or a visually captivating website. Just as these platforms rely on intricate, behind-the-scenes back-end development to function, our cityscapes require a robust foundational framework. The 'back-end' in this context is not made of lines of code, servers, or databases, but of strategic planning, integration of technology, regulatory frameworks, and human-centric considerations. Without this meticulous 'back-end' work, our urban dreams risk remaining mere pixels on a screen, beautiful but unattainable.

Streets are not solely determined by a single factor but rather emerge as a consequence of multiple interconnected elements. The resulting outcomes are determined by how these diverse pieces are assembled and integrated. This interconnectedness highlights the complex nature of streets and underscores the need for a holistic approach in understanding and addressing its challenges.

The interplay of these different elements is what Beta Mobility is dubbing the six pillars of New Mobility, which can be broken down into the following:

  • User Behaviour: It's not merely about replacing cars with greener alternatives. True transformation requires us to rethink and reshape mobility patterns entirely. We need to inspire shifts in behaviour, encouraging communities, and the people and businesses within them, to embrace new modes of transit and routes.
  • Technology: Mobility is undergoing a revolution, propelled by breakthroughs in technology. Batteries are breathing new life into micromobility, while digital platforms are democratising access, allowing more people to share rides, routes, and resources. These advancements aren't just changing how we move, but what we envision as possible.
  • Regulation: As we navigate this new landscape, regulations provide the guiding principles. They ensure that as we integrate cutting-edge technology and encourage shifts in behaviour, safety, equity, and sustainability remain paramount.
  • Operations: This encompasses the intricacies of managing evolving mobility services – be it public transport, bike-sharing programs, or the next big innovation in transit. Effective operations ensure that as behaviours shift and technology advances, the services we rely on remain efficient, reliable, responsive, and economically viable.
  • Capital: The scale of urban transformation demands substantial investment. The introduction of innovative solutions, technologies, and unconventional approaches entails greater risk, necessitating different forms of capital, such as venture capital. Increasingly, we're witnessing a blend of public and private interests converging to finance these shifts. Public-private partnerships are becoming the bedrock, enabling cities to innovate faster and more effectively.
  • Urban Integration: A transformed street isn't just a conduit for movement; it's an ecosystem. Mobility needs to mesh harmoniously with green spaces, social zones, commercial pockets, and more. It's about designing streets where each element, including mobility, coexists synergistically with others, contributing to a richer urban tapestry


No alt text provided for this image
@betterstreetsai Twitter


In the age of digital visualisation, it's easy to get captivated by the endless possibilities for our urban spaces. AI tools provide us with a glimpse into a future where streets are for people, not just vehicles. But transforming these visual dreams into reality is a complex endeavour. As we chart our path forward, it's crucial to remember that our streets are not just pixels on a screen but living, evolving and dynamic spaces. Balancing vision with the intricacies of real-world implementation is our challenge. With collaboration, coordination, and partnership, we can turn these digital dreams into tangible transformations, creating cities that truly made for living.

Lasse Repsholt

Sektorchef at Dansk PersonTransport

1 年

Interesting points. Another bias og imbalance in the use of the appealing visulalisations of urban streetscapes is that they rarely look at the not so urban and dense parts of our living spaces. To give and example. Urbanization is happening but one third of the Danish population live in small and middle-sized towns (2.000 to 50.000 inhabitants), where we could dream up and realize some awesome improvements of the day to day life and mobility.

回复
Tim Gent

Independent Consultant with 30 years' experience in Transport Modelling, Operational Research, analysis and consulting.

1 年

If I can offer one layperson's view of these images vs the standard architectural models: when something is delivered poorly, the visual difference to a monochrome architects model can be hard to spot. In an AI scene the promises and failure are clear. Of course this matters not one jot if the developer has already made off with the profit and is not held to account. But that situation exists independent of AI. What really matters is accountability, so that developers know failure to think through every stage of delivering what they've promised will result in financial loss. Like these renders, it's an easy picture to paint but how we get there is a mystery.

Martijn Hollestelle

Data and simulations to improve mobility today - and plan for tomorrow ??. ???? in ????

1 年

It’s very valuable that you bring this up. I think that the photo realistic character of images these days are different from the architectural renders and artist’s impressions. In the latter ones, it’s much explicit that there’s a vision behind this, which is (hopefully) backed by a design and strategy. Perhaps that’s easy to forget when seeing more photo-like images. It’s great if before-and-after images can entice people and policy makers, but indeed we shouldn’t forget what it takes to make these images reality.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Robert Joseph Martin的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了