From Unicorn To Unicorpse: How LivingSocial Imploded
Sramana Mitra
Founder and CEO of One Million by the One Million (1Mby1M) Global Virtual Accelerator
We have seen several unicorns with artificially bloated valuations and questionable business models. LivingSocial is one such company. In late 2012, LivingSocial was valued at $6 billion and venture capitalists had poured in about $800 million. They were lured by the daily deals market which was expected to reach $4 billion by 2015. Today, LivingSocial is a unicorpse* having burnt money on marketing and expanding its user base, rather than focusing on its monetization. It was last valued at $48.4 million. There is a lot to be learnt here—about what not to do in navigating your entrepreneurial journey.
LivingSocial was founded in 2007 by Aaron Batalion, Tim O’Shaughnessy, Eddie Frederick, and Val Aleksenko, who had worked together at a health care startup. It started off as a social discovery and cataloging network for reviewing and sharing common interests. By late 2010, it had evolved into a social commerce engine offering local deals to a subscriber base of about 20 million people in more than 120 markets in 11 countries. At this time, LivingSocial’s business model of revenue sharing with merchants did have some strength and potential. It charged merchants 35% of the deal value. It was estimated to be earning more than $1 million a day and its valuation skyrocketed to over $1 billion after Amazon invested $175 million for a 17.5% stake.
Within a year, more investors like T. Rowe Price also rushed in and Amazon had increased its stake to 31%. With a total $800 million in funding, LivingSocial was following a growth-at-all-costs strategy. It was burning money on acquiring customers and marketing opportunities. It went on hiring and acquiring sprees and its losses ballooned.
It was toying with the idea of going public but put it off due to a volatile market and the disappointing IPO of Groupon in November 2011. The market was not anymore smitten by the daily deals business model and was skeptical about the margins, churn, etc.
In 2012, Amazon reported results of its 31% stake in LivingSocial and it added to the skepticism about their outlandish valuation. The results revealed that in 2011, LivingSocial earned $245 million in revenues and lost $558 million. It began experimenting with diverse services and business models. But rather than monetize its big customer base of over 60 million, it started selling full-priced vouchers for events and acquired a physical building where its local merchants could host events. If that strikes you as a stupid idea, it was.
It ended 2012 with a whopping loss of $650 million and laid off 10% of its workforce and Amazon valued its stake at a paltry $48.4 million. Today, New York Times reports that its work force has shrunk to around 800 employees from 4,500 at its peak in 2011. It has shut offices in several cities, including New York and Seattle. It has sold its acquisitions South Korea-based Ticket Monster, Spanish startup LetsBonus, and shut down its Australia and New Zealand operations. It is now focusing on its operations in the United States and Canada.
But it is too late now. The daily deals fad has passed. Groupon is trading 85% below its IPO price and Amazon will discontinue selling daily deals through its “Local” service. T. Rowe Price has written down its stake in LivingSocial to nearly zero. LivingSocial now plans to rely less on deals and focus on cash-back discounts on credit cards.
Moral of the Story
Every single entrepreneur who has gotten carried away by over eager investors’ willingness to fund growth at all costs without paying attention to business model and profitability concerns should take note. Your fate will be very similar to that of Aaron Batalion, Tim O’Shaughnessy, Eddie Frederick, and Val Aleksenko. You will be putting in years of work. You will create no personal wealth. And you will face public humiliation as your overvalued venture implodes spectacularly.
Please do not fall into this trap.
* The term Unicorpse was first coined in a TechCrunch article by Aileen Lee of Cowboy Ventures.
Looking For Some Hands-On Advice?
I receive many emails from entrepreneurs who want to discuss their specific businesses. I’m very happy to discuss your situation during my free online 1M/1M Roundtables, held almost every Thursday. During each roundtable, up to five entrepreneurs can pitch their businesses and receive my immediate and straightforward feedback.
To give entrepreneurs all over the world access to Silicon Valley’s knowledge, methodology, and network, I founded the One Million by One Million (1M/1M) global virtual incubator. 1M/1M aims to nurture a million entrepreneurs to reach a million dollars each in annual revenue and beyond, thereby creating a trillion dollars in global GDP and ten million jobs.
For those still testing the waters of entrepreneurship, I’ve written my Entrepreneur Journeys book series to inform and inspire. My newest book, Billion Dollar Unicorns, is now available from Amazon.
If you are interested in entrepreneurship topics and my writings, you can follow me here. I hope to publish articles on LinkedIn every week.
Photo credit: Elvert Barnes/Flickr.com.
Customer experience director l Design thinker l Business strategist l Problem solver l Growth mindset
9 年Great post Sramana Mitra. I can't help but think daily deal type businesses don't really have a sustainable model. All they do is create promo junkies rather than real brand value that can be sustained over and above simply price. Weren't companies like LivingSocial, Groupon et al always on a hiding to nowhere?
CEO at Cutshort.io | Get AI + humans to source tech talent | 3M+ users | 35000+ Recruiters | SaasBoomi SGx - W21 Alum and mentor.
9 年Good post Sramana Mitra! But being an entrepreneur myself, I cringe at the mention of "public humiliation" for mistakes such as this.
President at Lewis Studios
9 年Not surprised they imploded but, to your point Tom, I'm sure the founders didn't walk away poor. From a paper I wrote for a marketing class in 2011: "Daily Deals are relatively new but are already starting to fade as consumers grow tired of too many offers in their inboxes with too little relevance to their needs and businesses find less expensive, more direct ways to offer coupons or discount codes to their target consumers." and "Out of 27 offers received over the 10 day period from November 19th to November 29th, 2011, none were practical or relevant enough to use." and "As if Daily Deals wasn’t a challenged enough business model, businesses are finding that they don’t really need a 3rd party to operate deals for them. BP, for example, as introduced Daily Deals with their business partners directly with a location based Daily Deal program at petrol stations in the United Kingdom5. Coca Cola is a participant in BP’s program."
Leading Regular Folks, LLC / Honest Insight. Straight Talk. Sincere View of Workplace Reality.
9 年Rex and Sramana, my apologies for upsetting you with my comments.
Technical Writer at Infinidat
9 年Gregory Touretsky Eran Brown Shlomi Halevy